Why does everybody hate this movie so much?????
I don't get it, I saw in theaters and loved it, watched it on direct tv cinema and still loved it, and I just bought the DVD yesterday. And Still love this movie. Jane Levy was awesome!!!
share[deleted]
[deleted]
I'll give you the only and one reason: 1981 Evil Dead masterpiece turned into 2013 Evil Crap.
share[deleted]
Not my case. Just watched the movie -for my first and of course my last time- and while watching I was desperately waiting the end to enter IMDB and write my previous post.
shareYou spent time during the movie just waiting until you could say it was crap? Doesn't sound like you gave it much of a chance. Tsk Tsk.
Learn to be aware and conscious of your consciousness and you will find who you really are.
I think he/she gaved too much change to it. Didn't want to judge it before saw it end. Still, it doesn't make this movie any better. Maybe slightly better than some horror remakes in 2000 and but still quite poor.
shareIts a few people with a 100 or so user names trying to lower the score
Well they are doing a rather pathetic job considering it's at 6.5 as of today, at least 3.5 points higher than where it should be.
|Statistics show that 100% of people bitten by a snake were close to it.| share
I went into this movie to hate it. And of course that's a very very VERY childish stupid ignorant mindset to have. Turns out it was a very good remake.
I wonder how many times people dislike something just because it's a remake...probably about 99% of the time. If this was the original it would probably be a cult classic masterpiece and if the 1981 version was the remake, people would be bashing on it for illogical reasons just because their fanboyism got butt hurt over silly reasons.
Time to grow up (like I did) and start being reasonable instead of sounding like an irrational fanboy.
Same here. I absolutely love the original, so I didn't go see this in the theater because I didn't want to be disappointed again. I caught it on cable about ten minutes in, and I groaned at the premise (intervention). Still, there was nothing else on, so I went with it. By the time it ended, I was thoroughly impressed. It was a well done reimagining with perfectly executed homages to the original. I think it's a perfect example of how to reimagine a classic while maintaining its spirit.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074958/
The Raining Blood was a nice touch/ addition.
shareEvery single one does this mistake.
First it's not remake. Ash and Mia coexist and are going to be together in the seventh Evil Dead movie so this is also a sequel. Next Fede does Evil Dead 2 and Raimi's does Army of Darkness 2 with Campbell. After that it's emerging time according to Cambell.
Secondly compare it to ANY horror film from 2000 and after and atleast i can easily say it's shining gem middle all this CG crap people call horror nowadays.
Fede is what horror needed. If this film was named anything else than Evil Dead every Evil Dead fan would have loved it. There is clear reason why Raimi gave permit's to do Evil Dead again after declining offers for so long. And that reason is Fede Alvarez...
Well put ! Bssically they couldn't seem to decide whether to remake it or re-write it. As a consequence, the parts they remade just didn't stand up to the original - just shows doesn't matter how much money you throw at something if your directing skills just aren't up to it !!!
shareI'll give you the only and one reason: 1981 Evil Dead masterpiece turned into 2013 Evil Crap.
Why don't the fanboys of the original just NOT see the remake? The remake does not take away nor hurt the original. It's still intact. It didn't die.
We live by the Sun, we feel by the Moon share
So since you liked the original film, automatically this one is crap? Sounds like you're just another biased fanboy. This movie, when compared with others in the horror genre, is one of the better horror movies of the 2000's. You give no reason why it's not good, other than its not the exact same movie as Raimi's 1981 film(?) is that the problem? Should they have taken all the same people and script and done a shot-for-shot replica of the original? Would that have made you happy? Probably not. I'm sure you'd still find some pathetic reason (like the one you gave for this film) to bash it. This was a straight up horror movie, with tons of blood and gore, decent/good acting, and good effects.
share[deleted]