Robert Pattinson


Who knew Robert Pattinson could act?
I never thought he could act this good. He was quite brilliant in this movie. It has to his best performance till date. What do you guys think?

reply

If you had seen Cosmopolis or some of his other indies, you would know he could act. He got fantastic reviews for The Rover:

With Animal Kingdom, David Michôd proved that Australia had a place at the table when discussing great new cinematic voices globally (and all but introduced the world to Ben Mendelsohn, Joel Edgerton and Jackie Weaver). With The Rover, he's taken the next step towards auteurship in a stripped-down, sand-blasted, shaggily-moraled, post-apocalyptic Western saga. In it, Robert Pattinson's star shines bright, offering the best performance of the year so far and one certainly worth of chatter come Oscar season.

It's magical enough that Michôd has culled a truly jaw-dropping performance from the oft reviled Twilight icon (who was also strong in Cronenberg's Cosmopolis) but his minimalist take on what remains after society crumbles is a rawhide-tough slice of devastation pie....

...But for every hundred Erics, there is a Rey. A beacon of hope to balance helmeted evil; a "tell me about the rabbits" simplicity to counter the post-Collapse incivility. Pattinson, as this 22nd century take on Lenny, has mined his gift. A solitary scene of him singing along to a mood-smashing pop song is enough to cement his ticky gumption but it's the smaller moments, when he's struggling to think things through, when he really shines. Each time Rey delays his speech, scrunched up and mumbling to find the right word, he secures his place in our sympathies as much as Eric's. Accordingly, Pattinson earns solid consideration for that sacred golden trophy.


Like Rey, The Rover is simple without being simplistic, wandering without being directionless, and solitary without being one-note. And maybe most importantly, it's a signal that Pattinson may yet be a star, but in an entirely different way than we first imagined.
A-

Full review:
http://www.silverscreenriot.com/reviews/out-in-theaters/686-out-in-theaters-the-rover

reply

Pattinson has consistently received praise for his roles since leaving the Twilight franchise.

"Few actors coming off the global recognition and financial clout provided by a record-breaking franchise have been able to do so with as much discernment as Robert Pattinson.

Films from David Cronenberg, Werner Herzog, Anton Corbijn, and David Michôd are under his belt — and James Gray collaborations in the works — and we now have another to add to the forthcoming slate." --
The Film Stage, upon the announcement of his casting as the lead in Good Time directed by the Safdie brothers.

"With David Cronenberg (Maps to the Stars), in an Australian thriller (The Rover, by David Michôd), or even in a small part with Werner Herzog (Queen of the Desert), Pattinson has definitely left mainstream productions and asserted himself as an XXL actor, the new embodiment of indie movies with fire power unequaled in his generation." --Romain Blondeau, French journalist in Les Inrockuptibles, Sept. 2015

reply

Extensive analysis of The Rover:
http://fashcam.com/great-films-the-awards-missed-david-michods-the-rover-starring-guy-pearce-and-robert-pattinson/

About Pattinson: "The part is a breakthrough performance for the actor who brandishes a convincing Southern accent and reveals a depth of emotion in what is one of the most skilfully interiorized and physically nuanced performances of the year, and if the film had been seen by more people, certainly merits awards nominations."
.

reply

He's working his ass off with some impressive directors who think he has the goods so it's nice when others get past their view of him because it became popular to attack him for Twilight.

reply

He can be hit or miss, but more hit IMO.

He's really good in tortured, wierd, supporting roles. He's got very interesting looks and charisma. But he's not the "romantic hero" type (the more I see him in his various roles, the more I am certain of this), but he's a very nuanced actor and can drown in his roles. He just needs to pick the right roles, not just the directors he wants to work with.

Roles + directors + co-actors + films. That's the ticket.

In the Rover, all of these came together.

---
Fear not for the future; weep not for the past -- Percy Bysshe Shelley
---

reply

I believe that the romantic hero parts aren't the ones he's looking for unless the script and the director are good. He prefers challenging, weird parts. Because of the intensity in his acting he is indeed very good in tortured, brooding parts.
His performance in The Haunted Airman shows his true talent: mentally challenging roles, creepy characters, not the winner types, that's his thing.
But don't underestimate his comic talents. I wish he'd do a comedy in the Coen brothers style, he would be terrific in it.

reply

I agree. He was quite good here and I hadn't known about him other than that Twilight crap so I was a little biased but not too much, who would have refused the Twilight role?

Then you get the certain few true actors who can take any role and turn it into a masterpiece. Some of my favorite actors are not these actors, Clint Eastwood for example is a very one dimensional actor --and a favorite of mine--, he basically plays himself everytime with small differences, same with a hundred others but I wont list the few I have high opinions of since somebody will take it personally.

reply

Mellow Fellow: if you watch him again in Twilight -- just watch HIM (just the first movie, not the 2nd, 3rd, 4th crapolas) -- and try to ignore all the cheesy stuff around him that comprise the rest of the movie (including the other actors, the dialogue, the horrific fx - though the blue light and the ambiance was done well)... then you can actually tell that he had taken some time to think about the role (Edward) and played him fairly methodically with surprisingly incisive perception of the character's background.

In the first Twilight, Rob played Edward as a 100+-year-old vampire stuck-in-a-17-year-old-hormonally-charged-body that -- after a long, almost unending drought (so to speak), meets the dream date/thirst-quencher/raison d'etre of his entire existence.

Rob played Edward to the hilt in the first Twilight movie. He did it exactly right. It was just a very, very unsettling role for most people to take (people who were not hormonal girls who loved the LOOK of the character).

When I first saw Twilight, I knew this guy could act. Then I saw the sequels and shut them all down. Ugh.

But I did see most of his other movies, including his first attempt at drowning in a character -- where he plays Salvadore Dali in Little Ashes. Odd, whimsical film with two wonderful portrayals, one of which was Rob's.

Try to see it if you can (with an open mind)... I bet you would like it.

---
Fear not for the future; weep not for the past -- Percy Bysshe Shelley
---

reply

Pattinson sure surprised me.. he was excellent in this.

reply

Watching now ~ Interesting movie ~ Guy Pearce totally intense as always ~ Pattinson has definitely moved into the big leagues ~ Kudos to him

reply

2014 was definitely his breakout year. He was wonderful in both this and Maps to the Stars, and has continued the hot streak in Life.

____
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1u27coFlGXg

reply

He sucked! You are all taking Pattinson pills, what a turd of an over-rated and overacted movie.

reply

Great performance I agree and also by Guy Pearce as well who is an excellent actor. They both did good

"I'm just a happy camper! Rockin' and a-rollin'!" - Patrick Bateman, American Psycho

reply

I agree totally blown away by his performance !!

reply