MovieChat Forums > Hunter Biden Discussion > The New York Times Belatedly Admits the ...

The New York Times Belatedly Admits the Emails on Hunter Biden's Abandoned Laptop Are Real and Newsworthy!


https://reason.com/2022/03/17/the-new-york-times-belatedly-admits-the-emails-on-hunter-bidens-abandoned-laptop-are-real-and-newsworthy/
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/16/us/politics/hunter-biden-tax-bill-investigation.html

Yesterday The New York Times published a story that quotes emails from a laptop that Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden's son, abandoned at a computer repair shop in Delaware. The messages reinforce the impression that Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company that reportedly paid the younger Biden $50,000 a month to serve on its board, expected him to use his influence with his father for the company's benefit—an allegation that figured prominently in the scandal that led to Donald Trump's impeachment for pressuring the Ukrainian government to announce a Biden-Burisma corruption investigation. The messages include evidence that Hunter Biden arranged an April 2015 meeting between his father, then the vice president, and a Burisma executive.

reply

I am shocked. I was told by everyone around me, including my college professor that this was all fake Russian disinformation

reply

well we know thats fake conservatives don't get educations. they sit at home watching prayer and ben Shapiro videos and claims thats "a true educatioN"

reply

I was mislead here. The NYT admits now its real. I didn't realize that the Biden family was this corrupt

reply

The whole nation was mislead. Trump would have won reelection if this story got the coverage it deserved at the time. Polls said eight percent of Biden voters would have voted for Trump if they had known about this story before the election. The suppression tactics of Twitter and Facebook, and the deliberate smothering of this story by most of the mainstream media, changed the course of history.

reply

nooo trump would have won if he didnt bumble his handling of covid

reply

Oh, please, what else could he have done?

reply

not spread misinformation, encouraged masks, not downplayed it and said it'll be gone by spring. but policy and the scientific evidence ahead of his politics.

reply

You're a liar and an idiot. Move to Venezuela.

reply

Leodicaprio is a deluded cultist, he will never go against the Demokkkrat cult, he’s brainwashed and indoctrinated and it’s really disturbing that individuals such as him are allowed to vote.

reply

Trump did win. Those swing states are all coming around and acknowledging widespread fraud.

Most recently, WI

https://dcweekly.org/2022/03/16/just-in-rino-speaker-robin-vos-admits-widespread-fraud-occurred-in-wisconsin-but-says-legislature-cannot-decertify-video/

Georgia

https://www.worldtribune.com/report-video-shows-traffickers-dumping-thousands-of-ballots-in-georgia-drop-boxes-in-middle-of-the-night/



AZ

The canvassing project (this is why Biden's stooge AG threatened to go after canvassers - it would uncover perhaps the major tool for cheating). Basically, they "lose" mail-in votes from red counties, and cast mail-in votes for others who never actually voted.

https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/maricopa-county-canvassing-result/

The Audit

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21069027-cyber-ninjas-marico-audit-report-final-vol-3

This report details multiple problems with the election above and beyond what was found in the canvassing project. It does not include the ballot paper analysis (which supposedly indicates even more fraud) which is still supposedly being investigated by the AZ AG.




Here is more evidence of anomalies across the country

https://hereistheevidence.com/

reply

LLOLLLLLL

in WI

"Now, almost two weeks after Justice Gableman and Erick Kaardal testified in front of the WI Election Assembly, Republican (RINO) Speaker Robin Vos admits that widespread voter fraud took place in Wisconsin. Vos made the statement to the press after attending a closed-door meeting with a group of concerned WI residents advocating for decertification of the November election, including a GOP candidate for governor and State Rep. Timothy Ramthun (R) this afternoon."

WOW!!! more assertions from republicans. and ZERO evidence!!! here I can do it too! "Bigfoot exists!! its true!"

