MovieChat Forums > God's Not Dead 2 (2016) Discussion > Check out the Star vote for this film l...

Check out the Star vote for this film lol


6521 IMDb users have given a weighted average vote of 4.0 / 10

Demographic breakdowns are shown below.

Votes Percentage Rating
2044 31.3% 10
348 5.3% 9
320 4.9% 8
296 4.5% 7
209 3.2% 6
163 2.5% 5
126 1.9% 4
113 1.7% 3
248 3.8% 2
2654 40.7% 1


It's filthy atheist scum complaining about the film, verses people of faith.

Oh funny. Just like GND. And only a little over 6,500 voted. Proof that IMDb is overrun with atheists.

reply

Proof that IMDb is overrun with atheists.


It is actually proof that IMDB is "overrun" with people who have far better taste in movies than ideological idiots like you.

reply

ideological


I didn't vote for Trump, stupid.

Proof you don't even know what ideology means.

reply

I didn't vote for Trump, stupid.


You are still an ideological nutcase with no taste in movies.

reply

ideological


Copy and post the ideological comments if you know what the word means.

no taste in movies


Not everyone shares your taste in porn.

reply

Do the demographics indicate what the participants religious persuasions are then?

reply

Yes, the demographics indicate that stupid Brit atheists who have no lives of their own voted one star for this film.

You're welcome.

reply

So the man who regularly starts threads with the intention of insulting and arguing with those who don't believe the same as him is accusing others of having no lives of their own. You truly are a peculiar individual kurt.

reply

You're the one who keeps responding to my posts cosmo-ironic-hobo.

reply

Yeah, but I'm not the one going around claiming I don't care about everything. I get a fair bit of amusement from you, so that free's me up to reply to you whenever I want to because I have no emotional attachment to this website and don't take it personally, unlike yourself.

reply

Yeah, but I'm not the one going around claiming I don't care about everything.


Neither did I, so I have no idea what you're ranting about.

I get a fair bit of amusement from you


You're about as funny as delirium.

because I have no emotional attachment to this website and don't take it personally, unlike yourself.


When you first showed up here you admitted that you hadn't even seen the flick. I didn't take your comments about the film as intellectually significant either.

reply

Neither did I, so I have no idea what you're ranting about.


Still not ranting, but it wasn't you who said to me: "Why do you think I care" and "No one cares either" (and it's clear you always seem to project yourself onto everyone else for some reason). It's also pretty clear that you always fall back on the 'I have no idea what you're saying' when you've flat out forgotten things you've said yourself previously.

You're about as funny as delirium.


I'm not trying to be funny, so it's quite flattering that even you still don't think I'm being funny unintentionally, it's just a shame that the same can't be said of you.

When you first showed up here you admitted that you hadn't even seen the flick.


No, because I joined in a discussion regarding the UK general election, so seeing the film wasn't relevant to that. This has also been explained to you multiple times before. Perhaps you should start writing things on post it notes and leaving them around your computer so that you don't keep forgetting all this stuff.

reply

Add 'demographics' to the list of things you don't understand.

reply

Add humor to the list you don't understand.

reply

Add humor to the list you don't understand.

I'm familiar with the Hippocratic and Galenic theories but I wouldn't call myself an expert.

reply

I would never confuse you with being an expert on anything either.

reply

I would never confuse you with being an expert on anything either.

You're easily confused, so never say never. Hell, you've confused 12 with mid-20s recently.

reply

http://www.celebzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/kristen-stewart-at-a-photoshoot-in-la_1.jpg

^ this is basically what a 12 year old girl looks like in the States. Twenty something in the U.K.? Low standards on your island ol' chap.


She made $70 million from the Twilight saga films where she playing the lead in five films, and she wasn't worth it. She can't act and she snorts through her nose all the time when she laughs.

Talented ?


no....

reply

You are truly pathetic.

reply

You are truly pathetic.


And you are childish deviates. Get a life.

reply

And you are childish deviates.

I can't take that seriously given your recent behaviour.

reply

I can't take that seriously given your recent behaviour.


then why do you keep following me around?




I couldn't care less about your future. - FilmFlaneur

reply

then why do you keep following me around?

