MovieChat Forums > God's Not Dead 2 (2016) Discussion > Kurt is Gone? :(

Kurt is Gone? :(

posted 7 years ago by LenaAFoster
35 replies | jump to latest

Looks like Kurt deleted all his posts.  Well I for one will miss him as I will miss all of you. I did find Jan El Senor over on Imdb2 posting on the Politics or Religion board telling the Star Wars folks to come over.

I signed up and already posted under politics. I don't think the set up is too bad as you can actually imbed pictures and gifs I think without having to click on to see them. Might take a while to get used to but that site is growing fast. Lol.

Amazing to me and a beautiful thing the way folks are finding alternatives. Anyway, Kurt, if you are still around, will miss you and take care!

God bless!

Galena

*Free speech opinion w/ pseudonym internet moniker w/o malice for debate and discussion🌈

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Looks like Kurt deleted all his posts.

No he hasn't.

[–] LenaAFoster 7 years ago

How do you know?

[–] LenaAFoster 7 years ago

Ok. I turned off my phone and I had to log back in and he went on ignore. Lol! That's why Lena is NOT in charge of starting groups!

Galena

*Free speech opinion w/ pseudonym internet moniker w/o malice for debate and discussion🌈

[–] Jan_El_Senor 7 years ago

I've actually accidentally ignored people a few times using the mobile app, which is one of the many reasons I rarely use it.

Perpetual outrage is the most popular religion today.

[–] Jan_El_Senor 7 years ago

I still see Kurt's posts.

The format on the alt board is a little different, but a dedicated group for fans of The Shield used it years back, and it was fun. I hope it catches on, because it's a fun place to hang out.

I'll miss these boards, arguments and all. It's been a fun decade....

Perpetual outrage is the most popular religion today.

[–] LenaAFoster 7 years ago

Yes. It has been fun. I'm thrilled to see the IMDB folks moving elsewhere in groups to continue the discussion rather than just going to the generic "likes" of a Facebook page.

It's like Montgomery Ward and KMart. Everyone warned those companies not to take their clients for granted. We will see how this turns out. I doubt they will have 250 million visitors on February 21.

Take care Jan. I'll be seeing you around. At least I know where you post. 

Galena

*Free speech opinion w/ pseudonym internet moniker w/o malice for debate and discussion🌈

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

I still see Kurt's posts.

This. If his posts are still there, and his account is still there, then he hasn't deleted anything.

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

I'm still here.

Went over to another page to gather up a crew of friends to meet on Facebook, now that Cosmo ruined IMDb for all of us.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

now that Cosmo ruined IMDb for all of us.

To be fair kurt, I did warn you about accusing people of being paedophiles simply for defending a woman who is well into her twenties against your misogyny didn't I!

So how are you going to satiate your desire to be insulting towards atheists now? Not to forget insulting Brits, anyone you can make homophobic slurs against, regardless of their sexual preferences, stating bizarre anti evolution nonsense such as the 'Atheism' thread, insults against Christians you don't agree with, insults against Jehovah's Witnesses? Are you actually going to go around saying half the crap you do on here to people's faces, or are you secretly a better individual than you're ever revealed on here? I doubt you'd be this rude in real life, but let us not forget that civility is my pet issue, it's not something you have any interest in.

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

To be fair kurt, I did warn you about accusing people of being paedophiles simply for defending a woman who is well into her twenties against your misogyny didn't I!

Well she announced on SNL last night that she's proudly gay, so you don't stand a chance with her unless you're transgender. You seem to be everything else.

So how are you going to satiate your desire to be insulting towards atheists now? Not to forget insulting Brits

I'm sure you'll sniff me out somewhere since I'm your only friend.

nonsense such as the 'Atheism'

They're as thick as flies on Facebook.

but let us not forget that civility is my pet issue

Hypocrite comment straight out of the Trump handbook.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

you don't stand a chance with her unless you're transgender

Can't help yourself can you kurt. I'd be worried if I was you, with this sort of attitude of being an arse right to the end then you've got no chance of getting into heaven. Fortunately for you it's more than highly unlikely that any sort of god or heaven even exists, so you should be alright.

I'm sure you'll sniff me out somewhere since I'm your only friend.

 Have you given up on scouring through my posting history yet?

They're as thick as flies on Facebook.

