Patient Zero (Spoiler 2/1/17 episode)

You are quoting me, saying the same thing as me, and then stating that I am wrong.

I never said being Patient Zero means he is sick. It means he is the initial carrier of the diseased population. We are saying the same thing--Patient Zero is the source of the virus.

It doesn't matter if it lays dormant. The description did not say, "41 hours from onset of symptoms" it stated "41 hours from exposure." By definition, that 41 hour timeline must be earlier from his girlfriend's death so, like I correctly stated the first time, we are either looking at a flashback or a continuity error.

If he was exposed to the virus 1/1/2017 at 12am, we are watching him hand the ball to the boy 41 hours later. No one is claiming that he is going to die in 7 hours, which is the point you seem to be confused in addressing. The issue is that under no circumstances could the girl who died first been exposed to the virus prior to 1/1/2017 at 12am or she would be Patient Zero, but we know she died 48 hours after exposure.

Using that example timeline, we are watching events unfold in the hospital no sooner than 48 hours after 1/1/2017 12am *or* the description should have said "41 hours since onset of symptoms." If it had said that, although it did not, then it would match your example of dormant Ebola.

Also, you seem to not understand what a CDC classifies as a diseased population. It is not symptomatic populations. I suggest you clarify for yourself some of these facts before attempting to correct me again, especially when you merely reiterate what I already wrote and then incorrectly assess my points as false. That is one of the most bizarre ways to try and communicate.

If you actually watched it, how could you possibly have missed the description stated 41 hours since exposure?