MovieChat Forums > Edge of Darkness (2010) Discussion > buget 60 million dollars!!! in what?????

buget 60 million dollars!!! in what?????

posted 12 years ago by newav3
13 replies | jump to latest

considering locations, no music, unknown actors (and bad), I only recognize (besides mel), Damian young the bus driver of pete and pete, haha it`s funny, now he is a US senator..

[–] ticktickBOOOM 12 years ago

You've never heard of Ray Winstone ? Danny Huston and Frank Grillo have been acting for years and featured in plenty of films and done much tv work, likewise Jay O'Sanders for that matter.

Just because I rock doesn't mean I'm made of stone.

[–] esenada 12 years ago

Haha! I thought exactly the same thing! I recognised many of the actors, however I couldnt see where they spent all that money. What I mean is there was no CGI, no elaborate car chases or special effects or anything of that sort. I liked the movie, just cant see where the money went.

[–] stevenkickstart 12 years ago

i cant see mel gibson gettin a big paycheque either seein as he wasnt bankable at the time so its a mystery where the 60-80 million budget went

[–] maxamonj 11 years ago

Gibson was bankable at the time... He became a flop at the box-office after the tapes. Apocalypto was a success following his DUI.

[–] gdeangel 11 years ago

Seems to me location shoot in Boston is bigger $$$ compared to, say, location shoot in Cleveland faked as Boston. Actually, thinking back, I can't even say most of it was actually shot in Boston as no particular landmark shots stuck in my mind... maybe the train station scene, all 10 seconds of it...

[–] Prismark10 11 years ago

Oscar Winner Mel Gibson is an unknown?

A man who got $20 million pay cheques a few years ago!

Its that man again!!

[–] jordanthomas_2009-346-914758 11 years ago

Well camera crews are pretty expensive these days among other things, not just the stars get paid, theres a crew of around 200-300 who work on a movie. We're talking editors, writers, stunt crews, directors, producers etc etc they all need paying too, 60 million is an average budget for a film like this as apposed to a superhero film like The Avengers which cost around 260 million.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VE4-WkrRs6o

[–] huldu 11 years ago

I've seen "better" movies with a mere budget of a million dollars. After seeing the total budget I have no idea how they spent that amount of money on this movie. It wasn't awful but it wasn't nearly as good as the rating on imdb... Let me put it like this if Mel Gibson wouldn't have been in the movie I would have turned off right after his daughter got shot. That scene was just bad at so many levels.

[–] jasongibbonsxxx 11 years ago

There were good and star level actors in this. Most movies cost more money than that. Not sure what you think movies cost.

[–] inasafeplace 10 years ago

"Most movies cost more money than that". Source? Not many movies cost that much. Probably under 0.001%

How is 0.001% the majority?

[–] diegoalexio 10 years ago

There is no music. NO MUSIC! you're crazy. *beep* Howard Shore composed the soundtrack for the film. *beep* Howard Shore! Do you know who is Howard Shore? Is he composed the soundtrack of the trilogy The Lord of the Rings Peter Jackson, man.

[–] Soodinum 9 years ago

Unknown actors? You're ignorant.

And there were no stand-out bad performances in this.

[–] spookyrat1 9 years ago

I agree the OP is ignorant, but I'm not sure how this reasonably low key thriller, with no big set piece action scenes cost $80 (not 60) million to put together.🐭