Arkham Knight Pros and Cons
So, I've finally gotten around to playing the game, and I've comprised my own list of pros and cons:
PROS:
1. Graphics are outstanding.
2. Voice acting is superb.
3. Gameplay is cool, but some nice new moves.
4. The environments are pristine.
5. The Batmobile was a nice addition to the game.
6. The inclusion of Lucius Fox. The Bat-Gadget man.
7. Nice to see Cash has a much safer job this time around.
8. Some SMART criminals. They see Batman and quickly haul-ass outta there.
CONS:
1. TOO. MUCH. BATMOBILE. I think everybody will agree that Rocksteady got EXTREMELY carried away with the inclusion of that car in this game. You need it to do almost EVERYTHING. It's like they were so proud of themselves they wanted to shout over and over, "look, we can do action drive sequences now!" Yeah? So can Rockstar North, and Grand Theft Auto V is a better game than Arkham Knight because you're not constantly driving around in a super car fighting tanks.
I want to be BATMAN, not his car! This is NOT Grand Bat Auto: Gotham City!
2. They took everything that made Arkham City cool and screwed it up! Instead of proper villain battles, like we got with Mr. Freeze and Ra's al Ghul in AC, we get tank battles. Again, it was Rocksteady compensating for the fact they spent so long on the Batmobile that they couldn't create an engaging story or work on developing their characters.
3. THE RIDDLER. God, I HATE that guy! I know he's supposed to be annoying, but GOOD GOD, they overdid it this time. Once again, you get to hear that snarky voice of his bait you whenever you find one of his clues. Remember that feature of Arkham Asylum? Remember how they took it away in Arkham City? Well, it's back. Man, and I thought Harley Quinn was annoying. She was thankfully downplayed in this game, just so we could have more of that jolly green jerk. I swear, if I meet Wally Wingert in person, I may have to slap him. Or resurrect Frank Gorshin and slap HIM for making the Riddler so popular.
And also, why should you bother to do his challenges this time? Remember in Arkham City, Batman had to solve all of Riddler's challenges to save a group of innocent medics and guards? Well, this time it's to save Catwoman who was STUPID enough to get herself caught by Riddler in the first place. She does NOTHING but make quips and sarcastic comments. I say let her die. If she was stupid enough to get herself into that situation, she deserves it. We didn't care about Catwoman's inclusion in AC, and we don't care about her here. They just put her in to be eye candy.
4. Not bringing back Paul Dini to write the story. The game developers were all, "ah, we can do it just as well." Obviously, you can't!
5. Characters we DON'T care about. Jason Todd? Really? If you recall, nobody cared about him when he was introduced, so they killed him off. The Arkham Knight was a very uninteresting character himself, and making him Jason Todd just made us turn away even faster.
Deathstroke? WHY is he in this game? Firefly, I can understand, because he ties in with the firefighter subplot, but why is Deathstroke going after Batman? He never held a grudge against him. We did not need to see that guy again.
So was this game worth the wait? Yes and no. No for overuse of the Batmobile, horrible character development and redundancy. But I guess those prideful idiots at WB and Rocksteady don't care what the fans and their customers think. But then, they probably tested the game with a bunch of drooling teenage fanboys who played five minutes of the game and then went home and masturbated to it. Batman: Arkham Knight is a letdown and a giant case of BLUE BAT-BALLS.