I just saw an episode with the question "Who was the only president to serve his entire term without a vice president" (or similar wording). Their answer was Chester Arthur, but the question is nonsense, because of the "only". All four of the 19th Century vice presidents who became president on the death of their predecessors served their whole presidencies without a veep. These were Tyler, Fillmore, A. Johnson, and Arthur, none of whom was later elected to his own term as president. Until 1967, there was no provision for replacing a vacancy in the vice presidency until the next one was elected and inaugurated.
There's a silly alternative, since the pre-1967 Constitution merely says that the powers and duties of the dead/incapacitated president devolve on the vice president. Taken literally, it would make the correct answer to the question be "no one", because each of those four would have still been his own vice president! (In fact, there was debate in 1841 over whether Tyler was really president, or merely acting as one. Tyler's point of view won.)
The question cited above: "Who was the only president to not have a vice president for two years?" wouldn't have worked either. The four above plus Madison, Pierce, Cleveland, T. Roosevelt, and Truman all went over two years without a veep.
reply
share