MovieChat Forums > The Wrestler (2009) Discussion > A Rare Realistic Portrayal of Working-Cl...

A Rare Realistic Portrayal of Working-Class American Life


Most Hollywood movies these days pretty much ignore the lives of ordinary working-class people. And when we do see working-class people portrayed, it's usually laughably inaccurate.

It shouldn't really be surprising. The affluent, "creative class" types who make Hollywood films are usually from upper-middle class backgrounds. Many of these people (along with our so-called "representatives" in Congress) wouldn't know real blue-collar work if it ran over them on the highway.

Additionally, Hollywood increasingly depends on the international box office these days to make its money. And gritty, working-class Hollywood movies have long bombed in overseas markets.

So it was refreshing to see this movie's take on blue-collar, working-class life. As someone who came from that background, I appreciate how it was realistically portrayed in the film. The scenes at the deli counter and in the supermarket in general did a nice job of portraying the reality of blue-collar, menial labor. The grind of working hard, day after day, and still barely making enough to pay the bills. The sort of bleak life where the only "retirement plan" you'll ever get is when you keel over and drop dead of a heart attack.

It's often claimed that America is a classless society. Of course, that is total nonsense. Today's America is in fact the most class-divided society in the First World. Actually, a lot of Americans have long accepted this state of affairs because we all are taught that class mobility is greater here than it is in, say, "socialist" Europe.

50 years ago, that was indeed the case. However, the fact is, class mobility is now actually greater in many European nations than it is in the U.S. (even though few Americans are likely aware of this). Nor is this some "lefty" point-of-view. How many people remember that this very topic was actually discussed in the GOP presidential debates in 2012? (Yes, that's right: the GOP debates).

It'd be nice if we had more movies that actually acknowledged that lower-income, blue-collar people exist in America. But instead, we get unrealistic movies that depict Americans as being portrayed as a lot more affluent than they really are (as well as a lot of superhero, comic book crap). But it all does well in the crucial overseas market. Given that America doesn't really have much left in the way of export markets (now that we no longer have much of a manufacturing base), it's a situation that is unlikely to change.

reply

I'm not from the USA (I'm from the UK) but I agree, it was refreshing to see this kind of movie about the USA and it's true, you don't see that many where the people seem to be just surviving. I think in the UK we get more movies which focus on every-day people who are just living a normal life.

I was watching this with my friend who has been to the USA quite a bit and he said the same as you, that it was rare to see people living on the bread-line like this in movies from the USA. He also said that most people from elsewhere would be surprised at how much poverty there is in the USA - I think this does get glossed over quite a bit in movies and also TV shows.

reply

Spot-on. Almost every movie the family lives in a nice house, with nice appliances, etc...new cars. Like the OP said its because they haven't lived that type of check to check life, so the producers of films and TV merely imitate their own upbringing. Roseanne was ground breaking 25 years ago. But sadly, not much has changed. For those of you outside the US, don't believe the upper class hype of the average Hollywood film. What I find laughable is that in such films, even blue collar guys some how have houses and stuff that are FAR beyond their pay scale.

And when they do try to portray "poor" people it is usually a bad caricature.

The poster above is correct. British TV and film does a better job producing movies that show the realities of the working poor.

reply