MovieChat Forums > Albert Nobbs (2012) Discussion > Unnecessary Praise for McTeer and Close

Unnecessary Praise for McTeer and Close


I keep hearing a lot of praise for both Glenn Close and Janet McTeer, but I remain unimpressed. To me it was completely obvious that both were women and I don’t believe either would have passed as a man in that age or any other. Looking past the obvious physical traits such as McTeers noticeably small head in proportion to her body, lack of facial hair or five o’clock shadow on either character as well as a lack of an Adam’s apple; there were many other things that disappointed me.

To me, McTeer completely overacted her part. The way she always lifted her lip reminded me of what a five-year-old girl would do if you asked her to act like a boy. Contorting the face to look “manly” is one of the most simplistic and poorest forms of acting I can envision. Also, the way McTeer acted aggressive in many situations to again show her “manliness” was laughable and contrite.

On the other end of the spectrum was Close whose performance, unlike McTeer’s, was vastly underwhelming. I understand that Close’s character is supposed to be played with a calm demeanor, but to me her disposition was overly feminine, which was weird considering McTeer played her part with such overt and over-the-top masculinity.

The other part that was awful was when the two put on the dresses and began walking down the street. It surely got a laugh in every theater across the country as the two “manly” women tried to again act like women. However, that scene was so devastatingly awful in the way that Close was suddenly walking more manly that she had the entire the movie. Of course only moments later on the beach that awkward walk quickly disappeared as Close pranced on the beach like a graceful woman. I understand that the concept was that neither had walked like a woman in years and thus could not adjust quickly, but again, the overacting by McTeer was laughable and Close just looked ridiculous.

For once I would like to see a woman pull off this type of role with precision and elegance rather than overdramatic acting or sheepishly shy indiscretion.

reply

I agree with you here. From the moment this movie started (and I knew nothing about it) I felt uncomfortable by these "men". It was very obvious they were women and was already asking questions why everyone was referring to them as men.

I thought the beach scene was fun and for me it was the only moment where I thought they acted really convincingly.

My opinion about the movies i watch:
http://myfilmviews.wordpress.com

reply

you definitely missed the point as you viewed this film from, obviously, modern perception.

the movie was set in the 19th century, and during that time it is unimaginable for a woman to dress up like a man. so whoever comes out donning a male dress, is looked upon as one though how strangely-looking he'll turned out to be.

wasn't it how Helen described Albert in the movie?

with the beach scene, it was a very wonderful scene. i dont know if you really understood the message of the movie. it was not meant to be comic. it is LIBERATION. and you can see in the facial expressions of Albert how he feels: fear, hesitation, happiness, liberation --- all in that quiet but very moving scene.

it's a powerful movie. the only reason i could think of why you see this movie differently is that you were expecting a 'loud movie'.... something with a lot of shouting, hair pulling, slapping, loud confrontations, murder or even ghostly presence.


reply

The original poster (OP) also probably was expecting lots of zombies and guns.

the movie was set in the 19th century, and during that time it is unimaginable for a woman to dress up like a man. so whoever comes out donning a male dress, is looked upon as one though how strangely-looking he'll turned out to be.

A lot of people miss this point aeljs. Women simply did NOT dress as men in late 19th century Dublin.

reply

Agree that the OP appears to have missed the point about taking the film into context of the time it was set. I found McTeer's performance absolutely wonderful and how fortunate and blessed Helen was to have someone like Hubert come to her rescue. Regardless of Hubert's true sex, Helen was in a desperate situation and all would have been fine.

As for Close's reserved nuanced performance; she was able to convey Albert's desperation and naievty with care, skill and distinction. What a consumate artist this woman is. I guess somethings just fly right over some peoples' heads.

reply

...how fortunate and blessed Helen was to have someone like Hubert come to her rescue. Regardless of Hubert's true sex, Helen was in a desperate situation and all would have been fine.

I was one of the few people who wasn't bowled over by McTeer's performance. However, I loved that scene with Hubert and Helen at the end. I'm not ashamed to admit that made me tear up a little.


Challah if you hear me

reply

Spot on !!

......


I'd like a chance t' shoot at an educated man once in my life .

reply

Agree, as soon as I saw Mcteer onscreen, knew she was a woman

reply

I feel like such an idiot, because I did not, and when she flashed I had the same reaction Albert did!

Ironically, in the weeks before seeing Albert Nobbs I had been greatly enjoying a pragmatic, maternal Janet McTeer in The White Queen. When I noticed her name in the AN cast list, I was of course expecting another regal, aristocratic matriarch. Good movie, but I wasn't expecting the sad ending.

One thing that confused me is that obviously Albert did not smoke (she choked on the cigarette Hubert gave her) so why a tobacconist's shop? Why not a candy shop or a bakery?

reply

Understandable. When Mommy drops you on the head too many times it can cause substantial brain damage. Next time you have a thought just let it pass through the bowels and flush it.

reply

Agree, as soon as I saw Mcteer onscreen, knew she was a woman


Me, too. I agree with the OP.

"I prefer fantasy over reality TV - like Fox News" - B.Streisand






reply