MovieChat Forums > rtrlocations > Replies
rtrlocations's Replies
She's Kevin's blonde sister and in the first one she calls him les incompentant. Another actress plays her in the sequel and maybe has 1 line and reddish hair.
Oh thanks! While I was in LA and San Francisco last month, I visited a bunch of new places so lots of stuff to come!
Yes, hopefully minimal changes.
You're welcome!
The house is going to be rented out for special events and weddings.
Thanks! Yeah, it's nice when things stay the same.
Saw it at the 40 Years of Terror Convention last week. It was good, not great, but certainly better than Rob Zombie's efforts and Halloween 5. It had Friday the 13th style gore and dialogue but not a lot of suspense and a stupid plot twist that is swept quickly under the rug. Saw it for a second time last night, opinion hasn't changed much. John Carpenter's score is great. Overall, not as good as the reviews and trailer hype it up to be.
You're welcome! I didn't talk to any homeowners. I am not invested in this sequel so I just grabbed some quick shots.
Oh, you killed me with that one. I guess you're one of the deplorables that got the imdb boards shut down. Keep up the good work. And take a grammar and spelling class.
It seems to me you're clueless. Laurie Strode was 17 in 1978, which would've made her birth year 1961, two years BEFORE he killed Judith in 1963. If she was his sister all along like you claim, that throws out your no contact to that house theory.
You do realize that scene in the sanitarium where SISTER is written on the door is not a deleted scene from Halloween, but a scene shot specifically for the 1981 TV premiere of Halloween, don't you? They had to edit out over 3 minutes or so of footage to meet standards and practices, which left the running time short. The scenes where Loomis pleads with the two psychiatrists, the SISTER scene and Lynda visiting Laurie after being followed were all shot in 1981 during the filming of Halloween II to replace what was cut. That's why Laurie's hair is in a towel because Jamie Lee's hair was much shorter and why she had to wear a wig in Halloween II.
Michael never learns he has a second sister in the original because she didn't exist.
Of course he murdered "noone" else. He was caught by his parents 30 seconds afterward. He went to Haddonfield because that's the only place he knew. But he didn't go to Laurie, she came to him. If Devon Graham dropped off a key, Michael would've gone after him.
If there was supposed to be some connection, there would've been some sort of reaction from Laurie when her father asked her to drop off the key or when she walked up to the house to indicate that it was a place that she had memories of or meant something to her. There was none of that. It was just the neighborhood spook house and she was in the wrong place at the wrong time. That was her fate.
Find me just 2 people who walked out of the theater in 1978 who thought she was his sister and get back to me.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Halloween was originally made with no intention of having a sequel. Michael stalked Laurie with no motive and THAT's what makes it scary. Not knowing why they are doing it is way more terrifying than some elaborate explanation at the end of the movie.
John Carpenter and Debra Hill reluctantly agreed to do Halloween II, partly as a pay day. John Carpenter thought up the brother/sister connection over six pack of beer late one night in 1981 when he was writing the screenplay and had hit a roadblock. He's said it in several interviews (one of which I was at).
Thanks! Yeah, that is TV magic for you.
You're welcome! Most likely because of the tax incentives Georgia has been offering productions to film here.
Thank you!