SAVING COMRADE STALIN

I second the recommendation to check out David Irving's videos.

He's a leading WW2 historian who interviewed many of the Nazi guys in the 50s and 60s. Sadly, he has been ostracized for trying to be honest and unbiased, as a historian is supposed to be. He has some interesting talks, and he questions some of the official narrative about WW2, Hitler, and the Nazis.



~ Observe, and act with clarity. ~

I've already made up my mind; I know the popular truth and the majority is on my side. Everyone who disagrees with us is a "conspiracy theorist", which means that they're probably a stupid young kid who only posts on YouTube, has zero credibility, and should be ignored.

I don't care if leading historians, scientists, etc, question the holocaust story. They're all wrong. *plugging my ears* LALALALALALA!

If they're not conspiracy theorists, they must be Neo-Nazis, Hitler lovers, or anti-Semites. In other words, they're bad people who I can write off with a single catchy phrase without having to listen to, think about, or consider a single word they say.

I am a very happy person and I laugh at you all! My ignorance is bliss! Now I'll turn on the idiot box to watch T.V. where I can learn from really trustworthy, valid sources!



~ Observe, and act with clarity. ~

I don't know that I would classify this as conspiracy theory, but it certainly is propaganda.

I question why a six hour treatise on Adolf Hitler has something like an hour and twenty minutes devoted to the excesses of Stalin. Yes, Stalin was the greater tyrant and killed more people but it tells me nothing about Hitler. This is a standard propaganda ploy, the bad things done by our enemies are worse than the bad things done by our friends. Note, by the way, that Stalin and Hitler were allies when they both invaded Poland in accordance with the Molotov-Ribbentropp pact. An historical event clearly missing from both nazi and allied history books.

Check out the 'historian' who informs us that Germany won WW1 in 1916. How did he work that out? There were millions of men in trenches from the English Channel to the Swiss Alps. Neither side had abandoned their military objectives. Neither side had surrendered or declared an armistice. It was a stalemate that lasted until the battle of Amiens in 1918.

What about the Jewish banker who 'stabbed the army in the back' by funding the Bolsheviks to fight Germany. Anyone notice that the Bolsheviks withdrew from the war? Not much of a stab.

All those unlabelled stolen bits from movies masquerading as contemporary newsreels. There was even the D-day landing craft scene from Saving Private Ryan rendered in black and white! A reenactment of events can be informative but why fail to indicate that it is not actual history?

What I learned from watching this is that Hitler could not accept the fact that the German army was defeated in WW1. That he deluded himself with the 'stabbed in the back' story. Without regard to his methods, he took a defeated and broken country and turned it into an economic miracle. Once he had his 'mighty' army he redressed the shame of Versailles. Then, when he had achieved this objective, he lost the plot.

In summary, kind of interesting as a propaganda piece but over long.