MovieChat Forums > Boromir > Replies
Boromir's Replies
It's okay Andy :)
Have A Nice Week.
The direction the discussion went in was really unnecessary. You can agree or not agree, or agree or disagree with some aspects of his post but it's definitely a legitimate post.
CaptBeefBlower even tell us "feel free to disagree, but please keep it civilised and constructive". And most people really responded in a respectful way, whether they agreed with him or not.
So let's summarize:
You are a chauvinist against men by silencing any position that references discrimination against them.
You are a chauvinist against women by challenging their identity the moment they disagree with you.
You are racist against whites by holding stereotypical views and harboring intense animosity toward them.
I wrote to him that I did not understand this sentence or care, then in other post he made it clear exactly what he thought. He knew I was being attacked here by some bullies and that's why he mentioned my country in the discussion to make a provocation. And that's exactly what I argued, that he uses nicknames and plays dirty in discussions.
<blockquote>YOU ALSO PROBABLY AREN'T FEMALE.</blockquote>
Typical Kowalski: "if females didn't agree with my radical views about gender they probably not a real biological females"
And what the hell she said that you attack her like that? she even mentioned "it's great to see more positive and multi faceted approaches to women and minority characters ".
You don't even apologized.
Again Kowalski chooses to swear instead of having a discussion.
So for Kowalski, if a female doesn't agree with him or behave the way he thinks all women should, she's probably not a woman. This chauvinistic behavior is evident in your treatment of AmeriGirl26, and even now you continue to bully her.
All I said is true.
He attacking me.
And I am not his friend.
Last 24 hours
I think I'll skip my turn.
Nice!!!
Classic movie.
BTW, I find The Next Karate Kid as good also although the low rating in IMDb.
The Karate Kid (1984)
Kindergarten Cop (1990)
You said nasty things in the first post!!
At first it was against the off-topic, then you delegitimization my argument - by defaming the country where I live (in complete ignorance). Why weren't you able to answer him in a nice way without attacking the personality you attribute to his views? This is called ad hominem.
Your whole discussion from the beginning was personal. Their is users who agree with you and give nice answer to the off-topic without attack him personality. Why can't you do the same?
Yes there is a problem, because you don't know nothing about that. Why did you even go that way?
I was rude after you attack me.
You really don't see the problem with what you said?