MovieChat Forums > Lab Rats (2012) Discussion > If they are humans . . .

If they are humans . . .


Where did they come from? Did he make clones?

reply

I don't think we have been given that much info yet. I thin its been basically their top secret experiments and he's basically raised them (some flashbacks of him teaching them stuff with funny results---and hilarity ensues)......but no exact details on any specifics of where they came from, are they human--cyborg---etc.


reply

I was wondering that too. The flashback sequence from the 1st season shows them as small children being taught in his underground lab. This implies that they've been with him since birth or shortly thereafter.

So, are they his kids or someone elses? If they're his, who was the mother? If they're not his, how did he come to be their adopted father? Are they orphans and if so, how did they come to live with him? Who are their real parents and what happened to them?

The bionic kids refer to him as "Mr. Davenport" not as Dad or Father or Step Father etc... implying they don't see him as their father either.

It's pretty disturbing to think that he cloned them simply for experimentation or grew them in a lab, it is a kids show after all. Or adopted them for the same purpose. On the other hand, no explanation has been forthcoming from the writers leaving us all to speculate.

It may be something they're going to explore in future episodes or something they'd rather we all don't think about. And come to think of it, maybe we're all thinking too much about it anyway.

It is after all, "just a kids show."

reply

Yeah, I figured it was because it is "just a kid's show," and they were too lazy to figure out how he got the kids. That still bothers me though, I would think any smart kid would wonder about that. At least explaining it would make the story more interesting.

reply

In the virus episode, he says you're bionic - which means they were built.

I say they are robots.

-Doe
"When I'm wrong, I say I'm Wrong"

reply

They frequently refer to their "bionic implants" which means much like the earlier "Six Millon Dollar Man" of the 1970's, that they are normal humans with robotic parts. Also, as referenced above, an early episode showed them as little kids being home schooled by the father figure in his underground lab. Robots do not "grow up." They don't grow at all.

So clearly they are not robots. They also, eat, sleep and go to the bathroom, something an Android or robot would not have to do.

The dictionary definition of "Bionic" is:

bi·on·ic
/Adjective
1.Having artificial body parts, esp. electromechanical ones.
2.Having ordinary human powers increased by or as if by the aid of such devices (real or fictional).


So the question stands, how did he obtain these children since he's had them with him since their childhood....?

reply

I hope we get some explanation of their backstories.

reply

It may be something they're going to explore in future episodes or something they'd rather we all don't think about. And come to think of it, maybe we're all thinking too much about it anyway.
No, if they were good writers they will explain it down the line. They better not try to go that whole "it's just a kids show" route and just never make an explanation of their origins. It's lazy writing. You make a show about teens with super abilities that are secret government experiments and never explain how that even came to fruition is just idiotic.



i don't have a sig

reply

I agree wholeheartedly. And the end of last season seemed to indicate that they're going to take the show a tad more seriously.

So lets see where this is going....

reply

Just saw 1st episode for very first time but missed the first few minutes of it. So I assumed it was explained but from this thread ~ guessing not. Was wondering about their past as well, know for sure they are not robots because in that episode Mr Davenport makes versions of them as robots.

I would also gather from fact that he is using them for these missions/experiments that they may not actually be his kids via birth but perhaps were adopted into the program. Don't think they will ever give us the storyline to how they came to be in his care.

reply

The first few episodes of the 2nd season have begun to air and so far....no further explanation as to their origin.

In the Spy Fly episode when they bring the principal of their school a note to explain their frequent absences, they tell her it's a note from their "Dad."

This is the only time I can remember them referring to him as their father although he did show up with Bree to a Father/Daughter night in season 1. (And promptly spent most of the night with the boys much to Bree's chagrin)

When they are amongst themselves, they call him Mr Davenport. So perhaps they're simply calling him "Dad" so no one at the school will ask too many questions.

Hope they clear this up at some point...

reply

Yes, IA that calling Davenport "Dad" in public is part of their "secret mission/bionic secret" life but I think season one showed that the kids have thought of Davenport in a parental way:

*In the pilot, Adam refers to Davenport as their "creator/father-figure"
*In the Concert episode Bree clearly wants to have a more father/daughter relationship with Davenport like other kids have with their parents.
*And Chase is clearly jealous of Leo horning in on "The Call" which is something Chase sees as he and Davenport's "thing."

I know that we're only a few episodes in but this season (so far) seems less family-oriented. Last season, there seemed to be more of a parental/child relationship between the kids and Davenport but this season, so far, it's more like Davenport is just their boss. I'm not sure if it's the writing, direction or if it's intentionally be written that way for storyline purposes. Just my opinion.

reply

they are humans but they have special bionic implants. Maybe they were three little orphans....we don't know and probably won't know.

reply

I think the writers were very careful not to make them Davenport's bioligical children for the simple fact no (loving) father would ever experiment on his own children, let alone put them in harms way the way they are expected to perform under on their missions.

By having them be "Lab Rats", this allows an emotional detachment that might get in the way of either of them doing their duty. It also addresses any concerns parents groups, or older viewers might have as well.

However, it's obvious he cares about them because in the time travel episode with Future Leo, it's the fact he lost them that prompts him to spend the next seven years trying to crack time travel to prevent what happened at the Super Collider. Also, in Concert in a Can, Brie calls him Dad, and says she wants to spend time with him like the other fathers do with their kids. I don't know if that was a slip up on the writers part, or if they are slowly hinting at things to come in S2?

reply

He also,or someone else put a Microchip into each of their necks.

reply

In the pilot episode, Tasha refered to them as robots which the kids found offensive. Davenport then explained to Leo and Tasha that they're human with bionic implants. In that same episode Adam refers to Davenport as their "creator/father." Although the kids don't call him "Dad" directly, they have at one point or another referred to him as a parental figure. As somebody already mentioned, in the episode "Concert in a Can" Bree wants to have more of a father/daughter relationship with Davenport.