A question that explains your recent especially troll-like behaviour.

reply

A question that explains your recent especially troll-like behaviour.



There is no explanation for your troll-like behavior or why you invested so much time reading my comments on the Stewart board.
Or why you couldn't address issues on the appropriate board. Needed your friends to protect you?


"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates

reply

There is no explanation for your troll-like behavior

Right back at ya.

reply

I was minding my own business on the Stewart board and you wanted to converse. So stop whining.

"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates

reply

Come now, Kurt, it wasn't your own business that took your interest.

reply

MONTHS AGO I went to the Kristen Stewart board to discuss the Twilight films, because I didn't think an actress who made $70 million from those five films did a good job. I have a right to bring up that talking point. Six other members agreed with me. That is my business. If you and cosmo were honest, you would have contributed on the Stewart board, and not this board.

You're busted for being inappropriate in how you handled the whole thing from the start. And I'm disappointed in you.

I know cosmo does things behind people's backs, but you of all people?

"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates

reply

You're busted for being inappropriate in how you handled the whole thing from the start. And I'm disappointed in you.

You're not one of my parents, your disappointment carries little weight. You'd commented on someone else's behaviour on other boards previously, I responded in kind. Your displeasure seems to come from tasting your own medicine.

reply

I know cosmo does things behind people's backs


Oh goody, it's time to ask kurt for examples and then watch as none are forthcoming. Examples please?

reply

You followed me to the Kristen Stewart board, behind my back and misquoted most of my posts.

There's your first examples.

"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates

reply

You followed me to the Kristen Stewart board, behind my back and misquoted most of my posts.


1) You were informed that your posting had been seen on the Kristen Stewart board.
2) It doesn't count as 'going behind someone's back' to look at a page on a website.
3) For a man who regularly quote mines you probably shouldn't make incorrect accusation of misquoting you, something I haven't done.

I'm after truthful things, not kurt's fantasy of events.

reply

kurt do you get your idea of what young people look like based on American high school movies, because you know that they almost always cast older than the part that's being played don't you?

reply

Here in the States we have a word to describe older guys who take an inordinate and persistent interest in the sexuality of specific much younger women with whom they have no relationship:
๎‚ฉCREEPY๎‚ฉ

reply

Here in the States we have a word to describe older guys who take an inordinate and persistent interest in the sexuality of specific much younger women with whom they have no relationship:


Why are you weighting in on a multi-member discussion from the Stewart board, here on the GND2 board, and leaving comments on the God's Not Dead board?

Sure looks like you're bringing more sour grapes into a discussion, Frog.

reply

163 2.5% 5


kurt only gave GND2 a vote of 5 himself, so clearly the atheist scum got to him.




I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

kurt only gave GND2 a vote of 5 himself, so clearly the atheist scum got to him.


I hadn't noticed that, so I changed it to 7 stars.

Thank you atheist scum.

๐Ÿ˜€

reply

I hadn't noticed that, so I changed it to 7 stars.


So you changed an initial honest review to one which fits better in with your claims here lol? Got it...

Thank you atheist scum.


Still with the personal charm offensive, I see.



I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

So you changed an initial honest review to one which fits better in with your claims here lol? Got it...


No. Frankly I believe that I initially clicked on the wrong button. I have no theory as to why I would have selected 5 since I enjoyed the film.


Still with the personal charm offensive, I see.



You earned it Muppet.

reply

I have no theory as to why I would have selected 5 since I enjoyed the film.


LOL


Muppet.


Glad to see you back on top of things again. I forgive you.


I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

LOL


I made a mistake and clicked on the wrong star selection.

๎€ฆ ๎€ฆ ๎€ฆ

Tee he he he he!

I forgive you.


Not what you said on the GND board.

reply

I made a mistake and clicked on the wrong star selection.


I am not even sure what this means. Is you rating of the present film settled now or will it increase the more unpopular it is rated by others here?

Not what you said on the GND board.


Please link to where I have ever said 'I do not forgive you' for your insults and rudeness. Perhaps this time there will be some substantiation?

It appears to me you might learn a little from a rule of forgiveness, let alone the Golden Rule, yourself.


I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

I am not even sure what this means. Is you rating of the present film settled now or will it increase the more unpopular it is rated by others here?


