[deleted]
[deleted]
You're funny!
Pathetic, too, but still funny.
What really stands out is how desperate he is to draw the false equivalence. 😰
shareYeah, that and the fact that he's so upset about this supposed Chinese meddling...but no outrage at all about the PROVEN Russian meddling, or that his assclown leader still refuses to even admit it happened.
shareThere is absolutely no proof that the Russian government meddled in the election. None. Zero.
shareMaybe if you got your news from somewhere else besides your propaganda network you'd be better informed.
https://www.wired.com/story/did-russia-affect-the-2016-election-its-now-undeniable/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43092085
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/16/robert-mueller-russians-charged-election
https://www.nytimes.com/news-event/russian-election-hacking
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/information-warfare-how-russians-interfered-2016-election-n848746
No proof. Sorry to burst your bubble.
shareI wish you'd visit me the next time I eat walnuts...I could use your head to crack them open.
shareThere is obviously proof because of all of the charges against President Trump....oh...wait... nevermind.
shareDo you mean the same Trump who is afraid to be questioned by Mueller or release his tax returns or have his business financial records examined? I smell guilt.
People who plead guilty or indicted under Mueller's Russia Investigation so far:
*George Papadopoulos - plead guilty (Trump national security adviser) lying
*Paul Manafort- indicted - (Trump’s campaign chair) conspiracy, money laundering, lying, tax, financial, and bank fraud charges
*Rick Gates - pleas deal in works (Trump campaign aide) same charges as Manfort
*13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies - indicted conspiracy and identity thesft related to Russian propaganda effort designed to interfere with the 2016 campaign.
*Richard Pinedo - plead guilty to identity theft charge related to Russian nationals.
*Alex van der Zwaan plead guilty to lying
Konstantin Kilimnik - charged- attempt to obstruct justice by tampering with witnesses in Manafort’s pending case this year.
That's a long list considering the very short amount of time for the investigation. Realistically, Cohen, Flynn and others are going to squeal on Trump. It's hard to deny a paper trail.
Thos are claims! You know what a PROOF is? And BTW The FBI already stated ater the election that there was no russian involvement. So stop telling SJW lies here, loser!
shareNo they didn't.
shareThey did. A few months after the election of Trump!
shareCite it or it didn't happen.
The only published article that even remotely resembles what you're claiming is a notoriously misleading NY Times article published on October 31st, a week and a half before the election, that said there was "no clear link" between the Russians and the Trump campaign.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html
In fact this article was so misleading that Christopher Steele, the British MI6 agent and former head of their Russian division who had been feeding the intel he was actively discovering on Russian links to the Trump campaign to the FBI was so alarmed when he read that article that it's what motivated him to go to the press instead with his findings. According to congressional testimony from Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who had hired him to compile the dossier, after reading that article Steele assumed there must have been an active coverup going on in the bureau.
NY Times has since published a mea culpa describing what the FBI did in fact know at that time.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/16/us/politics/crossfire-hurricane-trump-russia-fbi-mueller-investigation.html
So the question you should really be asking yourself is, do YOU know what proof is?
"Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia"
NY TImes 10 31st 2016
Case closed.
lolz! Like most Trump supporters, you apparently don't read. If you had read my last post you would have seen I'm running circles around you. Not only did I cite the article you referenced (which was, like I said, a week and a half before the election not months after as you had claimed) I also cited the retraction and included the link.
You should learn to read.
Why are you quoting a NY Times article from 2016?
And what about the fact that Trump now (once again) says Russia did meddle?
There's lots of proof, you'd only need to read the news. What MSM and the left get wrong constantly is pointing it directly towards Trump which is false and why the right defend him so. It's the Trump administration or those closest to him that did the meddling. Trump is just smart enough not to get himself directly involved and had his family members do the bidding/work around the scenes if you will.
The funny part will be if Trump himself never gets impeached or indicted just like Hillary Clinton. Hillary has had many scandals but no evidence to convict while Trump also has had many scandals but just had to pay the fines but nothing yet on his main scandal. Support for Trump is even growing now as the years go by. People are getting used to the Trump rhetoric or just having him around after the crazy stuff has been accepted as the norm.
