MovieChat Forums > Game of Thrones (2011) Discussion > Will There Ever be Someone Whom We Hate ...

Will There Ever be Someone Whom We Hate More Than Ramsay?


A few months ago, I turned one of my colleagues on to this show. A few days later he thanked me, and said, "I'm four episodes in and already there's this guy I really hate, I just can't think of his name..."
I instantly said, "Joffrey--but, in a few more seasons there's someone you'll hate even more." When he finally "met" Ramsay, he told me I was right.

With (apparently) two seasons left, will/can the next Big Bad take us to new heights, and who--or what--will s/he/it be? It would have to be someone already in the story, with so little time left. The Night King seems obvious, but he's a monster. Can an actual monster revulse us as much as a monsterous human? The Mountain is another possibility, but he is probably a mindless brute who does the queen's bidding. My choice is Littlefinger, whom I've always thought was the most dangerous player in the game. I think he'll stop at literally nothing to win. What do you think?

reply

When I saw the title of your post, I also thought of Littlefinger. If they really need a villain and have to choose among the existing characters, he is the logical way to go.

EDIT: wait, what about Euron Greyjoy, I heard he is supposed to be a really bad guy.

reply

I've always detested Cersei more than Joffrey or Ramsay.

Tywin did far worse stuff than Joffrey (Sending the Mountain to burn down the Riverlands in response to Stark kidnapping Tyrion--what the heck? He didn't even like Tyrion. The Red Wedding was his orchestration, giving Walder Frey the go-ahead), yet he isn't on anyone's (let me repeat: anyone's) hate list. Why?

Because Charles Dance could have a TV show where all he does is read the dictionary starting from A going through Z and it wouldn't be boring. The man has a cool, calm voice and is a shrewd tactician.

reply

Euron Greyjoy was devious and cruel in the books, but in the show he's kinda a letdown so far.

Littlefinger is cunning and often cold, but I wouldn't call him evil.

Cersei is my vote. Without her children, she has nothing to prevent her from going utterly villain mode.

reply

I agree with both of you on the points you raise. Tywin had more time, and brains, to orchestrate (nice to be among literate posters) more evil than Joffrey and Ramsay combined. And i agree about Dance's acting chops. He makes a great antagonist, e.g., The Golden Child or Last Action Hero. There are two reasons why Tywin doesn't fill me with the same visceral urge to kill as the two younger men: First, out of sight, out of mind. I didn't SEE the Hound do the scouring. I didn't KNOW Tywin was behind the Red Wedding until after the fact. Second, Tywin has some admirable traits. His support of the Lannister name moved him to hideous acts, but did not blind him to what a damaged, defective creature Joffrey was. Tywin was not delusional, except for the incest beneath his roof. Second, he was kind to Arya. Kindness to Arya wins massive R_Kane points. He obviously knew she wasn't the peasant daughter of a stonecutter, but, instead of suspecting the worst he actually coached her on how to maintain her ruse. He saw the special young lady behind the disguise, and clearly enjoyed her company. These facts mitigate my judgement of Tywin. They need not mitigate yours.

Cersei clearly made her move into monster status with the incineration of the High Sparrow, her daughter-in-law and eight percent of everyone on the GoT payroll. She will grow increasingly insane, caring about nothing other than venting her rage and grief. That is why her reign of terror will be brief. She's not doing any thinking at all. She's got the life expectancy of a brownie at a stoners' convention.

Littlefinger, on the other hand, will be among the last players standing in this game. He is a survivor. He plays several moves ahead, and he is ruthless and unscrupulous. He threw his betrothed out the Moon Door, for menacing Sansa! Then he sold Sansa, daughter of the only woman he ever loved, into slavery to the Boltons!!

Ramsay and Joffrey are at the top of my personal list for a reason they both share: singularity of purpose. Joffrey's only reason for doing the things he did was because he COULD do them. He didn't behead Ned Stark, murder prostitutes, have the Hound ride down a butcher's son, rape Sansa for any agenda beyond exercising his right to do so. Ramsay was worse. His only agenda was to make people suffer great pain. Joffrey was an solipsist. Ramsay was a sadist.

EDIT Another factor is that Jack Gleeson is a great actor and MADE us hate him. When he was on the show, I often joked, "He must have the world's biggest bodyguard with him when he goes out because there are so many people who want to kick the crap out of Joffrey." He may STILL need that guy!

reply

Wow, great post! I agree with you on most points, so I won't go into too much detail.