Odd that you say this seeing as how you're on Facebook and I'm not. So are you finally admitting that your OP on there was copy and pasted from a fundamentalist site and was there simply so you could try and get into arguments with atheists then?

Hypocrite comment straight out of the Trump handbook.

So did you not say "civility is your pet issue, not mine" last time I actually tried being civil towards you? I think you did.

the Trump handbook.

I bet that's inspirational reading for you isn't it? But of course, Trump is actually a liberal who doesn't seriously want to be president according to you. How's that working out for your country?

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

How's that working out for your country?

How is it working out for your planet, dork? Anyone ever introduce you to the phrase 'political repercussions'?

Environmentally speaking, you do realize that the future of stopped Global Warming is now in the hands of China?

Again...I didn't vote for Trump.

you've got no chance of getting into heaven. Fortunately for you it's more than highly unlikely that any sort of god or heaven even exists, so you should be alright

Amazing that you worry about my spiritual salvation when you don't believe that people have spirits in the first place.

Would you like to be my mom?

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Dear the point

I would like to apologise on behalf of kurt for once again taking a massive swerve in order to avoid having to face you. Please forgive him, he knows not what he does, for he was born without the gift of self-awareness.

Sincerely yours

Someone who doesn't believe in the nonsense of spiritual salvation but kind of cares about the fact that someone who shares the planet with him happens to be so hate filled and would like to see him become a decent human being who has more in his life than anger towards atheists one day. And Brits. And gay people. And women. And any Christian who believes a bit differently from him. And until that happens I'll be keeping a close look out for flying pigs as they'll likely occur sooner.

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

Dear the point



I would like to apologise on behalf of kurt

Are you making a point with "Dear" God, or speaking on behalf of your "Dear" imaginary fan club here?

towards atheists one day. And Brits. And gay people. And women.

LOL I don't hate anyone on your list. "Dear to the Point" or Deer with points, the only annoyance has been you primarily cosmo.

 Deer to point gets the hint?

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Are you making a point with "Dear" God

Who said anything about God?

speaking on behalf of your "Dear" imaginary fan club here?

Honestly kurt, it's fine that you don't understand what I was saying and why.

Deer to point gets the hint?

I have no idea what you mean by 'Deer' to point. Don't suppose it's worth asking for an explanation?

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

Are you making a point with "Dear" God

Who said anything about God?

Then it's confirmed. You made an incoherent sentence.

Honestly kurt, it's fine that you don't understand what I was saying and why.

You made grammatical errors, dope.

Don't suppose it's worth asking for an explanation?

Now you're just making a public fool of yourself.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Then it's confirmed. You made an incoherent sentence.

This genuinely makes no sense, and in no way explains why you added the word God after quoting me saying dear. Honestly, what are you on about? Or are you just being arsey for the sake of it, because that's the only way you know how to communicate?

You made grammatical errors, dope.

Go on then, seeing as how you seem to think you've finally got a grasp of the English language, what are they? I can spot one instance in which a comma may have made it flow a bit better, but wasn't really needed. What grammatical errors (it's a plural remember) do you think you've spotted.

Now you're just making a public fool of yourself.

So you can't explain yourself? Well I guess there's no point in changing the habit of a lifetime is there.

edited to get rid of auto-typing mistakes made by Apple

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

You're an idiot.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Surprise surprise, Kurt goes on about some errors, along with making a comment that makes no sense, and as soon as he's asked to explain any of it or actually point out the non-existent errors he turns to insults. Have you ever had anything constructive to add to a conversation?

I repeat: So you can't explain yourself? Well I guess there's no point in changing the habit of a lifetime is there.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Don't worry kurt, I've figured out what you think the grammatical error was, though I am admittedly disappointed in myself for not working it out sooner. You think that I made a mistake writing 'dear' instead of 'deer', because you're an imbecilic, moronic bigot who never took those English lessons I suggested to you, even though they would greatly benefit your life. It has to be that as it's the only possible reason for you to have started off with all that "Deer with points" and "Deer to point gets the hint?" nonsense, that has no meaning to anyone or anything.

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

I've figured out what you think the grammatical error was

It's nearly incorporated into every one of your posts, dipstick.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Yet never any examples. How odd.

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

A perfect example is the announcement IMDb gave you, with the result of what your mindless blather does to this fine site.