He doesn't read the news.
shareExcept, among others:
The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley
The U.S. House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, dominated by Republicans sympathetic to Trump
And that’s only since April. That’s not counting the indictments on Russians that Mueller made or the reports by intelligence agencies that said this in 2017.
If you’d said there was no proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians it would still be dubious but at least not nonsensical. But this claim is nothing but breitbart/Alex Jones/Tomi Lahren tinfoil hat wearing.
At this point I am sincerely suspicious that YOU’RE a Russian bot/spin doctor. Because no American can be so dedicated to ignoring simple facts put out there in part by the party they say they support. The only other explanation is that you don’t support the GOP and only support Trump (the erstwhile Democrat).
This coming from a guy who openly admits to being an admirer of the Chinese government. Despicable.
shareShow me where I openly said anything of the sort. Anything that shows I support China.
I DARE you.
All you’ll find is a post in reply to you throwing a typical hissy about China retaliating to Trumps tariffs. And even there I don’t mention China being right. I point out that you’re (as usual) wrong because you get all upset over the retaliation but not the act they are retaliating to. Because all you do is regurgitate what Alex Jones and breitbart tell you.
But please, show the post or posts where i’m Supporting China.
Otherwise, sit down, shut up and let the grown ups talk.
Oh, and nice try at deflection instead of actually addressing the point. But as usual, you’re woefully ill-equipped to do it as well as Donny...and HE’S a thin skinned buffoon!
STILL waiting.....
shareYeah he is the king of straw manning like that. It's really the only way he really knows how to form an argument.
shareSTILL waiting.....
shareThink he's on a long-term vacation (wink, wink)....
shareTo Russia?
shareHopefully.
shareHe's back. Only now he's calling himself "Quint."
shareYup. I suspected he was one of the new stragglers that peddled verbatim 3to10's ignorance. You nailed it.
shareWhat? Was he banned and re-registered under a new name?
shareI think he just got tired of the clowning he got from his chosen moniker that 3to10 is the measure of his IQ.
shareSoi he chose to change to the name of a guy too stupid to put on a life jacket?
shareIf 310 and Quint are the same person then he was using both IDs at the same time. I had an exchange with Quint on the Halloween (2018) board a month ago.
Makes me wonder if any banning has taken place since Culburn disappeared a month ago.
Exactly. There is no equivalence because there was no Trump/Russian collusion. Over 100 weeks since we know the illegal Obama wire taps of Trump started. The mueller team of 16 demokkkrat doners over 60 weeks, and still ZERO evidence of collusion.
Meanwhile the demokkkrat media praying and cheering for an economic slowdown. Their wet dream was 2% growth under Obama’s “1% the new norm”.
Meanwhile we’re at 4% growth under Trump with record stock markets, unemployment, and drops in illegal immigratoon.
The demokkkrat platform, pray and act behind the scenes to sabotage the country so they can blame Trump.
This is the demokkkrat party of no ideas or solutions. The party of obsessive hate. The party of brainless lemmings.
#NovemberIsComing
#StillNoPlatform
#HateIsNotAPlatform
#walkaway
You are not qualified to claim there was no "Trump/Russian" collusion--just because that assclown claims there wasn't doesn't make it so. Until Robert Mueller weighs in with the results of his investigation, NO-ONE (except President AssClown himself) knows whether there was or wasn't any collusion. What IS definite is that there's enough circumstantial evidence indicating there was to warrant an investigation.
Are you at least man enough--a SANE man enough, that is--to agree with the findings of ALL the United States Intelligence Agencies that the Russians meddled with and influenced the results of the 2016 election?
Once again, your post can't be taken seriously since all it involves is fantasy wish projection.
shareYou seemed to overlooked answering my simple, direct question to you, so I'll repeat it here:
Are you at least man enough--a SANE man enough, that is--to agree with the findings of ALL the United States Intelligence Agencies that the Russians meddled with and influenced the results of the 2016 election?
The US government operates 16 intelligence agencies. Since you referred to the findings of all US intelligence agencies, could you provide links to the 16 reports containing those findings?
shareFake logic! The premise is false. Stop watching CNN.
shareLibtards prove once more they have no sense of humor! 3:10 is hilarious, mocking Dimocrat's conspiracy theory.
share