Why do you care, again?

'I do not forgive you' for your insults and rudeness. Perhaps this time there will be some substantiation?


You told cosmo my comments were unforgivable. But you had no problem with the stunts he pulled. Is this where you'd like to discuss the Kristen Stewart debates on an unrelated board like the others? Care to follow me to another board I hang out in and take it up on another GND board?

Here's where we sum up what you truly feel....



I couldn't care less about your future. - FilmFlaneur

reply

But you had no problem with the stunts he pulled.


Name one thing that is even remotely comparable?

reply

Is your name Film?

reply

Is your name Film?


Is 'Jesus' going to forgive a serial liar who insults everyone they converse with?

reply

You shouldn't feel insulted. You're just projecting again. You defended an actress that specializes in under aged roles in numerous films, and you stated she's attractive. I simply said that you echo the same argument made by the fanboys that want to have sex with her.

Hey if you find under aged girls cast in these roles to be appealing that's fine.

๎€ฒ

reply

You shouldn't feel insulted. You're just projecting again.


Not what projecting is kurt.

You defended an actress


I pointed out the misogyny of a bigot in regard to another human being. Not quite the same as defending an actress, but if you want to view it that way be my guest. And you seem to know far more about Kristen Stewart than I do.

Hey if you find under aged girls cast in these roles to be appealing that's fine.


So is she older but cast in 'under aged' roles or is she 'under aged' and cast in 'under aged roles'? Make your mind up.

reply

I pointed out the misogyny of a bigot in regard to another human being.


Are you characterizing yourself as the human being, or the pedos on the Stewart board that you defended while they were defending their right to lust for her skinny under aged body?


So is she older but cast in 'under aged' roles or is she 'under aged' and cast in 'under aged roles'?


YOU DOPE! SHE HAD MADE 20 FILMS BEFORE TURNING AGE 18 IN 2008!

What the frick is wrong with you!



"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates

reply

Are you characterizing yourself as the human being


First things first: ^ is proof positive that you don't understand the English language.

or the pedos on the Stewart board


So is everyone who posts over there a paedo then? How do you know old they all are? Maybe they're all under 18 themselves, maybe they're all just younger than Stewart is, maybe they're not stupidly bigoted and judgmental like you are?

reply

So is everyone who posts over there a paedo then?


Just the dopes that think she's a sweet, hot honey. Just like you before you decided to change your answer to: "I don't think she's attractive."

How do you know old they all are?


They have enough sophistication in their intellect to act over 30. More than likely old guys like you.

maybe they're not stupidly bigoted and judgmental like you are?


Maybe you're a cry baby again. Run to admin and whine, wuss.

reply

They have enough sophistication in their intellect to act over 30.


So the polar opposite of yourself then.

More than likely old guys like you.


Find yourself a mirror kurt, you're the old man who's out of touch with reality remember.

Maybe you're a cry baby again.


What in the Bible convinces you that it's acceptable to accuse people of paedophilia, simply for calling you out on your ridiculous bigotry? Anyway, accusing others of being 'cry babies' when it would be you who is constantly, and I mean constantly, claiming that atheist are being mean all for having the temerity to discuss, seemingly anything is quite absurd.

Run to admin and whine, wuss.


Yeah we get it kurt. You're a big tough guy who doesn't care, after all you've been wiped before right? What did happen to the kurtbrian account?

reply

What did happen to the kurtbrian account?


I no longer have that Facebook account. The Trump supporters attacked my FB page and claimed it was a phony account since I didn't have my own photo in the avatar.

accuse people of paedophilia


In the interest of Christmas spirit, as Frog said in his thread: I decided to apologize. I left a message there.


So then I take it you won't be joining me on any other IMDb pages in the future?

reply

I decided to apologize. I left a message there.


I saw that, and if it becomes believable that it's a genuine apology that's fine. As I said initially, we'll see how things go.

So then I take it you won't be joining me on any other IMDb pages in the future?


What are you reading to come to these conclusions?

reply

Then you'll be on the Rogue One and Jason Bourne boards?

next stops for me.

reply

Then you'll be on the Rogue One and Jason Bourne boards?


