MovieChat Forums > The Handmaid's Tale (2017) Discussion > It not been said but the handmaids are s...

It not been said but the handmaids are slaves right


They seem to have avoided using the term slave but it seems clear that that is exactly what they are. i am surprised none of the handmaids particularly ofred has used the term slave.

reply

Well, all of them are slaves, really - the handmaids, the Marthas, the Jezebels, the unwomen sent to the colonies.

Even the wives have rooms in their own houses that they aren't allowed to enter, have to watch their husband f*ck a handmaid all the time, are obligated to all wear the same color, and the only way they can take a stroll outside is with a Guardian attached.

reply

Well yes to a degree but I think the fact the handmaids are not even allowed there own name puts them at bottom of the pile so to speak it is however the case that everyone except maybe the commanders has freedom restricted

reply

The commanders' freedom is also very limited, as I think the incident with the bomber and the aftermath illustrated pretty well.

They obviously don't have due process in Gilead, which in itself is a gross violation of human rights.

reply

Another thing I thought of when watching this week's episode: I don't think the commanders (or their wives, but I guess that's irrelevant) are allowed NOT to want to have kids. Like, can they not take on a handmaid if they choose to? I suppose only if there aren't enough handmaids for everybody.

You just really can't choose how you live your life in this society, which brought me to open my topic on the subject.

reply

I would agree that most of the people in Gilead are slaves of the state. They are not the property of any particular individuals, but rather are assigned to serve the various commanders by the state.

Even Nick, a driver, soldier, spy, guard has very little freedom. He lives with his commander, had no personal life and was assigned a wife. What would have happened to him if he refused his child bride?

reply

In effect, their status is little better than slavery, but I guess technically slavery involves the classification of a living human being as chattel property, thus not as human beings. I think all persons in the plot are treated as human beings, however, the issue is that we are dealing with a theocracy, and a highly dictatorial one at that. So essentially everyone's freedoms are extremely limited (some more than others), as everyone must live according to the dictates of what the leaders consider God's commands.

reply

Well, don't they provide slave labor, though? I mean, it's not like the handmaids or the Marthas are actually getting paid, are they?

reply

the handmaids are not treated as human beings.

reply

They are worse off than slaves were in the past. I read that Offred (or the author) even said that Handmaids were just seen as a uterus with legs (which is actually how many sand rats view women in the Middle East). Even in ancient times, slaves (even female ones) could have their own names and be allowed to do things these Handmaids are not.

reply