MovieChat Forums > Kaley Cuoco Discussion > I award her with the Most Overated Actor...

I award her with the Most Overated Actor in Hollywood!


So she was a small time player on Charmed, then on a show that someone who passed away was the star of, and no one seemed to remember she was in it but they tried to milk it as long as they could after his passing, and then she lands this role on Big Bang and suddenly she's worth nearly 30 million a year?

Her acting is not that great, and don't defend it because shes a nerds fantasy now... how is she worth 30 million a year? and more importantly, how the hell is she worthy of a star on the walk of fame????? Isn't that supposed to be like a lifetime achievement honor sort of thing? And she gets one just for being on this show?

She goes on talk shows and says she cant beleive people like what she tweets shes having for lunch...... W T F??????

OVERRATED and you can't deny it.

reply

Not one of you here has contributed a decent answer. She is overrated, and not worth 30 million or a career worthy of a star. All you people have written is you're fan boys without putting any thought into what you're saying other than confessing your love for her and nothing has changed my opinion about her.

I suppose you all follow her Twitter and act like you care what she tweets she had for lunch? She was the worst guest on that show ever.

reply

I agree she should't have a star on the Walk of Fame, at least not yet. She is "hot" girl in an ensemble cast. A comparable character would be Rachel from "Friends". Jennifer Anniston didn't get her star until 2012, long after Friends had ended and she had also done a few successful movies. What if Kaley does nothing after BBT? Then, people will be talking about why she has a star at all.

As far as her salary, according to Adam Smith, something is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. If they are willing to pay her 30 million, then she is worth 30 million.

reply