MovieChat Forums > The Lobster (2015) Discussion > What kind of drugs were they on?

What kind of drugs were they on?


You'd HAVE to be stoned to make a movie like THIS. I don't mean from a production standpoint, I mean, just the IDEA. How vile and depraved this thing is... some illegal substance had to have brought this on, or perhaps the screenwriter and director are mentally disturbed.

Why do they have to make movies like this? How many bleak dystopia pictures do we need?! Okay, sure, it's not another remake or sequel or adaptation, it's an original idea, but Good God, man, this is what Romeo & Juliet would've been like if the Manson family wrote it.

reply

Well if you don't like this style of film you really don't have to watch it.

I hate action flicks like Transformers and Suicide Squad but I know not to watch them.

I personally love dystopian films and I love the directors style.

reply

I personally love dystopian films and I love the directors style.

Then you're the type of sick individual who warrants these displays of psychological disorders.

I don't get why some movies and books have to be so damn bleak and violent. Aren't they supposed to be forms of escapism? To escape the real world because it's such a horrible place? So, why do we want our means of escapism to be as dark and gritty as the real world is? That defeats the whole purpose. Prior to the 1970s, filmmakers had the right idea.

reply

Movies aren't strictly about escapism. A romantic comedy, action film or fantasy adventure might be escapism. 'The Lobster' isn't an escapist movie. Perhaps that is why you disliked it. You were looking for a pleasant escapist movie and this doesn't fit the bill.

Often films reflect life, which can be bleak and violent. I suggest you look for films with happy plots and endings if you want to avoid bleak and violent. I don't mind a bleak and violent films. I don't find them depressing and actually found parts of The Lobster quite funny.

reply

A movie about a dystopian future in which one has to find a 100% compatible mate within 45 days or be turned into an animal. A dude and his brother, a dog (who couldn't find a mate) come upon a near-sighted girl and the dude falls for her. Then some sadistic bitch kills the dog brother and has the near-sighted girl blinded. At the end, the man takes a knife and, well, it's sort of a Romeo & Juliet style ending.

I doubt a sober person could come up with that story. This is drug-fueled cinema.

reply

You're combining characters there, and not every movie is for everyone but to say every film or book has to be happy and escapist is just as dangerous as the ideology that everyone needs a compatible mate or be turned into an animal.

reply

explorer, you are a fuXXing IDIOT!


"why do they have to make a movie like this😒😒😒😒😒😒"


why do you have to come here and make a fool of yourself and cry about it?

reply

why do you have to come here and make a fool of yourself and cry about it?

And why do YOU have to respond to it? Now who's a fuXXing idiot?

reply

😒😒😒 😒😒😒

well, someone needed to tell you you're a dumb ignorant fool for starting such an idiotic thread.

Edit: hows that?

reply

When you try to censor curses with 'X's, it makes me want to not take you seriously.

reply

yet, you staring this moronic thread in the first place makes it impossible for me to take you seriously.

you are a fool, plain and simple.

reply

And you still respond to them, so why not fXXk off?

reply

😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒

reply

Most sober persons would be able to summarize the film correctly.

You expected something different, got confused and are now desperately looking for confirmation of your unqualified opinion about a movie that you did not care to pay the proper attention to.

reply

You expected something different, got confused and are now desperately looking for confirmation of your unqualified opinion about a movie that you did not care to pay the proper attention to.

That sums up nearly the entire moviegoing audience these days.

reply

It's the other way round. If movies depict ugliness starkly, then the real ugly world actually turns a little sweeter.

reply

No, they aren't necessarily supposed to be forms of escapism. Like the other poster said, if you don't like dystopian films then don't watch. Simples.

reply

well in that case i'd steer clear od Lars Von Trier's work lol

reply

and michael haneke, and gaspar noe lol

reply

The world can be a horrible place, and it's a good thing to have art, literature, and films that explore those things and help you learn how to deal with them. If all films were meaningless popcorn flicks or sunshines and rainbows, no one would learn anything, and dealing with actual problems might be harder to do.
Films that talk bleak themes help people think "I have those fears and worried too, I'm glad I'm not alone, it's just apart of living."

reply

The world can be a horrible place, and it's a good thing to have art, literature, and films that explore those things and help you learn how to deal with them. If all films were meaningless popcorn flicks or sunshines and rainbows, no one would learn anything, and dealing with actual problems might be harder to do.
Films that talk bleak themes help people think "I have those fears and worried too, I'm glad I'm not alone, it's just apart of living."

Good way of looking at it. I mean, I didn't watch this movie, but my friend explained it to me in very graphic detail and I was SHOCKED. It sounded bizarre, horrific and quite sadistic. It just seems to me people prefer much more dark, gritty and violent content today than they used to.

reply

wait, so you didn't even watch the movie???? and no all ppl prefer now are mindless superhero movies which is why when a real film like this or the neon demon or wiener-dog comes around its breath of fresh air.

being shocked is something a good film will do to you, but you didnt even watch it and yet you started another moronic thread too add on its message board. and this country seems a little bizarre, horrific, and quite sadistic atm don't you think?

reply

and no all ppl prefer now are mindless superhero movies which is why when a real film like this or the neon demon or wiener-dog comes around its breathe of fresh air.

You call this a real film? Also, "Neon Demon", "Wiener-Dog"? WTF?

I could ask you what is so great about this movie, but you probably wouldn't be able to answer the question and instead just tell me to see it for myself. So we'll just eliminate the middle man and say you can't prove your case.

and this country seems a little bizarre, horrific, and quite sadistic atm don't you think?