Georgia, no evidence, more assertions.

as for Maricopa County

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2021/09/09/canvass-report-arizonas-election-out-and-is-indeed-shocking/8258447002/


wow im not going forward reading more of our brain melting nonsense. its just articles of people making assertions, and presenting her evidence.

reply

These are evidence based reports, not assertions. Meanwhile, you are throwing propaganda at me and trying to pass it off as fact.

reply

No they arent

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2021/09/09/canvass-report-arizonas-election-out-and-is-indeed-shocking/8258447002/

read this that covers particularly your post about the "canvas report">

its completely made up assertions making claims she couldn't possibly support.


AHA! Votes cast from 'vacant' lots ... or not

The original cover pictured a vacant lot in Goodyear with a caption that said it “cast two mail-in votes.”
But an aerial map of the property, available online at the Maricopa County Assessor’s website, shows a house with a pool on the 4.3-acre property. Looks like a pretty nice house, too. According to realtor.com, it has five bedrooms, 3.5 bathrooms and upgraded maple cabinets in the kitchen. It was last sold in 2010.

It also has two registered voters, according to county records.

When ABC 15 reporter and former elections official Garrett Archer pointed this out, the cover of the canvass report was quickly changed to a vacant lot in Tempe “that cast a mail-in vote”.
but that property was a mobile home park in December 2019 and a person was properly registered to vote at that address. The voter requested that his ballot be sent to a temporary address within the county, which can be done legally for a year, according to Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer and Assessor Eddie Cook.Those are the only two actual examples of “fraud” offered in the report.



and on canvassing

They canvassed how many voters?

So, no evidence but plenty of blockbuster conclusions in the report, based upon information Harris claims was gathered on 4,570 voters.

Harris’ Conclusion No. 1: 173,104 people voted but their votes were never counted.

How does she know that? Harris reports that her canvassers talked to 964 people who were registered to vote but did not cast ballots in the 2020 election. Of those, 330 of them, or 34%, claimed they actually did vote but there is no record of their votes being counted.

Therefore, with a little extrapolation to all voters who didn’t vote last year, abracadabera, ipso facto and aHA, Harris concludes that 173,104 votes were not counted.

All this based on 330 people who claimed that they voted when someone showed up at their front door.


again totally Bullshit made-up assertions making claims with ZERO evidence about things she possibly couldn't know

reply

this is your brain on partisan conservatism. you are denying reality in favour of conspiracies that support you

reply

I'm not a conservative. I am anti-authoritarian

reply

lol so fringe libertarian. nice dodge though after I exposed your ridiculous post

reply

Only the dumbest of the dumb would still support the democrat party. They clearly don't have our interests at heart.

reply

not a dem supporter! again nice dodging the topic after I disproved your conspiracy nonsense!

reply

It is the only group I don't see you bash, so through process of elimination. I don't blame you. If I supported them, I wouldn't publicly admit it either.

reply

nice dodge again! cant address that BS nonsense I showed was made-up conspiracies I see. awwww sad loser cant man up and admit he fell for made-up shit

reply

You haven't presented credible evidence of anything. I am the one that provided results of extensive auditing and analysis and you responded with obvious propaganda

reply

hahahahahah get checked retard. gullible clown. earths flat too right?

reply

A little something about me - I have a PhD from a tier I research university and I work as a professional researcher. I eat, sleep, and breathe data. How I can tell if some talking head is telling the truth or not is because I am neck deep in the data/research they are talking about. To know the truth, you need to be able to do that as well. If you don't have some True North to compare with what those talking heads are saying, you will always be lost, because they aren't trying to tell you the truth. They are trying to tell you what to think.

