MovieChat Forums > The Babadook (2014) Discussion > I'm not being sexist but...

I'm not being sexist but...


Now I know this is going to sound sexist. But did this score so highly because it was written and directed by a woman?
I have to admit I turned it off after an hour. Biggest pile of RUBBISH I've seen this year. Screaming brat of a kid and a woman on the verge of a nervous breakdown it just tried too hard to show a poor single mom.
Maybe the last half hour was the greatest thing in the world but such unlikeable one dimensional characters I would only continue watching if at least I'm told both meet a well deserved grisly end.

reply

Doesn't just sound sexist, it is sexist.

reply

You considering her a "one dimensional" character leads me to believe you watched way less than an hour of this movie.

I had the reverse reaction. I loved the movie and was even more siked when I saw it was written and directed by a woman.

reply

"I'm not being sexist, but I'm going to say something sexist."

What's going on? What's all this shouting? We'll have no trouble here...

reply

Don't worry, he won't get far!

reply

Countless studies show that women get less credit and are judged more harshly for their work. So why do some people reverse reality and claim that a woman would somehow get more credit than a man? I'm guessing because they judge something negatively when it was made by a woman and want an excuse for their sexism.

reply

There are plenty of bad movies by men that are lauded to the skies. There would be more good movies by women if there were more women filmmakers, but statistically speaking their hit and miss record is comparable to the guys'.

reply

Are you a female, OP?

reply

I think the majority of people who saw the film probably didn't even notice the name (or gender) of the director until the end, and maybe not even then. Where did you pull this theory from, exactly? I've seen nothing in any review to suggest this is the reason, so I'm curious why you'd even bring it up if it wasn't due to plain ol' obvious sexism.

reply

"Now I know this is going to sound sexist. But did this score so highly because it was written and directed by a woman?"

Methinks yes, in part. There is a trending wave of female-led film and television programming recently, and a wave of appreciation for it. It's part of the marketing and publicity for such shows, which illustrates that the makers are savvy about the considerable desire within the public to consume such entertainment.

And I don't think the question makes you sound sexist. It merely makes you sound gender-conscious or gender-aware.

However, I will ask if you meant to imply that the filmmaker's gender was the ONLY reason why this film was so highly rated?

I watched this movie and thoroughly enjoyed the creepy atmosphere. There's still plenty to be turned off about it, but it was a huge success in creating a disturbing mood. And I don't see what the filmmaker's sex has anything to do with that.

reply

The question - likely rhetorical, in the common mode - implies that the film's content is undeserving of its high regard specifically because of the filmmaker's sex. That is, the high score represents a fault, an overestimation, directly related to her sex. It belittles the artist's craft by using her sex against her.


"You must not judge what I know by what I find words for." - Marilynne Robinson

reply

I didn't realize the director was a woman (though the themes of the film were very feminine) I am also trying to understand why the film was so praised, the acting is good but though it has a few moments it isn't all that scary and the characters ARE frustrating.

It's not a terrible film, but I do not understand the hype.

reply

There is "hype," and then there are expressions of genuine appreciation. I don't think it's fair to mix them. "Hype" belittles what people really feel.

As for not understanding, just read a few positive posts or critic's comments to learn why people appreciated the film. That's not, by the way, an argument to say the film is great, etc. It's pointing out that it's not hard to understand other people's positive responses. You don't have to agree with them, of course; but with a little empathy it's possible to put yourself in their shoes, one would hope.

Speaking personally, the movie spoke to me on a deep level. I think it tells the truth about repressed grief, because I've seen it turn people into monsters. Family monsters. I also think it tells the truth about the psyche, which always wants to project itself into the world, to create the world in its image. If the mind is sick, like a sick God that is the reality it will create. I also appreciate that the filmmaker chose to transgress the mother/child bond, a major taboo, perfect for a psych-horror story that doesn't rely on jump scares and gore.


"You must not judge what I know by what I find words for." - Marilynne Robinson

reply