I don't think Davenport is their biological father. It wouldn't make sense for him to experiment on them if they were his biological children--this is DisneyXD not the SyFy network. The fact that Davenport raises them in his own private home, grounds them, worries about them, and even refers to Bree as his "Little Princess" in the virus episode (lol) shows his attachment and love for them. And if you don't believe that watch the Future Leo episode--pretty much clarifies his feelings about the kids. I really love when they write the parent/child relationship between the Lab Rats & Davenport and I hope we get to see more of it.

I wonder if there was any truth to the story that he told Tasha's mother about them being his "brother's kids who died in a volcano". In Concert in a Can he tells Bree, "I'm more of a fun uncle then a school activity Dad." Maybe Bree, Chase and Adam are family members who he took guardianship of when they were little.

reply

I don't think they are Davenport's brother, or sisters kids because Disney has to walk a very fine line between kid fantasy and scientific ethics (for older viewers). That's why they always emphasize they are NOT Davenport's biological kids because that crosses a line Disney will never cross regarding the depiction of child/parent relationships and behavior e.g. no loving father would experiment on his own kids and turn them into cyborgs!

reply

Good point and that makes alot of sense.

I guess we'll just have to wait to see...hopefully the origins episode will air sooner rather than later.

reply

I agree with the other posters above. It doesn't make any more sense from a moral point of view that he would experiment with his brothers kids any more than he would with his own children.

So I think the "My brothers kids when he was killed in a volcano..." story is just as much a cover as the one the kids tell their principal at school.

And I think the lack of more family oriented episodes this season has more to do with the absence of the mother/wife, who was pregnant in real life, than the writers planning on taking the series in a more serious direction.

The fact remains, they have not explained where the lab rats came from or why he felt he had the right to implant bionic parts in to what had to be little children.

It's the elephant in the room in this series and I have a hard time believeing it won't be explored or explained at some point.

reply

I hope they explore Davenport's relationship with them at some point.

reply

Davenport says they were genetically engineered in the first episode, so it's possible he made them from scratch, or perhaps some people were paid extremely well for their genetic donations.

reply

The hour-long season 2 finale really didn’t explain as much as I’d hoped.

***Spoiler Alert***

Davenport’s brother “Douglas” turns out to be the mysterious stranger who’s been spying on the Lab Rats since the end of season 1. He reveals to the Rats that he is in fact their “father” a fact that Donald Davenport reluctantly admits to later in the episode.

However, Douglas Davenport merely claims that he ‘engineered” them, and thus that makes him their “father.” He never claims nor is the subject even remotely raised as to how they were “engineered’ or even if they have biological parents of either sex.

Donald claims his brother Doug engineered them to be weapons for the military and that he wanted them to be heroes in their own right, so he took them from his evil brother when they were small children and raised them himself rather than see them become pawns in his brother Doug’s evil scheme. A fact that they tell him later makes him their real father in their eyes.

However, the term “engineered’ is tossed around loosely throughout the entire episode. How exactly they were engineered is never made very clear nor how they came to be born period. Are we to believe that they were test tube babies of some sort? If so, who supplied the original biological material so to speak? And how was it originally obtained?

Again, none of this is made very clear.

In fact, the episode raised more questions than it actually answered. What exactly the writers mean by “engineered” is left up to the viewers’ imagination. Did he take babies that were already born and add bionic parts to them? Did he genetically engineer babies from the womb to be born with bionic parts somehow? Again, none of this is explained or even broached in this episode.

Perhaps this will be explained more in a future episode or perhaps this is as much an explanation as we’ll ever get.

We’ll just have to wait and see….

reply

This is a Disney (XD) Channel show aimed at kids.

They aren't going to get into the deep scientific and medical ethics behind how the Lab Rats may have come to be. They just won't, and it doesn't matter for the young viewers this show is aimed at.

Kids will just blindly accept "genetically engineered" at face value like they accept the fact Superman can fly, and David Banner is the Hulk. That's the beauty of being a kid

reply

[deleted]

i'm assuming Douglas used his genetic material with a donor egg and made triplets

reply

I don't think they are triplets because they are each a year apart because Adam could get his drivers license first because he I 1 year older than Bree and 2 years older than Chase.

I don't really like to think of them as robots or something but in Bionic Showdown in season two Douglas said that Marcus was only an android ant that he wasn't going to last past his 16th birthday.

At the ent of that episode Marcus's robotic hand rises from the rubble implying that he was completely robotic. But since he was only an android he might be different than Adam Bree and Chase

I hope that more is specified in the rest of this season and possibly season 5 if there is one but at this point it seems like they might not bother.

reply

They're humans that have had their respective natural strengths enhanced by the bionic chips that can be inserted/removed via the back of the neck. There was an episode where Bree got tired of not being a normal girl and she destroyed her chip, rendering herself to the way she would have been had she had a chance at a normal human life. Donald has had them for years so that he could have the time to train their human bodies to learn how to handle the enhanced abilities. If they were not human, they would not have to train. The training they are required to do keeps their bodies in peak condition, because if they were to stop, they would no longer be physically able to keep up with their bionics. I'd like to know if they really are related to Donald, or if Donald's brother acquired them by some means, though. That's something I'm still not clear on myself.

I may not be able to prove that God is real, but you cannot prove that God is imaginary.

reply