MovieChat Forums > Bob Saget Discussion > Strange reporting on this....

Strange reporting on this....

posted 2 years ago by [deleted]
10 replies | jump to latest

Of course, I have absolutely no first-hand knowledge about Saget's death, but there is a strange thing about how this has been reported.

With the description released, this type of death is not only plausible but not even uncommon or unusual. However, the bizarre thing is how it has been reported. He passed away on Jan 9 and this type of injury that results in a death is most typically known during autopsy but in this case, it is just now being reported as a death due to head trauma.

And there may have been some sort of reason not to release the cause of death (family sensitivity, to finish the entire investigation, and so on).

Sadly, it is this type of discrepancy that does feed conspiracy theories, but it is still very unusual not to disclose the cause of death when it should have been known.

[–] cyguration (3945) 2 years ago

There is no conspiracy theory. Shortly before his head trauma incident he was talking about having gotten his booster shot:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SrvLg5o3Lc&t=5s

A lot of people are suffering from neuro-inflammatory disorders, resulting in swelling in the brain and blackouts:
https://swprs.org/covid-vaccine-adverse-events/

This can be caused due to bleeding or clotting occurring in the carotid or vertebral arteries.

Comedian Heather McDonald was on-stage bragging about being triple-jabbed when she suffered from a blackout due to swelling in her brain, fracturing her skull due to head trauma:
https://youtu.be/KoRKTr8-Nns

She was rushed to the hospital. Saget went to bed.

[–] sslssg (30416) 2 years ago

Where did you see that it was because of swelling in her brain?

https://www.tmz.com/2022/02/08/heather-mcdonald-fainting-collapsing-on-stage-video/

"Heather says she's still not sure why it happened ... though she says she didn't eat before her weekend set and only drank half a Red Bull and some water.

Heather says she got a cat scan and a battery of other tests, all of which she says came back totally normal."

What do you know that she doesn't?

Also with the Vaers, they list everything, whether it's actually related to the vaccine or not because they aren't sure. There are over 23 million miscarriages every single year world wide. Just because someone has had a vaccine and they miscarry, it doesn't mean that it was because of the vaccine. Just like getting the vaccine and having a car accident. Causation, correlation, or coincidence? It could be any of them.

[–] cyguration (3945) 2 years ago

Heather says she got a cat scan and a battery of other tests, all of which she says came back totally normal."

CAT scans =/= blood tests.

Those are two completely different things.

What do you know that she doesn't?

Unless she's a doctor or shares the actual medical results from her health practitioner, a heck of a lot more than she does.

Radiology results can outline topography for build-up and coagulation, but typically as it's happening. What they won't show is if there was swelling that has already passed. It's like police arriving at the scene of a minor crash after both vehicles have driven away.

The skull fracture may have even saved her life if it allowed the release of cerebral pressure:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6707499/

Jimmy Dore encountered a very similar problem, but before it caused an aneurysm the doctors found it and proceeded to reduce the inflammation on his brain. This occurred shortly after he had his COVID shot as well.

Also with the Vaers, they list everything, whether it's actually related to the vaccine or not because they aren't sure.

VAERS is actually highly under-reported by a factor of 10. And what's more, some medical practitioners are purposely NOT reporting SAEs on discharge sheets. Approximately 22% of patients haven't properly received identification from their physician as having an SAE related to a vaccination shot, despite that being the case. And 64% of cases involving SAEs chiefly related to myopericarditis are not being classified by the CDC's VSD until specific claims associated with the SAE are separately submitted:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.21.21268209v1

In short, not only is VAERS under-reporting by a factor of 10, but a sizable percentage of people are being purposely misled by their own physicians regarding vaccine-related SAEs, and the CDC's own VSD is not cataloging these events as apropos.

[–] sslssg (30416) 2 years ago

Well, the battery of other tests came back normal with Heather, we don't know what tests those were.

The vaccine very well may have done it. It also might not have. You want the vaccine to have done it to fit your agenda, so you are making what you want fit. I'm not going to debate it with you because of that. I've been down this road with you before.

[–] cyguration (3945) 2 years ago

Just because someone has had a vaccine and they miscarry, it doesn't mean that it was because of the vaccine.

That's true, but when Pfizer saw spontaneous abortions take place within the placebo group of women who took and DID NOT take the vaccine, then red flags should be raised:
https://i.imgur.com/syZFHFm.jpg

Pfizer also noted shedding effects (I can explain further if you want) and additional spontaneous abortion results from preliminary tests, and advised administrators about the occurrence during guidance. You'll find it on page 68:
https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

For those curious what Pfizer stated, it reads... "Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention."

This is exactly what happened months later following pregnant women being vaccinated:
https://archive.is/preL7

You're right that in some cases causation, correlation, or coincidence could be at play, but when Pfizer had months of testing showing results of spontaneous abortions from shedding/vaccination, and dedicated an entire section to it in their testing guidance, and then we see it happen as they described in real-world application, I'm resigned to follow the actual testing methodology results.

First time's a coincidence, second time it's deliberate, third time it's a pattern.

[–] sslssg (30416) 2 years ago

Again with the miscarriages, there is no way of knowing if these women would have miscarried anyways. Miscarriages account for up to 1/5 of all pregnancies. 44 per minute worldwide. So if in The Epoch Times article there were 35 reported, I also want to know how many pregnant women got that vaccine who didn't miscarry. If it was 35 out of 35 million that's nothing, if it was 35 out of 100 then it's a problem.

[–] cyguration (3945) 2 years ago

Again with the miscarriages, there is no way of knowing if these women would have miscarried anyways. Miscarriages account for up to 1/5 of all pregnancies. 44 per minute worldwide.

That's fine and dandy, but we're not talking about global miscarriages, we're talking about the fact that Pfizer has a reported and repeated issue with spontaneous abortions with women who partook in their tests, both in the placebo and control group studies, and dedicated several pages to the issues of spontaneous abortions/shedding effects, which also caused heavier than normal menstruation for women (which is still occurring to this very day):
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34991109/

I only linked the Epoch Times article to show a consistency of cause/effect and correlation to Pfizer's own studies; Pfizer was the one who noted it to be an issue in multiple test phases, but then publicly claimed it was safe for pregnant women.

And besides that, it doesn't in the least bit bother or worry you that spontaneous abortions were a repeatedly common occurrence during pre-clinical and early phase trial tests that Pfizer conducted themselves and noted to be a significant problem in their own administrative guidance?

[–] sslssg (30416) 2 years ago

My point was they didn't list how many pregnant women got the vaccine vs how many had miscarriages.

[–] Jinx (3159) 2 years ago

This guy is nuts.

[–] GuyHaines (240) 2 years ago

“There is no conspiracy theory”

Proceeds to waste his time writing an essay-length conspiracy theory.