121 Minutes In Hell


Firstly, to put an end to the replies criticizing my criticism that it's only based on a hatred of religion or the theme of the movie, I am a Christian and although I'm not generally a fan of them, I give any "religious" film a chance. Most of the time they feel like they are based on events that transpired on another planet; people, dialogue and most of the time even locations or set dressings are sanitized to the point the suspension of reality needs to be on par with a science fiction film. With that in mind, I'll start with the one good thing I have to say about 90 Minutes in Heaven - it at least looks like it took place on the planet earth, in the year 1989. The cinematography and design and props departments did a fine job (I particularly enjoyed seeing Teddy Ruxpin in a couple of scenes)

The two stars of the film had little to work with other than extensive makeup. Could we not all tell Kate Bosworth really didn't want to be there? If looking to make a mark on this genre, she should have instead gave the forthcoming "Captive" a look - because she nailed the nuances of somebody held against their will in 90 Minutes in Heaven, although maybe not deliberately. Hayden gets the award for best fake accent. His portrayal of Don Piper was believable in the first few moments, until the car crash scene left him forced to portray a man struggling internally and externally, with only the reasons for the latter conveyed at all to the audience. At this point the real-life Don Piper had lost his will to live because the heaven he saw in his near death experience made life on earth lackluster (you could compare that to seeing a really great film, and then seeing this one) none of that is explained, either verbally or otherwise. It just looks to the viewer like Don is being an *beep* to his wife and family, doctors, nurses, in-laws and fellow congregants (and was perhaps further unsettled because his broken leg made it impossible to kick any dogs) because of the accident. Hayden pulled off the best performance he could manage without being able to let the audience in on anything. He deserves an Oscar for not walking off set and seeing the first lawyer in Atlanta he could find that specialized in contract termination.

From there, it gets really painful. Don gets better, but we're really only emotionally invested in that payoff because we know it will lead to the merciful end of the film. Next to nothing about his N.D.E. is explained. In between a couple of commercials for McDonalds, the film's best actor (Marshall Bell) shows off the homework he obviously did for the role when explaining what the "fixator" does to help heal Don's badly broken leg. It maybe the only thing I truly got out of the movie - knowing what the hell one of those is for.

Oh, wait - one more good thing I can say about the movie - It was made by a sort of first of it's kind non-profit entertainment corporation. Any profits (although I would imagine some Hollywood accounting and big bonuses come in somewhere) will be donated to charity. Unfortunately, there probably won't be any.

One of the worst movies I've ever seen. But it did bring me closer to God. From the beginning of it, I was praying the end was near.

reply

Much anger I see in you...........chill out it's a movie. One that you didn't get OK.

reply

I thought this was one of the purposes of these boards? To critique movies.

Anger? I hope you never watched or read Roger Ebert. (Not that I am anywhere close to as good of a movie reviewer, but his spared no tongue lashings) but seriously - not liking a movie and feeling a little jilted that little to no effort was made to make it an enjoyable one, makes me an angry person? And how exactly do you see this through the internet? Please, enlighten me.

I'm glad you loved the movie. Lazy writers and filmmakers everywhere love you for it.

reply

They went into great detail to explain their point.

You trolled.

reply

Bingo I think spider34 nailed it to all the rest of you guess you did not like it either not enough drama, explosions, tawdry sex scenes... the point is that it was a true story see my other post.

reply

I was hoping he ends up cutting his arm off like 127 minutes.

reply

Excellent and well-written criticism! Keep it up!

reply

How did you make it through all 121 minutes? I couldn't make it past 12.

reply

I applaud your stick-tuitiveness. I know that's not a a word but it works here I think. I didn't make it past the trailer. My reasoning for that is Hayden Christensen! He's the actors equivalent of sitting at the DMV. Incredibly mundane and at times life destroying. The trailer made my face hurt. Thanks for the well crafted review to confirm my early findings.

reply

So you're thanking someone for giving you what you want to hear.

reply

Well, not really. But so what if I was? I'm not sure what your point is exactly. As if you've never appreciated someone for echoing your thoughts, feelings, or suspicion's. That's just human nature to find common ground with others. All I can infer by your comment is that you're annoyed that I chose to avoid this film based on the previews and a review that confirmed every single thing I thought I wouldn't enjoy about the film. If you saw that same preview and decided to watch the movie and you enjoyed it, great! You go girl!

reply

But it did bring me closer to God. From the beginning of it, I was praying the end was near.


🙌

reply

this movie sucks ass

reply

Heap of garbage. Struggled and struggle, and yes, bloody struggled and pushed close to the 60 minute mark and then sat wondering how I could litigate against some idiots that put this together that wasted near one hour of my life I could never retrieve back.

"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law"

reply