MovieChat Forums > bigben > Replies
bigben's Replies
Go after their families how? Does that include children? Does that mean it's okay for people to attack Barron Trump then?
Really? So saying homosexuality should be illegal isn't evil? Not allowing a mother to see her child because she was a lesbian isn't evil? Claiming 9/11 and Sandy Hook were deserved punishments from God isn't evil? And blaming gays for them isn't evil? And that's without the perverted, creepy behavior. You seriously don't think he even comes close to being evil? Keep in mind he said all gays are inherently evil.
I'm asking if you have any problem with the things I mentioned. Do you not think it was disrespectful to mock POW's? Do you not think defending Nazi's was wrong? I'm not saying you have to support Hillary.
You really would defend Roy Moore? Have you seen the things he's said and done? Yes, he is evil. He is full of hate. How can you disagree?
So none of the other things I mentioned about Trump you have a problem with? Not even a small one?
An A? Really? Even if you ignore all his faults, what has he done? He's failed to repeal Obamacare three times now because his replacement was even worse. He's gone all out in support for two big elections in Virginia and Alabama and both candidates lost. He's going back on his promises, like Mexico would pay for his wall. How can you give him an A?
Plus, look at all the bad things he's done. He's a full blown hypocrite when it comes to the military. I mean he hates NFL players kneeling because it's disrespectful, but remember when he mocked John McCain for being a POW? And then proceeded to mock every POW? How about how he outright lied about there being 3 million fraudulent votes, and that Obama wiretapped him? He never produced a shred of evidence for either. How about how he gave his full support to Roy Moore, who besides being an alleged sexual assaulter and pervert, is a genuinely evil human being? How about he refuses to come down hard against f-cking Nazi's, and says many of them are good people?
Have the balls to admit he's had a messed up first year, and acknowledge that he's done a lot wrong.
Dominic Purcell said discussions for a sixth season have started.
Your own quote proves you wrong. "An INSECT that must be squashed quickly". She viewed Jack as nothing more than an insect. Even after he saved Rose. The reason? Because he was poor. If he had been a young rich man, she'd have had zero problem with him right then. But because he wasn't rich, she despised him and didn't want any association with him at all, even if it was just thanking him for saving Rose from dying.
You totally disregard Rose's mindset of a controlled and abused teenager and don't even try to understand why the actions of Ruth and Cal and would push her away from them and to Jack, as the other poster pointed out. You just call her a skank and leave it at that. How pathetic.
LOL, you're so funny. I hope you're trolling and are purposely being a hypocrite. Imagine getting so worked up and angry at other people over a character in Titanic. I actually pity you. You must have a very sad and lonely life.
The corn syrup was all over his body. Messy eater? Seriously? Nobody would think that. They'd find out it wasn't real blood when they made him see a doctor that same night. Now, would they automatically think he faked his death before killing Sydney and her dad and framing him? Probably not, but it would raise questions at the very least, and since Billy had gone completely insane by that point, there's a good chance he'd screw up his answers.
Also, when it was all said and done, more than just the local police would be involved. Before the party deaths, there were only two victims, Casey and Steve. If Billy and Stu succeeded, the principal, Tatum, Randy, Dewey, Sydney, Kenny, and Gale would all be dead. Plus Sydney's dad, who they framed. So that's six murders, five at one location, in one night, plus the death of the "killer", and two live victims. That would be national news and the F.B.I or state police would absolutely be called to investigate as well, even if the local police were convinced they had the killer and he was dead.
No. There was way too much evidence they didn't think about.
1. If Sydney's dad had been tied up and gagged for two days, police and forensics would be able to tell. They'd see tape marks on his mouth from his gag and probably on his arms and legs even though the tape was over his clothes, so they'd know he'd been tied up for a long time which would cause suspicion.
2. They planned on shooting Sydney's dad and making it look like a suicide, but I guarantee they wouldn't be able to fool an ME once an exam was done on the body. It's hard to face a suicide with a gun. ME's can tell when someone tries to make it look someone shot themselves but didn't. Billy and Stu probably would have just held the gun close to his head and fired, not realizing there would need to be gunpowder on her dad's hands and the gun would have to land in exactly the right spot. Plus, they'd find both of their prints and the fake blood on the gun, proving they both held it. That would poke a huge hole in their story.