What on earth are you on about? Aside from the fact that I never got into the Bourne films and I've little interest in seeing another Star Wars prequel, why exactly will I be on those boards?

reply

I had no idea that you didn't like the Bourne or Star Wars films. Just guessed that you might since we rated many films the same.

reply

I had no idea that you didn't like the Bourne or Star Wars films.


To be fair The Empire Strikes Back is superb, and Star Wars and Return of the Jedi are both enjoyable enough, though I don't think particularly great. The prequels were varyig levels of terrible and I don't care about the new ones. They might be great, they might not, I'll find out in a few years when they come on telly I guess.

reply

Is your rating of the present film settled now or will it increase the more unpopular it is rated by others here?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Why do you care, again?


Because I am speaking to you and it is hard to get a view if you keep changing things.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'I do not forgive you' for your insults and rudeness. Perhaps this time there will be some substantiation?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


You told cosmo my comments were unforgivable


Fair enough. But even so, your comment was not addressed to me, which is what I was referring to when I say I often have to forgive you. And it is hard to take lectures about insults when almost every time I hear from you it is accompanied by name calling.

Is this where you'd like to discuss the Kristen Stewart debates on an unrelated board like the others?


To be honest my interests lie elsewhere. But, if movies aimed at teenage girls make you happy...

Here's where we sum up what you truly feel....



I couldn't care less about your future. - FilmFlaneur


Apart from being a straw man, this seems an odd thing to say. Why should I care about your future in particular? Is it in doubt? But then I guess as a confessed sinner who believes in Hell, perhaps it is just that you are projecting your metaphysical anxieties outwards.



I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

it is hard to get a view if you keep changing things.



Nothing has changed Muppet.

God is real and you're still a jackass.


often have to forgive you


Liar...


To be honest my interests lie elsewhere.


Then stop getting your back hairs up over Stewart and the discussion there, or join the discussion there. Cosmo didn't have the balls to direct his comments to the appropriate board. Do you? Oh that's right. In reality, you admitted that you really don't care anyway. Make up your mind.

But, if movies aimed at teenage girls make you happy...



All the science fiction I watch is well liked by teen boys. Are you attempting to say that I can only watch films designed for senior citizens? You don't believe in God, but claim to watch pro-Christian films. What is your argument?

Why should I care about your future in particular? - FilmFlaneur

Thank you. I'll show this to deviates as evidence.

"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates



But then I guess as a confessed sinner who believes in Hell, perhaps it is just that you are projecting your metaphysical anxieties outwards.



And then you complain when I do answer your questions. Make up your mind Muppet.

reply


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it is hard to get a view if you keep changing things.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Nothing has changed Muppet.


Just your rating of the film, very conveniently. But your use of insult certainly remains constant lol But I forgive you.

God is real


Based on what unambiguous evidence or proof? Oh sorry I forgot: you told me a while back that you "don't need evidence" - which means, presumably, no need proof either LOL

you're still a jackass.


And I still forgive you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
often have to forgive you
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liar...


That seems a little unfair when every exchange you pepper with personal insults. QED here since I find myself having to excuse you again.

stop getting your back hairs up over Stewart ... join the discussion there


It was the claim of paedophilia I was concerned about. But thanks for the invitation to discuss teenage movies, I think I will pass.

Cosmo didn't have the balls to direct his comments to the appropriate board. Do you? Oh that's right. In reality, you admitted that you really don't care anyway. Make up your mind.


I don't. I only take issue with claims of paedophilia by way of insult and implicit homophobia - especially from those who ought to set an example. But then I guess that would be asking too much.

All the science fiction I watch is well liked by teen boys. Are you attempting to say that I can only watch films designed for senior citizens? You don't believe in God, but claim to watch pro-Christian films. What is your argument?


My position is that I don't really care for teenage girl movies. If you want to, knock yourself out.

Why should I care about your future in particular? - FilmFlaneur

Thank you. I'll show this to deviates as evidence.


Evidence of what? Should I really care about the future of rude and aggressive stranger with questionable social attitudes on the internet?

"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates


Yes, you have said that before. What is the relevance here to me?

And then you complain when I do answer your questions


Critiquing and diagnosing is not complaining.

Muppet


I forgive you. Again.
I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

But thanks for the invitation to discuss teenage movies, I think I will pass.



