MovieChat Forums > The Monster (2016) Discussion > Hey, let's stretch out Jurassic Park's f...

Hey, let's stretch out Jurassic Park's first T-Rex attack to 90mins


but we'll do it with a Sesame Street monster that is crossed with Peppa Pig.

And that is the main problem here: the monster.

This is a good film, ruined simply on the fx and and makeup of the main horror element. The creature is quite possibly the most unremarkable and laughable thing I have seen put to film. To make matters worse, as the monster reveal progresses, it becomes more and more frustrating that a good tight narrative focusing on the relationship of mother, albeit a bad one, and her daughter is severely letdown because the first rate acting, editing, directing and sound is at total odds with the beast, which in no way drives the fear factor that the good actors all seem to project. It would have been far better to have not showed the monster at all until the final act, that way the budget could have been saved to really hone in on the make up and fx to really make the beast look like a scary monster.

If you're gonna call a movie The Monster at least have a horrific creature that touches viewers' primal animalistic savage fears, do not fuse together bits of Sesame Street, Muppet Show, Peppa Pig thinking that elements of everyone's childhood with teeth and claws will be very scary. It is not scary it is not clever, but it is a waste of time and money that makes this viewer not recommend this film.

The film would have been perfect had the antagonist been a killer on a motorcycle hiding in the forest.

reply

Thanks! You made me decide not to watch it and I'm grateful for it.

reply

I agree. Monster could have been a lot better. Also, the mother-daughter *beep* was too much.

Top 250 Foreign Movies
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls076565151/

reply

"The creature is quite possibly the most unremarkable and laughable thing I have seen put to film."
___________________

Watch "Hypothermia" with Michael Rooker (2010) and you'll quickly change your mind! No monster is as corny as that one! Ha!

reply

And by corny creatures, you mean Michael Rooker! Amiright? Lol. Just kidding. He's awesome.

reply

i'm a lifelong horror movie fan and i love creature features. there's nothing wrong with the creature design/FX in the film. there most definitely was nothing "Sesame Street"-ish about it.

jase-prasad, can you give an example of a creature from a movie that you thought WAS scary/well done/etc? that would help put things into perspective for me since i thought the creature was relatively well done.

reply

An American Werewolf in London
The Thing
The Relic
Reign of Fire

reply

the youngest movie in your list is 14 years old. looks like you don't watch that many monster movies...

reply

That and the films he has listed were or are considered big budget films not something made for a million or so dollars. Horrible is something like Mutantis or Big foot Ate My Boyfriend super cheesy costumes... the effects in this were pretty damn good. the weakest part of the film was the horribly unlikeable characters!

reply

jase-prasad, you have good taste! i love all the creatures in those movies you listed (i love or like all of those films as well especially THE THING and THE RELIC). the creature in this movie was obviously not on the scale of the creatures from the films you listed. it was more like the type of creatures in FEAST. again, i thought the creature design/fx in this film was fine (not amazing or anything) but i respect your opinion.

reply

I didn't think the monster looked nearly that bad, I agree it was a little underwhelming but there have been much much much much worse effects in monster movies. For me the monster itself is more of a backdrop to the emotional story of a dysfunctional mother/daughter relationship, so I didn't really need it to be some next level kind of creature.

reply

I agree. The monster was more of a metaphor for everything else going on. I didn't find the monster super scary, but the tension of the mother-daughter relationship and the situation in which they were trapped was scary. Also, a lot of the monster violence happened off screen in a sense, so that left more to the imagination regarding the horrific deaths of the other characters.

reply

This is a good film, ruined simply on the fx and and makeup of the main horror element

Nope, this is a bad film with equally bad fx.

reply

Well, the same could be said about The Walking Dead and Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead, etc...

"If Mad Max Fury Road is an 8, then I'll use 8 for OK, 9 is better, 10 is best."

reply

for a budget of 2.7 million id say the creature effects and execution of the monster was done better than the high budget films released these days

"the mucus queen is yours"

reply

[deleted]