3. Billy was covered in fake blood. The police would make him see a doctor, who'd be able to tell most of the "blood" wasn't real. That would raise suspicion.
4. Most importantly, there's no way Billy and Stu would be able to keep their act and stories straight. They did get away with killing Maureen and framing Cotton and did good at not getting caught for killing Casey and Steve, but by the end of the movie both of them were batsh-t crazy. They had completely lost it. If they were the only two survivors of a massacre, they'd be grilled for every detail. They'd either mix up what they were saying, let something slip, or let their true personalities get out. Billy did bet past being interrogated before by the police, but he knew his phone didn't make the calls, Stu would call Sydey which would make people think he couldn't be the killer, and he planned that all out. He had no alibis or outs after this. As soon as the police discovered the first three points and confronted the two about them, they'd screw up.
And Ruth wasn't rude and inconsiderate and didn't care about other people's feelings? Seriously? She didn't give a damn how Rose felt about Cal, the man she had to spend the rest of her life with. She only cared about how how it would affect her. Nothing more.
You are lying by saying she had any reason to feel threatened by Jack when she first met him. She hated him only because of his class. There was no sign that either had feelings for the other at that point. All she knew was he was poor, and he saved Rose's life. The former mattered far more than the latter to her. Did she thank Jack for saving her daughter? No. She just went out of her way to demean him. And again, Cal wasn't threatened by Jack that whole dinner. It wasn't until Rose went to the party with Jack. If Ruth was rude to Jack after that party, I'd agree with you. But she was rude BEFORE. When she only knew he was poor.
LOL. You say you have more wisdom and I'm infantile, yet you're the one who felt a need to resort to personal attacks. I'm having a discussion about fictional characters. You for some reason are taking this so personally you resort to laughable insults. All over Ruth from Titanic. Go ahead and pretend you have more wisdom, little boy. When you learn to have a discussion about movies without needing to insult people, that claim might not be so laughable. Grow up son.
Rose sought him out at that first meeting, and he saved her life. She was thanking him. Only a cold hearted jerk would brush something like that off. And the fact that she cared more about his class than the fact that her daughter was only alive because of him is disgusting.
Hindsight is wonderful, isn't it? No, she had zero idea they'd connect the way they would. After she spent the night at the party with him, sure. But not before that. Even Cal wasn't threatened by Jack then.
Ruth had a problem only because he was third class. And that was more important to her than saving Rose from dying.
She had zero idea what would happen between Jack and Rose. All she knew at that point was he saved her life.
Please, she had zero idea that Jack would end up doing what he did with Rose. Yeah, he was spitting. You know what he did before that? Saved Rose's life. You keep ignoring that. She should have been on her knees thanking him. Instead she does her best to insult, degrade, and humiliate him. She knew Rose had a "skanky streak"? Where's the proof of that? Oh right, there is none. You literally just made that up.
You question my age for calling Ruth horrible, meanwhile you call Rose a skank and Jack scum? Are you trying to be a hypocrite? Or is it just something you can't help?
The fact you hate Jack but defend Ruth is very telling. Jack was definitely a pain, but when she first met him all she knew was he saved her daughter's life. That's it. Oh, and he was a third class passenger, because that's all that mattered to her. Rescue her daughter? Who cares, he was a third class waste of life to her.
You deliberately ignore how her first reaction to Jack wasn't to thank him for saving her daughters life and her own future, but to look at him like he was scum. Did you hear one word of gratitude or relief from her about Jack saving her only daughters life? I thought so. She then does her best to degrade and humiliate him at dinner. He saved Rose, yet she doesn't care, and only wants to mock and judge him.
She's a horrible, horrible, person. She's the definition of cruel.
I understand it, I'm not saying it was bad writing or anything. Just that she's truly awful, but I think a lot of people focus on Cal more than Ruth, understandably.