Tywin was an interesting character. The man behind the curtain, working in the background and pulling strings-- somewhat like Littlefinger, but to a lesser extent. Yes, he ordered some rather evil deeds, but he didn't actually do most of them. However, his treatment of Tyrian was horrible. Him and Randall Tarly are in the running for worst fathers. Let me just say that in the books it was Roose that Arya pretended to be a serving boy to, not Tywin, but you do bring up a good point.

Cersei is on a one-way trip to insanity and destruction. She's just an explosive train wreck, bringing down everyone she can to ruin.

Littlefinger only cares about himself and power. He's crafty and cunning. I believe he once said that chaos was a ladder. But as to throwing Lysa out the moon door, he was only using her to begin with, and he wants Sansa anyway. Which is why selling her to the Boltons made no sense. In the books, it was a fake Arya.

Joffrey and Ramsay are definitely the worst; Ramsay even more so. Joffrey was a spoiled brat that had too much power at his fingertips and no one to tell him no.

reply

This is long overdue, I am sorry to say: Thank you, Leia.

reply

Hmm? Thanks for what? What's overdue?
Lol, sorry, still waking up here.
Just the well-thought out responses? If so, you're very much welcome. c;

reply

For the thoughtful response s AND the "wow".

reply

You're welcome! It's great to see detailed posts on here.

reply

I like your analysis. Great post.

Personally, I think Tywin was ruthless, but not outright evil. He didn't go out of his way to do other people harm, like Joffrey and Ramsay did. He wasn't a complete psycho, and while he was no stranger to the use of terror against his enemies, he didn't seem to believe in causing people needless suffering when he didn't have to, and was willing to try to find other ways to achieve his ends when alternative courses of action were available. Personally I can't consider Tywin a monster, even though he did some terrible things, or had people under him whom he allowed to do terrible things (that's not exclusive to him, though, either... Even Robb Stark's army committed atrocities, though he may not have personally ordered them).

I feel the same way about Littlefinger. Ruthless, power-hungry, greedy, willing to do cruel and terrible things, to use others and then discard them when they're no longer useful, but I don't consider him a monster in the same vein as Joffrey and Ramsay. To me, Littlefinger and Tywin aren't monsters except to the extent that all members of a feudal ruling class are monsters. Joffrey and Ramsay were monsters because they went out of their way to cause others suffering just for its own sake.

reply

This. Also think Kane's analysis was good, but agree that Tywin and LF are no monsters. There is rational explanations for all their "evil" deeds mostly.

Why Tywin would treat his son Tyrion so bad is one of the more mysterious and psychological interesting ones though, and could be seen as just wanting to take the pain of losing his wife out on the disappointing dwarf son. But from that to taking pleasure in torture just for the fun of it it's quite a leap.

reply

R_Kane, regarding your point about Tywin and Arya, I always wondered, are we supposed to think that Tywin may have recognized Arya as Arya? He was kind to her, and he was super sharp, no fool by any means, I always suspected that he knew she was Arya. But, of course, this makes no sense because he would have immediately killed Arya since they were at war with her family, right? I enjoyed their interactions very much.

reply

I don't think he knew she was Arya. He must have known she wasn't a commoner, but if he knew she was Arya, he would have taken her hostage (not killed her) to use her as leverage against Robb Stark.

reply

Great points and great posts. You write very well!

reply

[deleted]

And what the fuck does that have to do with this topic, you nutless wonder?

reply

[deleted]

Don't mind him. He goes around the boards posting about how the women in the films and shows needs whipping in some form. We have an ignore function here.

reply

Honestly, I think Ramsay got boring as time went on. He had no character depth at all. He wasn't interesting enough to hate, toward the end. I hated him in his earlier episodes, but when he died I wasn't that interested. When Joffrey died on the other hand, I literally applauded. I think the Ramsay stuff just got so gratuitous that it became numbing. He should have been killed off sooner.

I don't think i'll ever hate another character as much as I hated Joffrey.

reply

I see your point, and respect it. Joffrey was a badly twisted human, but still a human. Ramsay was pure Evil, and, as Hannah Arendt was the first to observe, Evil is banal. Speaking personally, I will always oppose Evil more than a severely twisted human being.

reply

Joffrey was better written than Ramsay. Joffrey was both all-powerful and pathetically weak, you never knew whether he'd destroy someone on a whim or be taken down with a bitchslap. That made him a VERY interesting character to watch, he wasn't just well-played, there was dramatic tension built into him. Ramsay is not complex, he's the embodiment of every cruel and gross thing the writers can dream up in their sick little minds. Rheon tried his best to make him more interesting than disgusting, but it was an uphill battle every week.

