MovieChat Forums > Taken (2009) Discussion > Who would've been a better actress for K...

Who would've been a better actress for Kim?

posted 9 years ago by SisterSuzy101
12 replies | jump to latest

Someone closer to the her age (17) I think, as Maggie Grace for the most part looked at least 23-24.

I'm thinking either Emily Browning or Gia Mantegna personally.

[–] Thenewnexus 9 years ago

Nicole Gale Anderson she would have been 17 in this movie

I'm gonna show you something beautiful everyone screaming for mercy

[–] SisterSuzy101 9 years ago

Very true.

[–] roflwaffle357 8 years ago

i thought she was just fine for the part. i didn't think she looked that much older than she was supposed to be. as a side note i also think picking a somewhat tall and lean girl to play his daughter was a good choice because it makes her physically similar to Liam. i thought it all worked out perfectly.

Well Tony, nobody wants a war. If we can't do business why we'll just shake hands and that'll be it!

[–] msdawa 8 years ago

Kristen Stewart, Evan Rachael Wood, Emma Watson. Anyone else!

[–] DTChau (79) 6 years ago

Victoria justice, nina dobrev or katherine mcphee. The parents are really tall so their daughter would have to be pretty tall.

[–] SueDNim (33) 6 years ago

Who would've been a better actress for Kim?

Anyone.

[–] bankdawg (8) 6 years ago

Hayden Panettiere

[–] PaladinNJ (21282) 6 years ago

Good call

[–] spurtle467 (1527) 6 years ago

Gabourey Sidibe

[–] Johanesse (463) 5 years ago

To be honest, I was pretty surprised when I learned that Maggie Crace was the actress behind Kim. And while it's unfair to say that she didn't look the age, at least she could actually pass for a seventeen year old.

[–] MovieFan00 (211) 5 years ago

She didn’t look 17 at all.

[–] Johanesse (463) 5 years ago

Well, okay. We can agree to disagree.