Stop Posting Reviews that aren't credible

Is Time a credible source?
http://time.com/4605625/review-assassins-creed-movie/

'The 15th Century wasn’t a great time to be alive, and it’s not even such nice place to visit. We went all the way back in time with Assassin’s Creed and all we got was this lousy apple. It’s not even a real one.'

Most of the reviews I've posted are credible. That's why some of them are deleted. Also, the embargo has lifted in the UK already, so what you might not get is that the internet is global, regardless of what time zone you're in. So, the first reviews should start getting posted online right about now.

I trust the Collider crew, they're basically just fans and closest to the demographic of normal people that are commenting here.




Soon as your "credible" reviews arrive you'll all be saying how they are too high brow and disconnected from "normal" audiences so their opinions are worthless. Which may be true for you personally, and more power to ya, but there's no way this will get Fassbender returning. No A-list actor wants to be the next Mila Jovavich.







https://youtu.be/COqgClha3D0

Yeah and now the "credible" reviews say the movie sucks.

Raging Bull = Best movie

Only reviews/critics I listen to are Jeremy Jahns and Chris Stuckmann. ONLY because we seem to agree on a lot of movies. I definitely started listening to Jeremy Jahns after his Olympus Has Fallen review. I saw the movie before he put out his review. I gave Olympus a "Buy It On Blu-Ray." Then I watched his Olympus Has Fallen review and that's exactly what he gave it. I do disagree with Jeremy Jahns and Chris Stuckmann sometimes, but about 95-98% of the time, we seem to have the same thoughts/opinions about a movie and give it the same grade. So they are the only ones I listen to and will help decide if I should go see a movie or wait until Blu-Ray.