At least now you confess that Stewart makes teen movies, and perverts want to screw her. You just removed yourself from a discussion you can't win anyway.


I kid you not, here's the stuff Film watches:

www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/

etc. etc.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/ < teen school girl

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0962826/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055074/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044515/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/



I only take issue with claims of paedophilia by way of insult and implicit homophobia - especially from those who ought to set an example. But then I guess that would be asking too much.


You wouldn't know since you admitted Stewart makes teen movies, and your buddy cosmo admitted that he finds her attractive. It just stands to reason. But your attraction to films with rape scenes wouldn't attract speculation for motive either.

What is the relevance here to me?


You said the same thing deviates said. Group thinking copy cats.


"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates

reply

At least now you confess that Stewart makes teen movies,


Since I still don't take much of interest in modern sagas aimed at teenage girls either way, then this 'confession' didn't take much effort.

and perverts want to screw her


I leave that between you and the perverts.

I kid you not, here's the stuff Film watches


Since you repeat all this, I repeat my answer from last time it appeared on the other board. You certainly seem to have a bee in your bonnet about this:

It is flattering that kurt has stalked me, waded through the literally several hundreds of different reviews I have on this site, to try and make the impression that his argument carries weight. OK, to show I care, here are the first four off that list which apparently so shock our kurt:

1. An early Michael Winner film, set around the delinquency at a seaside resort. It has teenagers, or young men in it, but it is hard to see this being made to appeal to an audience of teenage girls, and there is no sexual violence, other than mild threat that I can recall. It is more interested in making a social message.

2. An old sexploitation film. But even then, no teenage appeal that I can recall - and no teenagers either, the central character is a bored housewife.

3. A Japanese gore film. Yes the 'heroine' is a 'school girl' (albeit a pretty old and ruthless one) but that's a horror trope, common to the example of the asian genre we have here. Again, not likely to be of conventional interest to teenage girls - unless they are particularly adventurous and blood thirsty.

4. A nudist film from cult director Doris Wishman. Again, not really a teenage girl's thing and none appear. Titillating in an old fashioned way but no rapes to be seen. I should know since I have actually watched all these films.

I am sure if I also told kurt that I like Rashomon , The Virgin Spring, Once Upon a Time in America or whatever as well now, that he would only decry an overriding 'interest in rape' again. (He has after all already posted absurdly damning, thumbnail assessments of the contents of such films, top favourites of mine all, as Blade Runner , Peeping Tom , The Searchers and Apocalypse Now - a film incidentally that kurt gave a personal rating of 9 to on this very site!) I could go on; but why waste my time? One thing though: kurt's unique, and prurient, appraisal of cinema only goes to show, again, just how educational and entertaining he can prove.

Who is kidding who, kurt? LOL

You wouldn't know since you admitted Stewart makes teen movies, and your buddy cosmo admitted that he finds her attractive


Since you have told me that Stewart is not under age then I fail to see how merely being attracted to a film star is to be condemned - or why you make so much of it. But as I never visit, or comment, on boards presumably frequented by teenage and tweenage girls on IMDb I guess I won't ever, either.

You said the same thing deviates said.


Which probably ought to tell you that what you said seems irrelevant to at least two people.

I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

Since I still don't take much of interest in modern sagas aimed at teenage girls either way, then this 'confession' didn't take much effort.


Then you just admitted that you don't know what you're talking about in reference to the Kristen Stewart board discussion, so why do you rant over the board topic on this unrelated board?

The point was simple. Stewart, a $70 million dollar plus actress, specializes in being cast as an under aged teen in many of her films. In fact, the point could be made that her career has revolted around under aged casting roles. Again...I'm not a fanboy, since I don't like Stewart in most roles, but her fanboys on the Stewart board did state they're sexually attracted to her. ....an actress who plays under aged characters and still looks like she's 12. Although she's getting older so she'll have to change soon.

Had you known what you were even talking about, you wouldn't have to hide behind: 'Since I still don't take much of interest in modern sagas aimed at teenage girls." Which is a lie since you here ranting over her.

Which probably ought to tell you that what you said seems irrelevant to at least two people.


Then why are you and deviates obsessing over this subject? If you're attempting to tell me that you have better thinks to do with time, prove it.