I don't think they're going to try and top him for horribleness, not as they work up to the final conflict between the living and the dead. Can't have the audience rooting for the dead.

reply

Lol @Joffrey. That's him in a nutshell!

And, yeah, Ramsay was a despicable twisted man.

reply

Excellent contribution, otter. Thank you.

reply

agreed

reply

I don't know who will replace him in the Villain of Villains role, but I hated Joffrey more than I hated Ramsay, as well. And I have to admit I was a bit sad when they killed off Joffrey, only because I loved hating him so much. Not that Ramsay didn't get my blood boiling, but a child capable of such vile acts is more bone chilling imo. And he was a spoiled brat to boot.

reply

Which is why Stephen King so often uses children as antagonists in his stories! And, to repeat myself, Jack Gleeson is a VERY talented actor.

reply

Yes, he is. It's a shame he kind of gave up acting. For us. I'm sure he's perfectly fine with his decision :)

reply

This. What makes GoT so special for me is that the antagonists are not pure evil. They feel like humans, albeit some crazy broken people, but still are humans. They are shaped by their world.

Ramsay at first was quite interesting, but the show went overboard and made the character super mega ultra evil, which took me out for awhile. He was not even a king like Joffrey, how can he get away with that amount of atrocious things he done to people. He should have been killed much earlier in a sudden unexpected death, GoT style, instead of a cliche'd taste-your-own-medicine scene. That was so obvious and boring, very un-GoT-y.

reply

Great comments, thank you.

reply

[deleted]

I believe Euron Greyjoy is intended to be the next "monster" for us to hate. In the books (and one released chapter of the next book) he's absolutely one of the most evil and sadistic characters, probably even eclipsing Ramsay and Joffrey.

Problem is in the TV-series the casting for Euron was very disappointing, and I struggle to see that guy being someone we will love to hate like Joffrey and Ramsay. One (if not THE) most disappointing castings in the whole series that. Why not pick someone that look a little bit evil and badass at least?

reply

I totally agree on Euron's casting. Additionally, it feels like he's just kind of forced into a space where he doesn't fit. Like, the books go more in-depth on him, but in the show he just kind of drops out of nowhere, his story feels rushed and his presence feels out of place. Like a puzzle piece forced into the wrong spot. I guess the show is already so packed with characters and with so little time, there just isn't much room for Euron. And to top off the disappointing casting, he's given terrible writing IMO. What was that silly locker room talk at the kingsmoot? Boasting to what seemed like half a dozen guys that he's gonna give Daenerys his "big cock", and he wins them over with that. I cringed. Even the best of actors would have struggled to squeeze some quality out of that ridiculous scene.

reply

Indeed. Euron intro should have began several seasons ago, it does feel like he comes out of nowhere, which will make him never as evil or twisted as Joffrey or Ramsay.

reply

Littlefinger is a good choice and I think the showrunners will do exactly that. But what I want is a more unexpexted villain. Someone like Sansa. Audience will go whaaa? That was GoT is used to be, right?

Think about it, Sansa is a villain in the making. She was a brat, a lying brat. Then she endured great pains and suffered a lot. She's Joffrey's and Tyrion's woman. She is also Littlefinger's protege.

I would like to see Sansa be the reason of Littlefinger's demise and then she loses her mind and becomes a grown up lying, cunning, revenge-fueled queen brat she supposed to be. But now, with a great powaah! Scary! Despicable! Yet understandable and sympathetic cause we literally grow up with her. The kind of villain I like for a game of thrones.

reply

The perfect character for that is actually ... [drum roll] ... Arya!

Seriously. She started out as a nice kid and is still being played by a super-likeable actress, but she's become a remorseless killer. She fed a man his own son in a pie, and is presumably just beginning a campaign of mass slaughter. All in the name of revenge and family honor, of course, but IMHO it's going to become clear that she's now a psychopathic monster.

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe if she's reunited with Jon she'll get some of her better self back, but I suspect she's beyond redemption.

reply

Hmmm, I don’t agree.
I don’t see any sign yet that Arya will murder anyone who didn’t harm her family or who she has to kill in order to protect herself (like the waif). Remember, she refused to kill Lady Crane (and that was right before she left Braavos) – if she was a psychopathic monster, why’d she even care?

