MovieChat Forums > The Astronaut Wives Club (2015) Discussion > The Mixed Legacy of the Mercury 7 "Astro...

The Mixed Legacy of the Mercury 7 "Astronaut Mafia"


One thing that a lot of casual viewers of this series seem to be tripping over is how the wives could have put up with such driven, emotionally remote, infidelity-prone husbands. Well, they were military wives all, and the particular ethos and personalities of the husbands ensuing from immersion in the test pilot world have been covered at length. But there's sort of an assumption that these guys really were the best of the best, justifying their elite status that allowed them to strong-arm NASA and force their wives to put up with them.

But were they? Now that the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo push has been much better documented, historically, it's pretty clear that the selection process for the Mercury 7 was ill-managed due to time pressure. The laughable scientific excesses of the testing lampooned the film version of The Right Stuff make for high comedy, but it's actually accurate satire. In hindsight, there's no reason to assume that the selection process really did tap the best of the best. Compare the 7 to the Gemini astronauts, who went through a different selection regime and were objectively more successful as astronauts.

But man, were they good at forming a solid clique that became very good at protecting their joint interests! If they weren't the best astronaut candidates, they sure must have been the most stubborn and hard-nosed. But what was the result of that solidarity as compared to their innate talents as astronauts?

Al Shepard -- Solid Navy test pilot material. Flew the first mission and handled the huge PR gush flawless. But when he was grounded he became a terror running the astronaut office for NASA, and that when he wasn't spending a lot of time pursuing outside business ventures. Used his fame and friendship with Slayton to wangle himself an Apollo mission over younger, healthier astronauts who had more hours in space than him.

Gus Grissom -- Nothing bad can be said about Gus. He was one of the best engineers of the 7 and yet was still killed in the Apollo fire, despite his grumpy insistence on rooting out technical flaws.

John Glenn -- Perfectly capable astronaut, but his run for president in '84 failed because he wouldn't heed his professional campaign staff. Noted for being arrogant and bullheaded in the Senate.

Scott Carpenter -- Run out of the astronaut program for his Mercury landing overshoot. Personally, I think Chris Kraft shafted him but you can't deny that he was drummed out of NASA after one shot.

Wally Schirra -- Maybe the best of them all due to his textbook Mercury and Gemini flights, but was still drummed out of NASA for getting snippy with flight control. Yeah, yeah, he "retired," but Chris Kraft has made it clear that Schirra wasn't going to fly again. Killed Donn Eisle's astronaut career to boot.

Gordo Cooper -- Lost his Apollo flight due to slacking off or was muscled out of it by Al Shepard, depending on who you believe. Later accounts make it pretty clear that he was not taking his flight prep seriously during Apollo.

Deke Slayton -- Famously grounded and turfed over to running to become overall honcho of the astronauts office for NASA. Later used his connections and long tenure at NASA to wangle an Apollo-Soyuz flight that clearly should have gone to one of the younger astronauts.

Tote it up: three of them were thrown out of the manned spaceflight program for pissing off NASA management; two of them wangled spaceflights out of canny manipulation of the astronaut mafia. And three of them ended up divorced, for what that's worth. Great astronauts? Compared to the Next 9, not really. But their hard-nosed ways served them well, even if it drove their wives bats.

reply

There are some women that don't mind if their husbands let loose a little as long as they don't talk about it. Marriage is about way more than sex. These men were doing something huge, dangerous and unknown. Throw in a bunch of groupies and that could lead to a little unemotional "hanky panky." Big woop. I honestly wouldn't care if I was an astro wife and my astronaut husband let off "a little steam" as long as it was done discreetly. Maybe I'm in the rare category in that but there are other wives out there that feel the same.

reply

A lot of women worry about diseases their husband might bring home. You're the first woman that I know of that doesn't care.

reply

Especially in those days. There was still a big stigma attached to divorced then. More women depended on their husbands as their only financial support. It was frowned upon religiously. Etc.

