Had sex with Mick Jagger when she was 15 - Rae Dawn Chong Discussion

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (10953) 8 months ago

Mick Jagger sure got around. The guy should be castrated and hung upside down to bleed to death ... if hers and Mackenzie Phillips' allegations are true. They may very well not be.

reply

[–] Mustang (5274) 8 months ago

I saw an interview with Rae and she described herself as a real life Lolita. She knew what she was doing and wasn't making any accusations of coercion.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (10953) 8 months ago

If it was one girl I'm not some self-righteous moralist about it. But Jagger allegedly did the same thing to an underage Mackenzie Phillips. If it's a predatory pattern, then Jagger is a creep.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

Why the hell is she defending him?

reply

[–] Kendricks (2183) 8 months ago

Because it was consensual, she wanted it and she liked it?
It's really not rocket science.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

If she was 15 then it wasn't consensual. That's statutory rape.

reply

[–] Kendricks (2183) 8 months ago

According to the law? Sure.
Still, she seems to disagree.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

Just because she consented to it, that still doesn't make it okay. What if a few years after the incident she realized she made the wrong decision? The whole point of statutory rape laws is to prevent children from making wrong choices to avoid being groomed.

reply

[–] Kendricks (2183) 8 months ago

"What if a few years after the incident she realized she made the wrong decision?"
Regret is not the same as rape.
I know what you're getting at and sure it's complicated, or can be.
But in this case it's simply not. She's obviously perfectly fine with it and thus I do not see why it is an issue.

Good for her?
Rape is horrible and something society punishes severely for good reasons.
But it is also wrong to pretend that a 15 year old girl is brain dead and cannot make any sexual decisions.
At 15, girls are in the middle of puberty, further along than boys are usually and just because she's not an adult on paper doesn't mean she's unable to decide to have apparently good sex with someone. Would it have been so different if he would have done it with some clueless 15 year old boy over Jagger?
And she wasn't 9 or something, she was 15 - a young woman.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

Regret is not the same as rape.

Her being 15 and him being 33 makes it rape. If she decided to press charges against him, he'd be in prison.

At 15, girls are in the middle of puberty,

Why would a 33 year old have sex with a girl who hasn't went through puberty?

Would it have been so different if he would have done it with some clueless 15 year old boy over Jagger?

He shouldn't be doing it with any 15 year old. That's called grooming.

reply

[–] Kendricks (2183) 8 months ago

None of that really matters, there was no victim.

She wanted it.
She loved it.

reply

[–] Kowalski (63923) 8 months ago

YIKES.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

Of course it does. I can't believe I'm giving an example about Oprah, but Oprah was a victim of rape when she was a kid. I believe she was 14. She said at the time when you're young it feels good. Then when you get to a certain age, you realize how wrong that person was for doing it to you.

reply

[–] Kendricks (2183) 8 months ago

So whatever fucking Oprah says is right and whatever anyone else says is wrong?
Oprah has nothing to do with this.

How about we ask Rae?
Because we do not like the answer?
Again, there was no victim, she wanted it, she loved it, she STILL speaks highly of it after all these years. What more do you need to just accept it and move on?
What is the alternative? "metoo" outrage on her behalf?

Again, a 15 year old girl can make sexual decisions, you not liking them is not her problem.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

It's not about Rae. Mick Jagger wouldn't have known whether or not she would have regretted it when she got older. If anyone had come out with a similar story and said "even though I thought it was right at the time, I now realize how wrong it was", the man would be in jail. That's what child grooming is. They make the person underage believe that what they are doing is right.

reply

[–] They4cedTheVax (318) 8 months ago

Groom these fuckin nuts you faggot.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

Why? Is there a lot of pubes on them?

reply

[–] Kowalski (63923) 8 months ago

I USED TO THINK NOT PAYING FOR THINGS WAS AWESOME...ACCORDING TO THE LAW IT WAS NOT...THE LAW WAS RIGHT...I WAS A CHILD WITH A NOT COMPLETELY FORMED BRAIN.

reply

[–] liscarkat (17125) 8 months ago

When you were fifteen? When I was fifteen my brain was sufficiently formed to know stealing was not good, and to make the decision not to do it.

reply

[–] Kowalski (63923) 8 months ago

NOT THE POINT...THE POINT IS AT 15 YOU ARE NOT AN ADULT...YOU ARE NOT FULLY FORMED AND YOU ARE NOT OLD ENOUGH TO MAKE DECISIONS LIKE FUCKING MICK JAGGER'S CREEPY GROWN ASS.

reply

[–] DickusBiggus (209) 8 months ago

You think you can excuse yourself for stealing your moms dildo with that argument? this woman knew what she was doing like you knew what you were doing.

