The first installment wasn't exactly Citizen Kane but its story was intriguing enough. This one had virtually zero plot and Keanu Reeves' acting couldn't carry the dramatic scenes. Action was a 10, however.
sharePersonally, I liked every bit of the movie.
shareI'm sorry to break it down to you, but you're the only one dude.
shareI was bored for the entirety of this moronic piece of s*it...
The first movie was awesome and amazing...this one is basically retarded...
"Today is the tomorrow I was so worried about yesterday"--Anthony Hopkins
I completely agree. I even feel like the action scenes were dragged out and overly choreographed. I also feel like in the first movie, Wick's actions were justified, but not really in this one. He should have know that guy would blow up his house, when he mentioned his lovely home, it was obviously a threat. Had Wick actually accepted the marker, he would have avoided his house being blown up and there would be no vengeance required.
shareWell even if he didn't blow up his house after Wick finished the job the guy still would be trying to kill him to "avenge" his sister. Wick would still probably be out to kill the main bad guy either way.
shareBored?? No.
How can someone be bored with John Wick 2 i don't get it.
My YOUTUBE channel https://www.youtube.com/user/MrTheExpendables3
I’m sure there is a LOT that you “don’t get.” Including sex.
shareI agree half with you.
After the opening scene things were slow. Very slow.
Until the end of Rome and in New York you got more speed in the acfion and story.
Good movie, but it took a while to go full throttle.
Rome was good, but too dark.
This page will make you a smarter member --> http://www.imdb.com/help/boards/markup
I agree. I really liked the first one, but I walked out of this one wondering why I'd wasted my time and money.
share