Should I repost those dozen skin flicks that you have on your list of films you watched?

reply

Then you just admitted that you don't know what you're talking about in reference to the Kristen Stewart board discussion, so why do you rant over the board topic on this unrelated board?


I merely say - again - that I don't much of an interest in movies aimed at teenage girls and their stars and it seems you do, at least to go on about it on unrelated boards like these.

The point was simple. Stewart, a $70 million dollar plus actress, specializes in being cast as an under aged teen in many of her films. In fact, the point could be made that her career has revolted around under aged casting roles. Again...I'm not a fanboy, since I don't like Stewart in most roles, but her fanboys on the Stewart board did state they're sexually attracted to her. ....an actress who plays under aged characters and still looks like she's 12. Although she's getting older so she'll have to change soon.


QED. This seems to exercise you more than it ever will me, and here you protest too much.

I do however recognise, and care about paedophilic slurs when I see them especially when casually linked homosexuality. As for ranting, well, you've said that about people holding a firm, polite opinion - before you went off on one lol

Then why are you and deviates obsessing over this subject? If you're attempting to tell me that you have better thinks [sic] to do with time, prove it.


Well let's say it kills time while I am waiting for you to refute the purported proofs for the non-existence of God I have lately posted as to your request, or for you to trawl on through the rest of my several hundred reviews on site to then make more prurient remarks about 'rape centred' interest and 'dirty teen movies'.

Should I repost those dozen skin flicks that you have on your list of films you watched?


Better read my rebuttal first - and actually watch a film before you review it.

I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

that I don't much of an interest in movies aimed at teenage girls and their stars and it seems you do, at least to go on about it on unrelated boards like these.



But.....that's what you've been doing on GND and GND2? You've been going on about it.

Busted.

and here you protest too much.


It's no protest. She really did make $70 million dollars from the five Twilight film. Look it up if you don't believe me. And she didn't do a very good job, in my opinion, and in the opinion of six other people on the Stewart board. Which was the initial reason why I posted on that board to begin with months ago. Proof you didn't read or comprehend.
You have no idea what you're talking about.


I do however recognise, and care about paedophilic slurs when I see them especially when casually linked homosexuality.


And now you've elected yourself as Cosmo's dad? WTF? Ever stop to think that cosmo can take care of himself? He took the Stewart board debate to the GND boards so that his atheist support group could help him attack the evil troll Kurt. LOL LOL pantywaists...

As for ranting, well, you've said that about people holding a firm, polite opinion - before you went off on one lol


Is this you stating that you'd like to have 'do-overs' and have civil discussion? Do you think you could engage in such an enterprise? omg...lol

efute the purported proofs for the non-existence of God


You just stated that God is non-existent. Again...you've made it clear that you've made up your mind. The reasoning I offered a year ago was rejected by you. So we've covered that topic as well. Why do you rehash this? Are you requesting a formal essay from me, and do you promise to respect the content even though you'll reject my comments?

remarks about 'rape centred' interest and 'dirty teen movies'.

Better read my rebuttal first - and actually watch a film before you review it.


I'll be glad to re-post the list of your dozen cheesy sex films, but I'll use the studio description of the films, since they made the films. Not your liar 'opinion' on the films.

Should I re-post your list of 'perfectly acceptable films'? Make up your mind.

reply

that's what you've been doing on GND and GND2 .. You've been going on about it.


Just replying to your inestimable words of insight and wisdom, my friend which can continue at length.



It's no protest. She really did make $70 million dollars from the five Twilight film. Look it up if you don't believe me. And she didn't do a very good job, in my opinion, and in the opinion of six other people on the Stewart board. Which was the initial reason why I posted on that board to begin with months ago. Proof you didn't read or comprehend. You have no idea what you're talking about.


QED.

And now you've elected yourself as Cosmo's dad? WTF? Ever stop to think that cosmo can take care of himself?


I just objected to your paedophiliac implications. One imagines most would find them objectionable.

He took the Stewart board debate to the GND boards so that his atheist support group could help him attack the evil troll Kurt. LOL LOL pantywaists...


Still talking about her I see...

Is this you stating that you'd like to have 'do-overs' and have civil discussion?