Also, to the 'Astronaut Wives", I'm sure the status of being "Mrs. So and So" more than made up for him fooling around.

reply

thanks Wab-3 for taking the time to give us viewers a history lesson regarding the astronauts!

reply

I'll second that thank you!!

reply

Not at all, not at all. And as I've recommended elsewhere, if you like this show, go back and watch From the Earth to the Moon, which tells the story of the Apollo astronauts and their wives. It's a really great miniseries.

reply

I figure that Astronauts are a bit like elite surgeons. They have to have a bit of a god-complex to be able to do their jobs. Self-doubt would be overwhelming.

reply

The Group 2 guys (New Nine) really were the backbone of the astronaut corps all the way to Apollo-Soyuz. With the exception of Elliott See, the group was excellent. Of course, a lot of criticism that we know of about See came from Slayton's book, so we should take it with a grain of salt. But, for the group as a whole, there was a mix of popular guys - Conrad, and Young in particular - and guys who were all talent and zero personality like Armstrong.

The Mercury guys were more lab rat than astronaut. You are right, Shepard should have never gotten Apollo 14 - McDivett or Borman should have commanded it. Slayton assigning himself to ASTP was also a horrible call. Don Lind or Joe Engle or one of the other guys in line forever for their first flight should have gotten the nod.

It was a real shame that they staffed up on astronauts and then proceeded to cut 3-4 flights. A lot of really good guys didn't go up at all, or had to wait 15 years to get a shuttle mission.

reply

It would be very hard to disagree with that. All of the New Nine (with the unfortunate exceptions of See and White) commanded both a Gemini and an Apollo mission. Of the Fourteen, all ten who stayed alive long enough also flew on an Apollo mission. But even Mike Collins, who was one of the Fourteen, says the Nine were clearly the best group (though there may have been a little self-deprecation in play there).

The group of scientists was kind of blind alley, though Schmitt did manage to walk on the moon. The "Original Nineteen," as you say, kind of got a raw deal, though almost half of them made it to (or, mostly, around) the moon. The "XS-11" turned out, of course, to be exactly that, so far as Apollo was concerned.

reply

What I don't get is this plot line of the Seven deriding the New Nine as scientists who aren't test pilots. It's totally contrived--the actual Seven never had that conceit. The New Nine were all test pilots and only Borman had been an academic.

This is just bad adaptation writing. There's plenty of narrative material to be mined in how and why the Seven (wives and astronauts) were actually wary and sometimes contemptuous of the new group. It had everything to do with money, privileges and military status ranking traditions, and nothing to do with a difference in professional background.

reply

Seems like you've deliberately spun the Mercury 7 in the worst possible light, for whatever reason.

Al Shepard -- Solid Navy test pilot material. Flew the first mission and handled the huge PR gush flawless. But when he was grounded he became a terror running the astronaut office for NASA, and that when he wasn't spending a lot of time pursuing outside business ventures. Used his fame and friendship with Slayton to wangle himself an Apollo mission over younger, healthier astronauts who had more hours in space than him.


Shepard was a tough boss who demanded 110% from the people under him, but considering the importance of the program and the privleges and perks astronauts enjoyed, I'd say holding them to high standards was pretty fair. Despite his reputation as the "icy commander", he liked and respected people who stood up to him (like the astronauts' nurse Dee O'Hara) or reached out to him (like his back-up on Apollo 14, Gene Cernan).

Shepard was cleared by the medical board and perfectly qualified to fly. He'd put in far more time with the program than the "younger, healthier" astronauts you claim he bumped.

Gus Grissom -- Nothing bad can be said about Gus. He was one of the best engineers of the 7 and yet was still killed in the Apollo fire, despite his grumpy insistence on rooting out technical flaws.


Sure sounds to me like you're trying to say something bad about him.

John Glenn -- Perfectly capable astronaut, but his run for president in '84 failed because he wouldn't heed his professional campaign staff. Noted for being arrogant and bullheaded in the Senate.


Noted by whom?

Scott Carpenter -- Run out of the astronaut program for his Mercury landing overshoot. Personally, I think Chris Kraft shafted him but you can't deny that he was drummed out of NASA after one shot.


That one might be largely true.

