the situation is so unreal he must be getting briefcases full of cash from the dad, win-win situation for both of them.
shareYes, every judge who has ever heard her case, social worker, lawyer, doctor, and other decision maker involved has all been paid off.They are all in on it and want to keep Britney down. It's not possible she's actually mentally ill, it's all fixed. It's everyone else, not her.
share
Heheh.. yep..
I read she refused to take the are-you-sane? test , so ...
shareNot only is she clearly troubled, she's not smart either. If her dad is abusing her, as she claims, her concentration should be on having someone else be named her caretaker (or whatever). She should be fighting to have someone else put in charge of her affairs. But she's not smart enough to think like that.
shareyeah , that'd be good idea
shareApparently, she hasn't even filed to have it changed. This article implies it's her attorney's fault: https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/29/entertainment/britney-spears-begging-attorney-end-conservatorship/index.html. Maybe the guy is inept? But I also just read he is court appointed. She didn't hire someone to handle this?! You'd think someone fighting for their freedom - especially someone with money - would take this a little more seriously. She's just not smart.
shareAs far as I know, this is what she asked, and this is what has been refused.
shareShe and her attorney haven't even filed to change the conservator: https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/29/entertainment/britney-spears-begging-attorney-end-conservatorship/index.html.
"In the week since Britney Spears' bombshell court hearing in which she asked to terminate her nearly 13-year court-ordered conservatorship, CNN has learned from a source close to the singer's family that she has "begged" her attorney, Samuel Ingham, III to file a petition to end the arrangement once and for all.
"Britney has spoken to Sam multiple times since last week and she has asked him point-blank, once again, to file the paperwork to end this," this source told CNN.
A second source close to Spears confirmed that the singer, who has been vacationing in Hawaii, had spoken to Ingham and urged him to move forward with the necessary legal efforts.
Ingham has yet to file the petition, but two sources with knowledge of the situation say that a filing could be imminent. "
CNN is fake news media. The article you linked is, indeed, a good example of fake news.
Let's analyze it.
The main message in the article is that Spears asked her attorney to end the conservatorship. The problem is that the "source" for that is 'a source close to the singer's family', which means... the parents. There's a trial, and this "newspaper" is using one side as a "source" about what the opposed side allegedly spoke in private. What could go wrong?
That doesn't look like good journalism, does it?
Well, a source close to Spears confirmed it, isn't it?. And here comes the example of how to write fake news. Let's check the sentence: "A second source close to Spears confirmed that the singer, who has been vacationing in Hawaii, had spoken to Ingham and urged him to move forward with the necessary legal efforts.".
The structure of the sentence is well thought fake news. It's written using the following format "a source close to Spears confirmed - [interlude with some irrelevant information] - [some more info about what that source said]". The interlude "who has been vacationing in Hawaii" doesn't add relevant info, ant that settles the previous info: "a source close to Spears confirmed". That's the idea the writer wants to convey, that the source close to Spears confirmed.
But what the source close to Spears really confirmed?. Literally: (1) "[Spears] had spoken to Ingham". And (2) "[Spears] urged him to move forward with the necessary legal efforts" (it doesn't specify in what direction). So it's confirmed that Spears has spoken with her lawyer during a trial, who would have imagined, and that Spears wants his lawyer to make all the necessary legal efforts during the trial. Again, who would have imagined?.
What we have is the CNN doing a skilled exercise of fake news. It has used some empty formulaic sentences from the source close to Spears ("they have spoken, the attorney is doing all the necessary legal efforts, blah blah formulaic blah") to write a piece that, if you don't pay enough attention, seems to confirm the message the other side wants to convey.
"CNN is fake news media. The article you linked is, indeed, a good example of fake news.
Let's analyze it."
This is what's called baseless opinion. You are not someone who operates in logic or reality.
This time, the biggest reason the conservatorship was continued, was because Brit refused to take a psych evaluation. No judge is going to make a huge change in a high profile change without as much evidence as possible!
And again, the judge has access to Britney's medical records and evals from the doctors and nurses who are around her all the time, and the Free Britney crowd does not. The Free Britney crowd is making huge assumptions about her mental state on the basis of minimal evidence, like the statement to the judge, they have no idea how stable or unstable or dangerous or disabled Spears really is in private.
I have heard from several places that she refused, but haven't seen it for myself. Where did you read it?
shareEverwhere, really, and I believe she said so herself in her rant to the judge. She said she's been evaluated before, and she's sick of it.
Feel free to look at the news yourself, I haven't had my coffee yet.
It does seem so surreal. Why would a 40 year old be locked into a conservatorship? The only answer I can think of is that she's borderline insane. I mean, how many people can be in on this?
Prove it
shareDon't believe everything on television or the internet, especially if it has a hashtag associated. Most of what you see is marketing.
share