A lack of your characteristic aggression and name calling would be nice, yes.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
efute the purported proofs for the non-existence of God
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You just stated that God is non-existent.


No, they were each proposed proofs expressed in logical form. The conclusion was the statement you mention. That is how logical proofs work, with a connected series of statements. Got that?

you've made it clear that you've made up your mind


A soft atheist may well have taken a view but admits he or she could be wrong. But you know that. since I have often told you.

Are you requesting a formal essay from me, and do you promise to respect the content even though you'll reject my comments?


Just engaging with the proofs offered after your demanding and an end to prurient and ill informed diversions would be fine, thanks.

I'll be glad to re-post the list of your dozen cheesy sex films, but I'll use the studio description of the films, since they made the films. Not your liar 'opinion' on the films


Off you go then. But the point will needs be that are to be made for teenage girls and that you can show that I enjoy them immorally over all other types of film. Good luck with that.

Should I re-post your list of 'perfectly acceptable films'?


Feel free. (I am not sure I have used the phrase 'perfectly acceptable' and in which case this is just another straw man is it not?) But I can only repeat that what is at issue here is whether I like current films aimed at the teenage girl market - at least enough to care about your obsessions, not whether I have ever watched and enjoyed cult, exploitation, Asian or 'weird' movies of all types and sizes, especially when I have told you that for one thing I have been paid to do so. The relation to my disinterest in Twilight et al seem tenuous, to say the least. But, knock yourself out lol. This just seems to be another case of you going off on one.



I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000

reply

Ok Film....as you requested. Your skin flick list of kink.


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/

Bad Johnson (2014)
4.5/10
A charismatic womanizer receives his comeuppance after his penis mysteriously leaves his body and takes human form. (88 mins.)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/

The Girl-Getters (1964)
7.1/10
In a seaside village, a group of local young men mingle among the seasonal tourists in search of sexual conquests... (93 mins.)
Director: Michael Winner

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/

57.
Hideout in the Sun (1960)
4.9/10
Two brothers rob a bank and take a young girl hostage. They find out that the girl is a nudist, so they force her to take them to a nudist colony so they can hide out. (70 mins.)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/

The Sexploiters

Taglines: A picture that goes beyond your imagination!
Genres: Drama
Certificate: Not Rated
Parents Guide: Add content advisory for parents ยป

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/

Bad Guy

In busy downtown Seoul, a thuggish young man notices a fresh-faced college student who sits on a bench. He stares then sits next to her. She looks at him as if he's vermin, rises and walks to another bench. He sits staring. Her boyfriend arrives, she points to the stranger, the boyfriend shrugs and puts his arm around her to walk away. The stranger starts to leave as well, turns, goes to them, takes her face firmly in his hands and kisses her long and hard. The boyfriend tries unsuccessfully to break them apart, then soldiers beat the stranger. She demands an apology. He is silent. She slaps him and spits on him. They leave. The next day, he sets out to ruin her.

Creepy - Film fantasy?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/

14.
Kitten with a Whip (1964)
4.6/10
A rising political star faces scandal and blackmail when the young woman he tries to help turns out to be a juvenile delinquent. (82

Teen flick for it time period.


Hey...I noticed you deleted some films. No problem, I'll check my list that I used in response to that moron deviates who claimed you didn't have skin or teen flicks. lol


Bingo! I found some the kinky flicks that Film deleted from his list. Including College Girls

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0123705/mediaviewer/rm1285101056?ref_=tt_ov_i

College Girls

Member Review: "here's really not too much of a plot here and we're basically greeted with small stories that all are centered around sex. One story is a girl doing poorly in school so she sleeps with her teacher to get good grades and this follows with the teacher going home and raping his unwilling wife. We get a couple other misfits who sleep with incoming football players and we also get a wild party at the end where LSD is dropped, which leads to a bunch of topless dancing. As far as sexploitation films go this one here isn't too bad, although if you're expecting something great then you need to stay away from this film as well as every sexploitation film made. The softcore scenes are all rather silly but there are a couple erotic ones, which is probably the best work I've seen from this director. Performances are all laughable as is the score but the only reason this film was made was to show off skin and it does a good job at that. Another bonus is the fact that the film only runs 65-minutes so it "