Stop acting retarded and stop stealing peoples shit specially your moms dildo you have already 54, grow up already

reply

[–] Kowalski (63923) 8 months ago

NOT A WOMAN...A 15 YEAR OLD GIRL...AND NO...I TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR STEALING MY MOM'S DILDO.

reply

[–] DickusBiggus (209) 8 months ago

You steal peoples shit and fuck midgets you are realy a piece of work buddy every thing that I learn about you is always some dark shit, you have a cosmic darkness around you the day you die the devil is going to have a feast with your soul, like a leprechaun eating unicorn testicles.

reply

[–] Kowalski (63923) 8 months ago

I NO LONGER STEAL ANYTHING IF THAT MATTERS...AND LITTLE PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE...AS LONG AS IT'S CONSENUAL,BRO.

reply

[–] agentalbert (2553) 8 months ago

We understand the law. But 15 year olds do have free will. Most people have sex before they are legally supposed to. To her credit she can look back and know she did what she wanted to, not make some big deal about an event from 40+ years ago. Good for her.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

You're looking at it from her perspective. There is no good reason why a 33 year old should be having sex with a 15-year-old girl even if she did consent.

reply

[–] agentalbert (2553) 8 months ago

What's wrong with looking at it from her perspective? She's a 58 year old woman, certainly old and wise enough to have a more valid perspective on it than anyone else. And she's okay.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

Because Mick is mostly the wrong one in this. I'm not going to fault Rae Dawn Chong for having sex with him because she was too young to make that decision, but I fault her for defending him. What Mick did was literal grooming.

reply

[–] agentalbert (2553) 8 months ago

Okay. But it was 40+ years ago, and everyone's okay. Making bad decisions is part of being young. And she's not even saying it was bad decision. It's her prerogative to frame her own life. But go on hand wringing over it.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

Again, my issue is mostly with Mick.

reply

[–] Popcorngal (4481) 8 months ago

Tell that to human beings. They will never listen. Look at school teachers today!

reply

[–] samoanjoes (53091) 8 months ago

Yeah. When I hear stories about teachers having relationship with kids, a lot of grown men will often respond with, "I wish my teacher would do that to me." They laugh until it happens to one of their own children.

reply

[–] Kendricks (2183) 8 months ago

InB4 "hurr durr muh rape!"
Edit: Lol, too late already!

reply

[–] Zinger (2219) 8 months ago

So everyone had a great time.

Lovely.

But what I really wanna know is did Arnold smash her. Must have.

reply

[–] R_Kane (15828) 8 months ago

“A nice body”!? I fucking love The Stones, but Mick has always had the body of a broomstick. She smoked too much of Daddy Chong’s weed; which was the only reason why audiences thought the 2 loser assholes were funny.

Robert Plant, Roger Daltry—animal bodies, but not muscle men. Mick Jagger—broom stick. Maybe it made his dick look bigger.

reply

[–] Kowalski (63923) 8 months ago

FAIR ENOUGH ON THE STONES...BUT YOU WENT TO FAR!...CHEECH & CHONG ARE LEGENDS...I TELL YOU!

reply

[–] ShadowHunter (814) 8 months ago

dont forget she said gorgerous. the man had the face of a large mouth bass

https://i0.wp.com/rollingstonesdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/mick-jagger-quote-1972.jpg?fit=656%2C400&ssl=1

https://www.bobgruen.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/R-33_MickJagger1972_Gruen.jpg

reply

[–] legnadibrom (5873) 8 months ago

yeah, that's the part i'm stuck on, she must've been drugged

reply

[–] jk90us (5843) 8 months ago

MacKenzie Phillips, who said he banged her at 18 (but wanted to since she was 10), said he had a fantastic ass. 🙄

reply

[–] mtxmind (3296) 8 months ago

Allegedly semi-propositioned her when she was 13, but said "Too bad" when she told him how old she was.

I won't bring up the story she told years ago that she was banging Papa John.....😱😱😱

reply

[–] Popcorngal (4481) 8 months ago

At least Mick is a little better than Bill Wyman,he dated a 13 year. old with her mother's permission. Then again, his son was dating the mom too. Messed up family. At least Mick waited till she was a legal 18 year old. Rae is right,there are a lot of willing 15 year girls out there waiting to sleep with older men, nothing new there!

reply

[–] jk90us (5843) 8 months ago

I will.

https://moviechat.org/nm0680603/Mackenzie-Phillips/654e9a7a4fceff22dfd2d925/Had-sex-with-her-dad

You’re welcome.

reply

[–] mtxmind (3296) 8 months ago

She made room for Daddy!!😱😱😱

reply

[–] agentalbert (2553) 8 months ago

You as a guy, and probably straight, might not be the best barometer of Mick Jagger's sex appeal to women.

reply

[–] Keelai (32736) 8 months ago

It was still statutory rape since a 15-year-old isn't considered to have the maturity to consent in the U.S..

reply

[–] jk90us (5843) 8 months ago

According to old white guys who set that law.

reply

[–] BlackMass (721) 8 months ago

On what planet was Jagger "gorgeous"? The guy was a bizarre genetic failure who landed women because he had money and fame.

Damn, the Stones really did well out of being the Beatles' "rivals". They were the shits and would have been swiftly forgotten otherwise.

reply