MovieChat Forums > Assassin's Creed (2016) Discussion > Hollywood Hates Sticking to the Source M...

Hollywood Hates Sticking to the Source Material


With video game adaptations, I just don't get it.

Books like Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter or even Game of Thrones can get adaptations which usually favour the source material the majority of the time while trimming the fat but with video game films it's like "Woah...no no no, change it all, even the small things, we want a brand new story".

Now would it make the film automatically better? Who knows but at least it would feel like a video game film not some cheap, quickly put together knock off.

It felt like this film was based on Desmond's story but they changed a number of things even the small things like the look of the Animus for the hell of it. The excuse here is "well it's part of the overall universe" but I would have just preferred to see Desmond's/Altair's story on screen.

I just think it can be done, we can have video game films which stick to the source material but it seems like Hollywood just don't want to see it. Hell some games like Uncharted wouldn't take as long since all it needs is condensing down, removing the story elements which were done to add length to the game.

reply

Let's see we have abstergo, we have the animus (albeit changed), we have an unwilling test subject, we have the apple of eden, we have assassins and we have templars. You do realize that ubisoft themselves were in charge if everything right...seems to me there is plenty of the sourace material here. Also Ubisoft them selves said that the movie does take place in the same universe as the games. And also Jeremy Irons character is in the first game...

So yeah

reply

Literature is not a visual material. Games are. Why adapt already existing plots in games, if people could just play in them to watch this story?

Nolan, I love you forever!

reply