Film! you dirty pervert. lol


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/

'Hair High' [Film watches teen flicks]

"Hair High" is a gothic high-school comedy with a "Carrie"-like story. Cherri and Rod are the high-school king and queen and they justifiably rule their domain. Spud, the new kid in town, accidentally offends both Cherri and Rod and so is forced to become Cherri's slave. Naturally, they immediately hate each other, but of course later they fall in love. Cherri and Spud secretly decide to go to the prom together, and on prom night a rejected Rod forces their car off the road and into the lake. In true 50's ballad style, their car sinks to the bottom of the lake as they share one last kiss. While the bodies of Cherri and Spud lie in a timeless embrace, Rod is successful in thwarting any investigation and is able to get away with murder. On the night of the following year's prom, the car magically comes to life and slowly drives out of the lake with Cherri and Spud, as if nothing had happened, only this time their bodies are in an advanced state of decomposition.




I kid you not, here's the stuff Film watches:

www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/

etc. etc.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/ < teen school girl

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0962826/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055074/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044515/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/


Then you deleted two of the films on your list from yesterday out of embarrassment. lol

You didn't want anyone to see your viewing of 'College Girls"?

LOL

Busted.

reply

Kurt I am still struggling to work out the purpose of all this. Perhaps you can explain?

First of all, I have not 'deleted' any reviews yesterday or recently, so I am not sure how you came by that notion and you will need to substantiate it. I wait, as always lol... One also notes that you are the one who recently I remember, claimed a 'mistake' and increased your score for GND2 and gave Apocalypse Now a '9' while simultaneously decrying it. I am certainly not worried by anyone looking at the films I have watched or reviewed. Why should I be? There is nothing illegal, or shocking - except perhaps to the prurient and those who, apparently, don't watch much outside of Hollywood blockbusters or teenage girl cinema lol


Secondly , none of this shows that I have an interest in the contemporary vogue for teenage saga movies, or the actress Stewart, in whom you have such an abiding interest. Which was, and still is the point

Thirdly, as already pointed out, I have reviewed hundreds of films on this site, many of which were edited and carried over from another for which work I was paid. One can review a film without personally liking it or endorsing it, as I am sure you might understand.

Fourthly I am not sure why you are assuming such faux moral outrage against a whole swathes of different films of which one can take it you do not approve. You are entitled to your opinions, as am I, expressed in reviews perhaps, but your sweeping condemnations and disapproval of so many films (many of which, one suspects you have not even seen) is something only explicable to yourself. What is the purpose? As already noted some of your assessments of what are world classics have been risible.

Fifthly , a glance of the films you pull out above with a summary shows that none of them are of special interest to the teenage girl market. I couldn't be bothered to look up all the rest. They do, however reflect a gauche and hasty assessment of a variety and range of films, any adult content of which which apparently disturbs you.

Sixthly if it is true (and I didn't see the claim) that

deviates claimed you didn't have skin or teen flicks. lol


That is a matter better addressed to him. But even then these are reductive categories that I would argue with on a case-by-case basis. I have never said that none of my reviews contain sexploitation or films which might be watched by teens, so again I am not sure of the point you are making.

Seventhly If you are a person who can pan such obvious classics such as Apocalypse Now , The Searchers, Blade Runner et al then why would anyone take your assessments of anything seriously? I don't know either.

Eighth , if you really take great issue with such a large amount of cinema, then how is it you have assured us, only just recently, that you are "easily pleased"? lol

Lastly, if

I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000


What is this diatribe we see from you then?

I must say a wholesale moral attack on my viewing and reviewing history is a novelty, lol, even if laughably misconceived, one both ill-informed and blue-nosed. But then again, you ever are entertaining and educational, as I have said. I just ask what your point is, since I am not sure apart from your idea of 'good taste' - which will always be subjective and in your case, presumably informed by conservative moral and religious values. So much the worse for you, unfortunately.

reply

he would only decry an overriding 'interest in rape' again.


Oddly enough kurt really likes Alien, because he told me so, and rightly so I might add because it's superb. It's also a film that is almost entirely about rape, the writers of it even said as much, and it's full of sexual imagery. Therefore based on his distorted logic kurt likes, arguably even loves, films about rape.

reply