Why was this spared the razzies? I don't get it. The prequel trilogy got loads of razzies noms back in the day, and they were much better received overall than TROS was.
It deserved a worst sequel, worst director, and worst screenplay nomination at the very least.
No
#dealwithit
It was better then Last Jedi. At least I never hated it.
shareI nominate Horsegirl and Emo Man Child child for worst performances and I also nominate all the crew too for the other categories
shareThere seems to be a film industry bias against independent filmmakers, such as George Lucas. So when they produce something bad it gets special kinds of scrutiny and harsher criticism. Sometimes the big studios get this too, but not as often and it seems that films have to be pre-agreed to be bad, a la Suicide Squad. Even the studios seemed to admit that it was a badly produced film which seems to greenlight things like Razzi nomination. Or films where they were intentionally corny or made to be dumb fun; where it is like an inside joke to be nominated for a Razzie.
There was nothing funny about the Disney Trilogy and Disney definitely did not give that 'green light' for it to be scrutinized.
Now this is not conspiracy theories, this is just observation of trends out of hollywood and critics' responses over the last 20 years.
For as much as you might not have liked it, it doesn't even compare to the movies and people who did get nominated. None of the acting performances were particularly atrocious. But maybe you could make a case for worst screenplay.
share[deleted]