MovieChat Forums > MasterChef (2010) Discussion > So The Judges Agree 100% Of The Time All...

So The Judges Agree 100% Of The Time All Season Long, But...

posted 8 years ago by Beck_Mill_00
4 replies | jump to latest

...don't start disagreeing on cook's dishes until the finale?

Riiiiiight. 

When they call the contestants to the front to evaluate their dishes, they haven't tasted them yet. Supposedly, they call them to the front because they look good and/or "seem interesting." And we're supposed to believe that every single time they call those contestants to the front with these untasted dishes, the three judges agree all the time during all the episodes?

But during just finale, then, and only then, the judges start giving opposing opinions?

[–] davidhkii 8 years ago

The show doesn't highlight their thoughts until that point in the show. I'm sure they disagree before that point too.

[–] ganjagaminggg 7 years ago

Nah, the OP is right. They only disagree on the finale because it would be boring otherwise. The reactions from the judges arent genuine and you can really easily tell that. Very obvioulsy scripted.
Not to mention that they know who the finalist will be since the episode 1.
Its really easy to see this kind of things if you know how reality shows work (or if you watched a few season of MasterChef, Hell'sKitchen) Its always exactly the same format. Pretty sad actually.

Winkys World YouTube

[–] therefdotcom 8 years ago

yup. just as much as every contestant on every single competition finishes exactly within the last 5 seconds. and also just as much as no team in the team competitions has or will ever just do a successful service.

[–] TheReccher (343) 5 years ago

Good food is good food though. How does any restaurant manage to hold any level of success if a widespread consensus on food wasn't possible.