My interpretation (Spoilers)


First of all, my native language isn't english so please don't mind my mistakes.
*sighs* This movie is about a woman dealing with an unwanted pregnancy, obviously, but let's think further. The "haunting" itself was symbolic, it was actually showing the pain she was in while wanting to have an abortion but having her wills denied by her husband, mother and society. It shows how horrifying it is to have someone always telling a pregnant woman (who wants to abort) what is best for the BABY, and not her; the house was symbolically her mind; the death of her husband was also symbolic: he was the father that after the baby was born, ran away; the last shot of the house showed how destroyed Jenny's mental health got after all what happened.
This movie is about women and their bodies being denied by society. There are plenty of dialogues in which we can identify it.
Please let's not get into a fight between pro-life and pro-choice, I'm just saying my interpretation.

reply

That's just a PERFECT interpretation! Really good job, i got nothing more to add on this, what u say up there its just all that the movie is about, a really nice movie btw.

reply

Yup.Sounds spot on.Good job.

reply

I agree with you. The house was Jenny's mind. All the repressed anger and resentment and frustration and fear manifested in the house as poltergeist. It mainly targeted herself though, she was apparently disappointed in and angry at herself for being in that situation, pregnant and having to move to Kansas... I'm a bit surprised the whole thing didn't affect her extremely manipulative and controlling mother though, she was somehow safe from the haunting ie Jenny's negative feelings. But it seemed like Jenny was totally under her mom's control and probably projected her anger towards her into something else - like the house, perhaps?
I read a critic review where it was said that the neighbours were totally irrelevant to the movie and a horror flick of their own; I think they were quite the opposite to irrelevant, the neighbour and her twins were also quite spooky somehow and the story about the twins refusing to speak without any reason was an example about will power and that there isn´t always an explanation to everything no matter how hard you seek for one. Or rather, not an explanation you want to hear. Like in Jenny´s case. A lot more for her to repress right there... maybe a sequel?!?
In general, a very good movie. It is not often you can find a horror movie not full of cliches and the usual things almost every horror movie recycles and repeats. This one has great potential. Especially taking into account that the budget was next to nothing and many people involved with the movie are in the beginning of their careers and were involved in a project like this for the first time. Emily Goss is an absolute star in her role as Jenny and the movie is a success for the most part for her grand performance in it. I think, and I hope, that we will be hearing a lot more from her in the future. Please, do another horror movie!!
Luke´s character, Taylor Bottles, was left quite distant throughout the movie, but I suppose it was because of the way his part was written for the movie. Jim Korinke as Walter was just grand, I wish we would have seen more of him! How have I missed this wonderful actor? Especially the scenes during the house warming party for Mommy were brilliant.
All an all, a very welcome fresh take on horror!

reply

Luke´s character, Taylor Bottles, was left quite distant throughout the movie, but I suppose it was because of the way his part was written for the movie.


Yes, exactly. The film is told entirely from Jennifer's point of view, and she clearly has mixed feelings about her husband. In fact, the same can be said about the other major characters. Her mother is almost absurdly monstrous; Walter is unkind and brutally frank (as Jennifer is toward him). The only person she interacts with sympathetically is her equally damaged neighbor.

We are given so little background on these people that we see them only through Jennifer's eyes, and she is seriously screwed up and thus unreliable. We shouldn't assume that the situations are exactly as presented because the narrator is unreliable.

Luke, for example - this is a man who came home to find his wife trying to abort their child. How can that not have an effect on his relationship with her? And yet, when we see him interacting with others, he seems nice enough. And he didn't leave her or have her committed to psychiatric care, which would have been amply justified. He also gets along with her mother, which suggests that Mom is not quite as bad as Jennifer perceives her.

If Luke actually loves his wife - which we don't know because we only see things from her POV - why would he take her back to a mother as overtly abusive as Meredith seems to be in Jennifer's perception? Probably he wouldn't, so either Luke is a fake who enjoys hurting his wife and has a thing for her mom ... or Jennifer is seeing everything through a black haze of mental illness of some kind.

I admit to finding Jennifer hard to like. While Emily Goss' performance was excellent, I did not sympathize much with her character. That zombie-like stare, flat affect and obsession about her life in Chicago all suggested to me that she had serious mental problems, including a very negative self-image. While I could feel sorry for her if she were a nicer person, in fact she does come across exactly as Luke describes her toward the end: someone who is utterly focused on herself. Walter saw this, too; if we are meant to see him as the movie's Greek chorus, then his evident dislike for Jennifer suggests that we are not supposed to see her as entirely sympathetic.

The baby's well-being is not the only thing that matters, but it does matter, and I think Luke is more than justified in believing that Jennifer is a threat to their child.

None of this makes House on Pine Street a bad film. Actually, it was quite good except the ending, which was disappointing.



reply

Great interpretation, and I agree!

I really hated how the husband (and the mother) showed much more concern for the baby than Jenny. At one point, the husband told Jenny it wasn't about her anymore but it was about their family, and I thought, "And if the mom goes insane, that's okay as long as the baby is okay?!?"

I'm not saying he shouldn't try to protect his unborn child, but his lack of concern for his wife and her mental health was really troubling.

reply

That's a really good interpretation.

I liked the end shot of the door - most 'ghost' films would have slammed it shut. But without her there, the 'ghost' is silent.

reply