Wally Schirra -- Maybe the best of them all due to his textbook Mercury and Gemini flights, but was still drummed out of NASA for getting snippy with flight control. Yeah, yeah, he "retired," but Chris Kraft has made it clear that Schirra wasn't going to fly again. Killed Donn Eisle's astronaut career to boot.


He wasn't "drummed out of NASA". He had explicitly announced his retirement BEFORE the flight. He certainly didn't "kill" Donn Eisle's career either. Eisle did that himself being insubordinate with mission control during the flight. He was later assigned to the back-up crew of Apollo 10, but Slayton eventually had to fire him because after his divorce and new marriage, he became distracted and no longer put in the work.

Gordo Cooper -- Lost his Apollo flight due to slacking off or was muscled out of it by Al Shepard, depending on who you believe. Later accounts make it pretty clear that he was not taking his flight prep seriously during Apollo.


Again, that one is somewhat true. Cooper had always had a "strap in and go" attitude. While he got away with this to some extent on Mercury and Gemini, Apollo demanded too much attention to detail.

Deke Slayton -- Famously grounded and turfed over to running to become overall honcho of the astronauts office for NASA. Later used his connections and long tenure at NASA to wangle an Apollo-Soyuz flight that clearly should have gone to one of the younger astronauts.


Again, Slayton was fully fit to take the flight and was still a qualified astronaut. He had put in over fifteen years of service. There was no reason not to assign him to the flight.

Tote it up: three of them were thrown out of the manned spaceflight program for pissing off NASA management; two of them wangled spaceflights out of canny manipulation of the astronaut mafia. And three of them ended up divorced, for what that's worth. Great astronauts? Compared to the Next 9, not really. But their hard-nosed ways served them well, even if it drove their wives bats.


None of them were "thrown out". Two continued to work in it for some time, even when it was less likely they would be assigned to a crew, and third retired voluntarily.

Two of them were physically fit and qualified to fly in the Apollo program, which had always favored experience and seniority.

Yes, three of them ended up divorced, but that was highly common among Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo astronauts. It's curious that you would compare them to the "Next 9", because of the seven of them who survived the space program, FIVE of them eventually divorced.

reply

Nope, you're way out to lunch:

--Al Shepard had only one very brief suborbital flight to his credit, compared to the many Gemini and Apollo astronauts who had way more spaceflight experience than him, in particular long-duration flights involving long-term weightlessness, EVA's orbital docking maneuvers, etc. He was much older than the core of the flight-experienced astronaut corps and his flight status was dependent on an experimental operation for a disease whose recurrence in flight could have endangered his Apollo crew mates. Other astronauts were pushed aside or passed over for far less extreme issues. By any objective standard Shepard should have stayed grounded.

--John Glenn's issues as a senator and presidential candidate were widely documented throughout his political career. He himself admitted that he sank his own presidential campaign in part by not being willing to listen to his advisors.

--Chris Kraft himself said that Schirra killed Eisle's astronaut career by inducing him to mouth off with Mission Control. Kraft was not going to let Eisle fly again, period. He was done after Apollo 7, and some sources say that Wally killed Walt Cunningham's career, too. As to whether Wally was going to retire beforehand, we only have his word on that. Kraft wouldn't have let him fly again anyway.

--There was every reason not to assign Deke Slayton a capsule seat for Apollo-Soyyuz. He had NO spaceflight experience and his astronaut "career" was clearly almost over due to age. His seat could have gone to a younger astronaut in the pipeline to fly the Space Shuttle who clearly could have used the spaceflight experience. Instead, that critical spaceflight time was thrown away as a retirement gift for Deke.

--Wally, Gordo and Scott were most definitely thrown out of the astronaut program. Deke and Chris Kraft said exactly that in their memoirs. When you are grounded for incompetency or insubordination, you are effectively thrown out. Being allowed to hang on shuffling papers to earn your retirement is meaningless.

The point remains that, despite the hagiography, the Mercury 7 just weren't the supermen they were made out to be for the media. But they were damned good at working the system for their own benefit.

reply

-Shepard was barely older than astronauts like Frank Borman, Jim McDivitt, and Jim Lovell, all of whom were assigned Apollo commands. He'd kept up his training and flight proficiency in the intervening years and had been cleared by flight surgeons, who were notorious for erring on the side of caution.