Jon killing Janos Slynt was (in my eyes) actually about revenge for what he did to the Stark family, too. If it had been about removing a possible future threat to Jon, Alliser Thorne would have been the better choice, which was very clear even before we saw Thorne stabbing Jon – after all, Stannis did warn Jon about Thorne. Jon nearly kills Ramsey with his bare hands… and probably, he would have, if he hadn’t been stopped by Sansa’s shocked look (shocked at Jon running rampant, of course, not shocked at Ramsey being punched).
Hey, maybe Jon’s going to be the next big bad guy? – Just kidding, but come to think of that, it’d be that kind of surprise that many people seemed to miss during the last two or three seasons…

Admittedly, Arya takes an awful pleasure in killing those she had planned to kill which IS quite a psychopathic thing. But as I’ve said above, I haven’t seen any hint that she is going to extend that beyond the circle of carefully selected persons.

But of course, it’s perfectly possible that I’m wrong and you’re right.

reply

I do worry about Arya. I don't think she's going to be a villain, but the way she enjoys killing is somewhat disturbing. As well as feeding a man his own sons; that's pushing it a bit too far imo. Then again, as you mentioned, she isn't likely to kill except for revenge/defense.

reply

I think Cersie will go off the deep end

reply

Deep end? She's already at the bottom of the Marianis Trench, and drilling down! That's the last time that anyone makes HER walk naked through the streets of King's Landing!

reply

LOL yes you are soooooooo right!

reply

Thank you! To quote Al Pacino in "The Devil's Advocate," "It's so fun to be right!"

reply

So ironic that you quoted Pacino...I just watched Danny Collins last night with him starring. And Frankie and Johnnie the night before. But I never saw Devils,,,so that will be next!

reply

Above, I wrote:
»I haven’t seen any hint that she is going to extend that beyond the circle of carefully selected persons«

Welllllllllll…
Maybe the circle isn’t as carefully selected as I thought, because
[spoiler]being Frey and male seems to be enough to get added. Nonetheless, no real random killing so far…[/spoiler]

reply

I was right about her, she's a far-gone remorseless killer now. It's not like she carefully looked through the Frey family roster to carefully figure out who did what at the Red Wedding, she just killed them all because they belonged to an enemy clan. She may be redeemed to some degree, but she's beyond complete redemption.

And BTW, when I say that the TV writers have given GRRM's story the ruthless editing it needed, THIS is what I meant! Hundreds of boring and improbable pages gone, replace by one totally gripping five minute scene.

reply

It's not like she carefully looked through the Frey family roster to carefully figure out who did what at the Red Wedding

While she was impersonating Walder Frey, she said: »You're my family, the men who helped me slaughter the Starks at the Red Wedding«, the crowd cheered, which makes it likely they all were there.
Although admittedly, if there was someone among them who wasn’t involved in the slaughter, he probably wouldn’t have raised his hand to say: »Oh, sorry, I didn’t do that, I was gone fishing at that time. So you go on partying and I’ll leave because I have no right to be here…«
… but it is quite likely that they all were there at the Red Wedding – there was a lot of killing to do.

However, Arya spared the women’s lifes which still makes her less a remorseless killer than Tywin Lannister was.
So I still don’t agree with you so far BUT that might change next episode. The Lannister soldiers were nice to her and judging from the stories they told, they didn’t have any part in killing Starks. If she kills them nonetheless just because they are in the Lannister army, I guess you were right after all. If she lets them live, I still won’t agree that she’s a »far-gone remorseless killer«.

There is, of course, a third possibility: She decides not to kill them, but then someone says something stupid like: »I really laughed my ass off when they beheaded that Stark idiot« and thereby signs his own and his companions’ death warrant…

reply

"she's a far-gone remorseless killer now"

Not necessarily. The point of that scene with Ed Sheeran and the Lannister footsoldiers was to remind Arya that not all her enemies are sadistic murderers. Most of the Lannister clan is actually just regular guys cashing a paycheck. The camera lingered on the swords for a moment, but we didn't see anyone get killed.

Which is a big contrast from the outcome of her previous run-ins with Lannister soldiers and bannermen, that usually ended with Arya and the Hound put a sword through all their necks.

Now if someone comes across a troop of dead Lannisters with their faces removed on the Kingsroad in the next few eipsodes, then we'll know Arya's soul is lost. But right now she is concerned with getting justice for the people who murdered her family, not with killing everyone who happens across her path.

reply