"After in-depth discussion and examination, we have concluded that IMDb's message boards are no longer providing a positive, useful experience for the vast majority of our more than 250 million monthly users worldwide."

And that's the handiwork of militant atheist protests that never end on numerous IMDb boards that never invited your mindless criticism.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

You really are a bizarrely deluded individual. I repeat, never any examples, of any of your fabricated criticisms as it happens.

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

You really are a bizarrely deluded individual.

Then leave

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Then leave

Does it bother you that people worship 'God', rather than you seeing as how you have a massive god complex? Does it also bother you that you've never had any form of control over this site, no matter how much you wish you did>

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

Does it bother you that people worship 'God', rather than you seeing as how you have a massive god complex?

Doctors can have a "god complex", you fool.

And no I'm not bothered by people worshiping God, which is another stupid question on your part.

you've never had any form of control over this site

I don't recall stating I wanted to control the site.

Kind-a looks like everyone lost control of the site, Mr. No Awareness.

But for you and the other Brit atheists to waste this much time trolling religious film boards is pathetic and amusing.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Doctors can have a "god complex", you fool.

Based on what? And are you now claiming to be a doctor? Of all your lies that would be the most ridiculous, mr I used to work at the local sheriffs office.

I don't recall stating I wanted to control the site.

Not specifically, but the fact that you've spent years telling atheists to leave the site strongly suggests that's what you want.

Kind-a looks like everyone lost control of the site, Mr. No Awareness.

Nobody ever had control of the site kurt, it's not publicly owned. And you accuse others of having no awareness.

But for you and the other Brit atheists to waste this much time trolling religious film boards is pathetic and amusing.

Who's trolling? You've admitted to trolling the Kristen Stewart board, whereas we were all just happy talking on here. That's not trolling,

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

Based on what? And are you now claiming to be a doctor?

Yes, I am. But I can't recommend medication for the dead in your case.

Not specifically, but the fact that you've spent years telling atheists to leave the site strongly suggests that's what you want.

You and the deviant seem to be suffering from the same delusion. I simply suggested that you militant atheists might care to leave the GND board(S) if you're so unhappy. I wasn't ordering you pathetic fools to leave. Stay and continue to make fools of yourself. In light of the fact that you characterized me to being a fool, perhaps you publicly presented your own IQ limitations as well. Who knows, but I'm still married cosmo, so your motives are anyone's guess as to why you English muffins feel so threatened by me.

You've admitted to trolling the Kristen Stewart board,

Wrong again....I simply stated on the Stewart board that she ruined the Twilight saga films, and discussions about Stewart blossomed. You followed me to the Stewart board because you missed me so much, and then discussed the Stewart board on the GND boards, which was rather queer of you and deviates. Normal people would have commented on the Stewart board instead of glare at comments like peeping toms. lol You and the deviant should really get lives.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

are you now claiming to be a doctor?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I am.


I'm sorry kurt, but even in America one needs to have enough intellect to understand basic logic and sentences, at the very least, to even get close to becoming a doctor.

simply suggested that you militant atheists might care to leave the GND board(S) if you're so unhappy

I don't think it's the atheists on here who are unhappy kurt, we all seem happy enough killing a bit of time on here. You're the one who's constantly complaining about everything.

In light of the fact that you characterized me to being a fool, perhaps you publicly presented your own IQ limitations as well.

One does not need to be an idiot in order to communicate with idiots. That's not how it works.

Who knows, but I'm still married cosmo, so your motives are anyone's guess as to why you English muffins

Are you still pretending not to be a bigoted homophobic?

which was rather queer of you and deviates.

You think it's queer to point out your hypocrisy?

You and the deviant should really get lives.

Neither of us (and must you continue with the childish nickname?) spend anywhere near as much time on here as you do kurt.

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

one needs to have enough intellect to understand basic logic and sentences, at the very least

Now you know your shortcomings.

I don't think it's the atheists on here who are unhappy

You ladies complained about the two GND films but didn't watch them.

You were outraged because you thought the films were created as an insult to atheism.

Your militant atheist brothers blame the world problems on religion and consider religion to be mind pollution, even if you claim not to.

Sounds like unhappiness to me.

One does not need to be an idiot in order to communicate with idiots.

I thought that was the atheist club motto. Birds of a feather...nick pick together

Are you still pretending not to be a bigoted homophobic?

