MovieChat Forums > Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Part 1 (2012) Discussion > Would have prefered one film instead of ...

Would have prefered one film instead of two parts.


The biggest problem is that it feels like it is missing half the film. I would have rather had a 2 hour and 40 minute film. They did a very very good job on it and I am looking forward to part 2.

reply

I would've prefered one big film. Course cutting it in two is how they get you.


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

But by making it 2 films, they can get you to pay double. Would you have bought one film for $50? You're more likely to buy 2 films for $25 each.

They probably will in the future release one set with both movies- to try and get you to buy it a third time.

reply

It would not have been 50 if it was on one DVD

reply

...and twice as rushed. We would have never gotten a faithful adaptation, but a highly condensed one instead.

"Loyalty. Honor. A willing heart. I can ask no more than that." - Thorin Oakenshield

reply

It wouldn't have been rushed or condensed. He means one movie as in one two and a half hour long movie, not the whole story squished into 75 minutes. If anything, we probably would've just had to wait longer to see it.

But it would be cool if both were edited together in the future and given a special screening somewhere.


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

It wouldn't have been rushed or condensed. He means one movie as in one two and a half hour long movie, not the whole story squished into 75 minutes.

I know what he meant. That is not what we would have gotten. We would have still gotten one 70-minute movie made on a $3.5 million budget. However, it would have had the entire graphic novel squeezed into it. Instead, WHV will probably see if it can get us to double-dip and pick up a combined collector's edition with added bonus content.

"Loyalty. Honor. A willing heart. I can ask no more than that." - Thorin Oakenshield

reply

I know what he meant. That is not what we would have gotten. We would have still gotten one 70-minute movie made on a $3.5 million budget. However, it would have had the entire graphic novel squeezed into it. Instead, WHV will probably see if it can get us to double-dip and pick up a combined collector's edition with added bonus content.

And if it was made as a two and a half hour long movie, would you have prefer one film or have it still split in two?


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

A single, longer adaptation would flow better and be preferable to seeing the story split up. Even better would be a production budget that would allow for better and smoother animation (will full, cell animation being the gold standard).

"Loyalty. Honor. A willing heart. I can ask no more than that." - Thorin Oakenshield

reply

Once both DVDs are out people will make Fan Edits putting them together.

"It's not about money.... It's about sending a Message..... Everything Burns!!!"

reply