-Documented where? He may have made bad call in his campaign, but that has little bearing on his merit as a senator, let alone as an astronaut.

-Eislie was responsible for his own decision to mouth off to mission control. Schirra's decision to retire has been noted in several books, including the autobiographies of Deke Slayton, Dave Scott, and Gene Cernan.

-Every astronaut starts out with NO spaceflight experience, and there's no guarantee that a younger astronaut would've flown on the shuttle, which was still years away. Many of the rookie Apollo astronauts, for example never flew again. In fact all of the junior crew members on Apollo 13 through 17 were rookies, and of those, only Ken Mattingly of Apollo 16 would fly again. Of the seven rookies who fly Skylab missions, four would never fly again. And as I said before, the astronaut office had always favored seniority, believing that those who had contributed to the program longest had earned priority for choice assignments.

-Deke did NOT say that in his memoirs. In fact, he disputes the kind of authority Kraft claimed to have. Again, Wally had already planned to move on to other things after his Apollo flight, as many of the Apollo commanders did (Borman, McDivitt, Armstrong, Lovell, Shepard, Scott, Cernan). Training for an Apollo mission consumed your life for one to two years and was extremely exhausting, especially as a commander. Add to that fact, they'd been putting in long hours and six day weeks for years by that time. It's not surprising that most of them became burned out and decided they didn't want to fly again.

While the Mercury 7 weren't as perfect as the media of the time made them out to be, they certainly weren't as Machiavellian as you suggest either.

reply

Really, all I need to post to rebut your arguments is "See above" since you're just regurgitating the same arguments I've already disproven with specific citations, but I'll go through this one more time:

-Shepard was barely older than astronauts like Frank Borman, Jim McDivitt, and Jim Lovell, all of whom were assigned Apollo commands. He'd kept up his training and flight proficiency in the intervening years and had been cleared by flight surgeons, who were notorious for erring on the side of caution.


Shepard was substantially older than many of the Apollo astronauts who had already logged serious Gemini flight time. He had been stricken with a very serious disease that caused him to vomit and faint at random, which was clearly a permanently grounding condition. Deke's heart murmur grounding was arguably within the bounds of over-caution on the part of the NASA flight surgeons, but Menieure's disease was clearly a career-killer for an astronaut at that time. There's just no rebuttal to that. Al got his Apollo flight out of pure croneyism.

-Documented where? He may have made bad call in his campaign, but that has little bearing on his merit as a senator, let alone as an astronaut.


Do your own research. Glenn himself has said that he bilged his own presidential campaign. His stubbornness and inability to work collegially with his fellow senators hamstrung his Senate career. This is widely known historical fact.

-Eislie was responsible for his own decision to mouth off to mission control.


Not according to Chris Kraft, whose opinion was the one that mattered. He felt that Wally influenced Eisle and Cunningham into insubordination with Mission Control, thus ending Eisle's career. As to Kraft's influence, history shows that his decisions stuck. He said that Carpenter and the Apollo 7 crew would never fly again, and they didn't. Wally claimed after the fact that he'd already decided to retire. Well, what was he going to say, that his mouthing off blew his chances for a moon landing mission? Proud men say a lot of ass-covering things after the fact. It was Chris Kraft who effectively threw the three out of Apollo. That's what matters.

-Every astronaut starts out with NO spaceflight experience, and there's no guarantee that a younger astronaut would've flown on the shuttle, which was still years away. Many of the rookie Apollo astronauts, for example never flew again. In fact all of the junior crew members on Apollo 13 through 17 were rookies, and of those, only Ken Mattingly of Apollo 16 would fly again. Of the seven rookies who fly Skylab missions, four would never fly again. And as I said before, the astronaut office had always favored seniority, believing that those who had contributed to the program longest had earned priority for choice assignments.


The shuttle was already being designed in '75 and astronaut staffing was being planned to provision an experienced cadre of Apollo astronauts to fly the first STS missions Deke was never going to go on to STS, so his Apollo-Soyuz seat and the spaceflight experience that went with it was effectively wasted. Arguing this is, frankly, asinine. Deke's flight has always been seen as a wasteful retirement present by NASA historians.

