Quagmire spinoff would've been better.
But the show couldn't survive without him. I think it would still be better.
shareIn this case I think no spinoff would have been better.
share
MovieChat Forums > The Cleveland Show (2009) Discussion > Quagmire spinoff would've been better.
No it wouldn't. Quagmire isn't diverse or interesting enough to have his own show. He's too much of a one trick pony
shareComing 2013: "Flyin' planes and rapin' dames."
Well why not?
---
"BE VIGILANT"
Yeah. Plus, I kinda call bull$hit on Seth McFarland's "Nobody wanna see a show about a rapist" statement seeing how Peter and Lois have evolved into morally repugnant people and done equally worst $hit over the years.
"Bullets! My only weakness. How did you know?"
Quagmire isn't diverse or interesting enough to have his own show. He's too much of a one trick pony
LOL Cleveland is BY FAR the most boring of the group. His entire repertoire of joke (singular) revolves around him commenting on stuff and events in a deadpan voice.
Cleveland just reacts to stuff, like when his wife left him. At least Quagmire is much more dynamic and makes things happen.
Heck, they had to basically modify everything about Cleveland to make him interesting. I do find the Cleveland Show mildly entertaining, but he's nothing like the old Cleveland in there.
I agree with you RenMarin2412. Peter and Lois are the most repulsive, ugly couple on tv and deserve to die.
share