I couldn't care less where you put his sticky wicket. But you still haven't explained why you follow me around everywhere, thus the reason I assume you're looking for a date. Remember the Stewart board? You didn't even post there, but you did your Peeping Tom thing to obsess over my comments.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Now you know your shortcomings.

"I know you are, but what am I?" Trapped with the mentality of a 6 year year old aren't you kurt?

You ladies complained about the two GND films but didn't watch them.

Ignoring your sexism and homophobia (not a bigot my arse!), I've not complained about GND 2 at all, and my complaints about the first GND were all entirely based on the quality of the film and nothing else, as opposed to your love for it being that there 'are no atheists in the films'. And no atheists existing is the dream for you isn't it kurt?

You were outraged because you thought the films were created as an insult to atheism.

I was disappointed because GND was a poorly written film, with too many irrelevant storylines and terrible music. No outrage was felt at this end.

Your militant atheist brothers blame the world problems on religion and consider religion to be mind pollution, even if you claim not to.

Claiming to know what people are really thinking? You've gone full on into the belief that you're actually God haven't you, you deluded bigot?

Sounds like unhappiness to me.

kurt mode initiated
Practising psychology without a licence?
kurt mode disengaged

I couldn't care less where you put his sticky wicket.

Classic response to an accusation of you being homophobic.

you follow me around everywhere...

...Remember the Stewart board?

Remember when you followed me to, and tried arguing with me on FilmGeneral and RFS, whilst spending several months wading through my comment history? Then seemingly did the same with Film, whilst complaining that deviates didn't have much of a comment history for you to be able to follow him around. Were you really that desperate for the attention of atheists?

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

Remember when you followed me to, and tried arguing with me on FilmGeneral and RFS

I stated that you ridicule people of faith on all boards whenever the chance arises.

Your response to my comment was: "Prove it!!!"

So in less than 20 minutes, I did prove it by picking random message boards, and there you were, insulting and victimizing people of faith, just as I predicted.

I've never spent more than 25 minutes looking at your comment history because it's so predictable, pathetic and aggressive.

And when you're treated the same way as you treat others, you learn nothing from it.

Actually I don't really think you're gay.

I think you're sitting in your flat all alone. Sneering at the rest of the world via the internet.

Then seemingly did the same with Film, whilst complaining that deviates didn't have much of a comment history for you to be able to follow him around.

Film and deviates gave me the same challenge. To find other boards where they ridiculed people of faith. Film's ridicule comments on other boards were easy to find. About 20 minutes to find his insults directed at other victims.

Deviates on the other hand is obsessed with GND and GND2 boards, because he thinks like a spider, assuming his victims will end up on the GND & GND2 boards at some point caught in his web.

See cosmo, you can't even lie your way out of it.

[–] CosmopolitanHobo 7 years ago

Your response to my comment was: "Prove it!!!"

So in less than 20 minutes, I did prove it by picking random message boards, and there you were, insulting and victimizing people of faith, just as I predicted.

Except that you think any disagreement with someone is an insult, or ridicule, or berating, because you don't actually know what any of those things are. As was explained to you, which you would have seen as you went following me around, I never made any comments about religion, or anyone's beliefs on RFS. I had a disagreement with someone about adoption, and called a couple of people out for their homophobia, which would explain why you took issue with it. But it was a comment on a thread discussing some aspect of porn, I think, that you tried arguing with me on. Hell, you tried arguing with me on FG in regards to Brexit, so don't tell me you've never spent more than twenty five minutes when those occasions happened several days apart.

when you're treated the same way as you treat others, you learn nothing from it.

Well I certainly learned that treating you with civility is a waste of time, because it's something you've got no interest in.

I think

You're delusional about a great many things kurt.

To find other boards where they ridiculed people of faith. Film's ridicule comments on other boards were easy to find.

And what did you always come back with? Insults by 'people of faith' towards Film, not the other way around. Kind of contrary to what you were attempting is it not?

See cosmo, you can't even lie your way out of it

As if you have any concept of what honesty or dishonesty are.

[–] kurt-2000 7 years ago

Simply more proof that you're a pathological liar.

So in less than 20 minutes, I did prove it by picking random message boards, and there you were, insulting and victimizing people of faith, just as I predicted.