-Deke did NOT say that in his memoirs. In fact, he disputes the kind of authority Kraft claimed to have. Again, Wally had already planned to move on to other things after his Apollo flight, as many of the Apollo commanders did (Borman, McDivitt, Armstrong, Lovell, Shepard, Scott, Cernan). Training for an Apollo mission consumed your life for one to two years and was extremely exhausting, especially as a commander. Add to that fact, they'd been putting in long hours and six day weeks for years by that time. It's not surprising that most of them became burned out and decided they didn't want to fly again.


Deke took personal responsibility for tossing Gordo from Apollo. Says exactly that in his book. He also said that he didn't have a problem with Carpenter being tossed either. As for Kraft, history proves that he had the clout to get Wally grounded. Kraft may have been a tyrannical a-hole, but the historical fact is that his decisions were not countermanded by higher-ranking NASA brass.

While the Mercury 7 weren't as perfect as the media of the time made them out to be, they certainly weren't as Machiavellian as you suggest either.


Yes, they were, specifically Deke and Al. Your quibbles are just sophistry trying to rebut what is now well-proven historical fact.

reply

You know, memoirs are not necessarily fact; even history is not. It is usually told by the victors who are notorious for puffing themselves up, hiding their negatives and putting down anyone that opposed them.

reply

As "pioneers" of the astronaut program, there could have been none better.

Sure, Yeager was the darling of the test-pilot crowd, but didn't fit the criteria. There were certainly other test pilots, both civilian and military, that were better "pilots".

But any way you slice it, these seven pioneered the program. They went in blind, with no history of expectation. Hell, those CHOOSING weren't even sure what they really needed.

reply

As "pioneers" of the astronaut program, there could have been none better.


No, that's exactly the point of my original posting, that events proved that the next two groups chosen turned out to be significantly more successful astronauts than the original seven. The selection of the Mercury 7 was rushed, haphazard and highly politicized. The Mercury 7 turned out to be more of an odd grab bag of bodies selected from the US military test pilot community than a proper selection of those who would make the best astronauts. The Mercury selection process was heavily influenced by a bizarre set of medical tests that turned out to be largely irrelevant in determining who made good astronauts.

Just surviving the program doesn't make you a superman. The 7 turned out to be pretty average, all in all.

reply

The original seven seem to have been selected for some combination of:
- physical fitness and durability;
- breadth and variety of flying experience;
- PR appeal (well, Glenn, anyway); and
- service balance, i.e. politics.

Given what they knew at the time, that's not a bad set of criteria. Experience with just the first few Mercury missions quickly established:
- the physical rigors of space weren't unreasonable, notwithstanding some very conservative (on might say dire) predictions by the medicos before anyone had been there;
- piloting required thorough knowledge of the systems and general clear-headed attention to detail, but not any magic stick-and-rudder skills or combat experience;
- the program was selling itself; and
- well, I don't know what they found out about service balance. I suppose they discovered that NASA carried pretty hefty political weight on its own.

So, when they picked the New Nine, they leaned much more heavily towards brains and good sense than the other characteristics. But that doesn't mean they were idiots when they chose the Seven - they just didn't know enough about what was required yet. The Fourteen seem pretty similar to the Nine, with - perhaps - a bit of "plays well with others" thrown in for good measure.

FWIW, Mike Collins (generally a guy in the plays-well-with-others camp) could be somewhat disdainful of the Seven:

Carpenter - "A nice guy, but kind of out of it.... got into the wasp-breeding business (yes , wasp-breeding)."

Cooper - "Kind of went downhill.... Apollo seemed too much."

Schirra - "was late every morning, never apologized, and never tried to catch up with the schedule, but instead wasted another forty-five minutes on guffaws, coffee, and war stories."