So why do we need a ton of movies to demonstrate that fact?

reply

The Lobster is a brilliantly written, directed and acted masterpiece of modern filmmaking in the realm of filmmakers from the past who are nearly forgotten in modern cinema these days, thats whats so great about this film. There is an existential and surreal aspect to it that makes it a breath of fresh air and the humor is right up my alley. Is that a good enough answer for you? Ive seen dogtooth and alps, i know Lanthimos. I was anticipating this film for a long time and i loved it. Sorry I'm voicing my opinion on someones ignorant thread who hasn't even seen the film.

Do you know who Bunuel, Antonioni, Lynch, Kubrick are ? their influences can be seen all over this film and no, those aren't considered some of the best directors of all time for no reason. So when i see a new film paying homage to some of the filmmakers i love, of course I'm going to lash back at some idiot.

And yea, the neon demon was a real film, as was wiener dog and the lobster. They were made for the purpose of making a statement on something and not just solely to make a profit.

Todd Solondz is a genius and the neon demon was one of the best theater going experiences I've had this year next to the lobster.

Do you understand the difference between a film and a movie??

and do you even know of the names Fellini, Cassavettes, Rossellini, Bergman, Zulawski, Jodorowsky. if not please do not even bother responding to this post cause you obviously know nothing about film or filmmaking.

and were are these ton of movies that demonstrate that fact i said?, i mentioned 3 and we need films like these so everyone else who isn't a robot and in denial about humanity and this country being a complete disgrace don't feel crazy. everything else is some lame super hero movie, some pc bs or some lame comedy or family movie. i mean look at whats playing right now, jason bourne, star trek, jungle book still, bad moms, petes dragon, suicide squad LMFAO.

btw anyone who rates clockwork orange a 1 is clearly delusional 

reply

If you like weird, creepy, abstract movies about how morally bankrupt and mentally unstable our society is, then that's your prerogative. Enjoy yourself. I personally just don't see why you would commit something to film that you'd see if you took too much crystal meth. I have nothing against the cinematic masters you mentioned and I am aware they are innovative and film is their passion. I do respect people who have an appreciation for the craft, respect for their audience, and don't do it all JUST for a paycheck. Having said that, their work is just too weird for me to get into. But that's just ME.

Sure, the movies today are repetitive with too damn many remakes. And I think there are plenty of actors, writers and directors who should not be in show business.

But there are just some films that belong in arthouse galleries and not public cinemas.

reply

I understand, diff strokes for diff folks. you still haven't seen the film tho, so your opinion on what they committed to celluloid is still completely invalid until then. But personally i don't see the point in committing something to film that looks like a giant video game like almost everything that plays in the public cinemas today, 2 me that sounds like something you'd commit to film all tweaked out on crystal meth. But thats just ME.

So I'm def going to have to disagree with you about certain films only belonging in certain theaters. How will it give the small crowd of ppl who might actually enjoy the film, but have not really heard much about it until they see it playing at the theater by the mall see it. my point is, it gives films like the lobster a better chance at reaching those ppl than the ones who know about it already and know it will play at the arthouse by them. A24 is lucky enough to be able to do that with some of their releases since they just won 3 oscars the beginning of this year. Arthouse cinemas are very few and far between these days unless you live in nyc or la. The closest one to me is about 45 mins away, so i was ecstatic when i realized i only had to drive about 15-20 mins to see it at the mall.

Same theater played the neon demon about 2-3 weeks after it premiered at cannes. So ill take all the arthouse films i can get at my public theater any day, any time as opposed to driving more than half the distance id have to.

At least you can admit our society is bankrupt and mentally unstable.

And if you couldn't tell by now, i do enjoy these films, immensely!!!

reply

Then don't watch bleak, dystopian movies. They aren't for you and that's ok. I will admit that the trailer made this look more light-hearted than it is, but I still knew going in that it would be messed up. I'm not even sure that I enjoyed The Lobster, I just appreciate it for its weirdness.

reply

I find it very odd that this film is described as "dark" or "bleak." I'd describe its tone as darkly comic, but not dark by any means. And bleak? Really? I mean, there's tragedy involved, but it exists in this cold, absurdist universe that's intentionally hard to connect with. The coldness of the characters is typically played for laughs, and serves as an avenue for observational comedy about society's expectations about relationships. In no way did I find any of this bleak. It's a very competent film that's so obviously satirizing dystopian fiction. Having seen Dogtooth and Alps, I fully expected this to be more brutal and graphic than it was. It's not for everyone, but this "why does everything have to be so depressing all the time" argument barely applies here. I get the point, and I disagree with it, but this doesn't belong in The Lobster's imdb message board. If you'd watch the film and give it a chance, you'd probably hate it, but at the very least you might understand why this is a silly criticism.

Also, SPOILERS

You're just godd**n lucky the ending didn't turn into Dogtooth's tooth removal scene.

reply

You found it funny? In what way? I didn't laugh once and was unsettled most of the time by the movie. I love dystopian films, but this film was not good, was not interesting and was not funny.

(Note: This might be some of that "it is funny because it is awkward" new type of "humor" (like The Office or Parks & Recreation) that I don't get at all. I can't see it as funny whatsoever.)

reply

I found the woman on the bus proposing sexual acts hilarious, also when he kicked the daughter & the why aren't you dancing scene all very humorous, odd movie for sure but after watching To kill a Sacred deer figured i'd give this a go

reply

I think it's hilarious. It's intentionally awkward

You don't need drugs to come up with unique, weird stuff. That's the point of artists

reply