Glenn - "the best PR man in the bunch," which - given Collins' opinion of PR generally - counts as backhand compliment at best.

reply

I think you're discounting how much effect the Lovelace Clinic tests had on the selection process for the Seven. Remember, they washed out Pete Conrad and Jim Lovell, who both went on to be excellent astronauts. I think Tom Wolfe's description of the selection process is maybe the most accurate account, and he makes it clear that the process was at least a little bit idiotic.

In hindsight, what seemed to happen is that they ended up with almost a random selection from the US test pilot community for the Seven, but it turned out OK because that was already a highly selected group and it turned out that being a Mercury astronaut just wasn't that demanding.

reply

Carpenter was selected because he seemed to match perfectly with the Lovelace Clinic assumptions of the perfect physical traits of an astronaut. Actually flying ability didn't seem to be a major factor there.

Wolfe and others think/thought that they should have picked the best pilots. That would have meant guys like Chuck Yeager, Scott Crossfield and Bob Hoover should have been selected. Others thought the best physical specimens would be best. Others thought you needed PhDs.

Mercury was fine, seeing as it was a shot in the dark. NASA quickly learned that you didn't need bodies like a pro athlete, nor did you need the best test pilots. That's why the later groups went on to much more success than the Mercury guys.

reply

I always thought they should have tried to recruit more guys out of the X-15 program. Those were the guys, pre-Gemini, who were racking up serious time "flying" using thrusters in a sub-orbital regime. It's no coincidence, I think, that it was Neil Armstrong who dealt with the most dangerous "flying" mishap in the Gemini program (the Agena docking snafu).

And, to give the Seven credit, if they hadn't put their foot down about having manual override controls to "fly" the capsule, there would have been at least a couple of fatal spaceflight incidents in Mercury and Gemini. And, in the end, it turned out that landing the LM was a manual piloting job anyway.

reply

I'd like to add a few things to your opinion of these men.
Al Shepherd - his Apollo flight was a PR ploy as much or more than any 'wangle' as you put it. He was the 1st in space, so it was good PR to put him on the moon. Plus NASA always liked medical experiments and he was a prime candidate for such.

Gus Grissom - yes, probably the best engineer of them all. But he was not a saint.

John Glenn - the only astronaut who did not have an engineering background or degree. He was an All-American hero due to his cross country flight in the late 50's. He was a PR darling, who excelled due to dedication. BY FAR the squeekiest clean guy of them all.

Scott Carpenter - too many irons in the fire IMHO. He went on to do a lot of ocean floor 'aquanaut' research.

Wally Schirra - the one astronaut who stood up to Houston and paid the price when he returned.

Gordo Cooper - the bad boy. The jester. He was probably the most naturally talented pilot in the bunch. Check him out on youtube, he swore till his dying day that had seen a UFO up close.

Deke Slayton - you nailed it.

At the end of the day, they were all superheroes. There was a reason these men were chosen, and they were the best in the world at the time. It's a travesty that they have been all but forgotten. It sickens me that rappers and athletes are today's "heroes" when they aren't worth the sweat in an astronaut's butt crack.

reply

At the end of the day, they were all superheroes.

No, that's exactly the point of my original posting, that the Seven turned out not to be superheroes. Due to a flawed, rushed selection system the Seven weren't the best of the best. Rather they were a somewhat random selection from the US test pilot community. The two classes of astronauts who came after the Seven were more carefully selected and turned out to be more successful.

In the end, being a Mercury astronaut didn't require you to be a superhero. It required calm, competent piloting and nerves of steel. The closest they came to heroics were the couple who had to pilot their reentry profiles manually.

reply

I agree, and with that, the best were Schirra and Cooper. Glenn a close third.

reply

Well, Gordo is an interesting case. It's so often overlooked--and again in this series--that he was the only one of the Seven who had to fly a fully manual reentry after a long-duration flight. His later issues shouldn't overshadow the piloting skill he demonstrated during his Mercury mission. And his Gemini mission had problems that weren't his fault (more systems failures).

It's never going to happen but I wish that a space historian would get a group of astronautical engineers to look over the data from Scott Carpenters mission and determine if he really did screw the pooch on his reentry. He also had to deal with a failure of the automatic reentry systems, and his overshoot may have been a perfectly understandable consequence of that.

reply