Take my advice to heart, and perhaps I will see you in another thread.

reply

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/nov/05/fact-check-ben-carson-claim-pyramids-store-grain

and Ben Carson, One of the worlds top neurosurgeons said the pyramids were built to store grain.

you dont eat, sleep and breathe data if you read that article that clearly showed there is no way that lady had anyway of coming to those numbers! she just invented them out of thin air.

yet for political reasons clowns like you all the time will lie to themselves to make themselves feel good.

the link I sent wasnt a talking head, it was somone who tore apart your articles assertions for making claims THEY COULDN'T POSSIBLY KNOW

so again. you are a partisan hack. you fell for a hoax. you cant let it go because you are that duped, or either you would have to admit you fell for it.

you are an idiot

reply

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2021/09/09/canvass-report-arizonas-election-out-and-is-indeed-shocking/8258447002/

“I asked for sample concerns from Liz Harris on March 18 to forestall against such misinformation and clear up any questions,” he told me. “I never got any data. Assessor Eddie Cook later made the same request from Harris. It is irresponsible and silly to claim 200,000+ errors and offer only two alleged inaccuracies as hard data points, both of which are easily debunked. 0 for 2 is not a great start.”


NEVER GOT ANY DATA

NEVER GOT ANY DATA

NEVER GOT ANY DATA

SHE MADE IT UP. and you have the fucking nerve to claim you eat, sleep and breathe data. you are a clown and dull wit

reply

Wow that DC Weekly article really hits the nail on the head: they know and acknowledge widespread fraud took place but won't do anything about it?!

America truly is lost.

reply

There is legislation moving forward all over the country. Also, Republicans are finally being more vigilant. Last fall, when Republicans swept supposedly deep blue Virginia and put Glenn Youngkin in the Governor's mansion, the Republicans had observers and election lawyers everywhere. Didn't give them a chance to cheat. Had we done the same in New Jersey, we might have taken the governor's mansion there as well. But we didn't and the Dems "found" enough ballots for Phil Murphy in the days after the election to tip it for him.

reply

There is legislation moving forward all over the country.


I mean, they've been floating legislation since 2020, but the problem isn't legislation, it's enforcing already existing laws.

Audits should have taken place in November, right after claims of malfeasance were made. Instead, Dems waylaid the discussions of audits for months, and then further waylaid the process of actually having the audits take place.

Too many soft-toed Republicans just let them bend and outright break the law way too often. I don't even know exactly how legislation can stop them from magically "finding" ballots in the middle of the night unless they explicitly start enforcing already present ballot-counting cutoffs. I guess it's just frustrating because it was pretty obvious how the election was stolen, but all the bureaucratic gish galloping being allowed to stave off proper audits, investigations, and legal recourse is just infuriating.

We'll see if any of the new election bills that get passed are actually enforced this time around.

reply

Maybe. But the only reason why Trump won in 2016 was because of Putin

reply

LOL. No. Trump won in 2016 because Hillary Clinton took Wisconsin for granted.

reply

Well CNN said otherwise

reply

CNN lied to you. Putin didn't sway an election by spending $150,000 on Facebook ads. Don't be an idiot.

reply

They couldn't confirm the story. That's what I'm told. Can't report an uncomfirmed story!

reply

she too the entire electoral college for granted. she thought she had a sure win, and encouraged her CNN friends to cover him to ensure he won cause he'd be an "easy opponent"

reply

I think you've found a plot hole.

reply

I think you are right. The NYT gets a plot hole for their coverage of this story right before the election. I think this is the 1st time I'm giving a newspaper a plot hole

reply

Happy to have the assist on this one.

reply

Send this link to your ex-prof and ask "Do you still have so much faith in media and the intelligence community?"

reply

Generally we all can trust the mainstream media. This was just one time they let us down

reply

Yeah, like they were right about the Steele Dossier. Pay attention, all they do is push the establishment narrative. The truth means nothing to them.

reply

"all they do is push the establishment narrative. The truth means nothing to them."

from the guy who sent me one of the most embarrassing links to support his narrative I have ever seen

reply

I sent you a report on a well conducted audit and canvas. You can stick your head in the sand if you want to. The truth is, democrats have been relying on cheating to win for decades, but we are going to start making it a lot harder for them.

reply

"I sent you a report on a well conducted audit and canvas."

wow man put down the crackpipe. you didnt even read the article that demolished your nonsense conspiracy article

you dont want facts. you want to live in your la la land. get help. your re going to do shit because this is a fabrication in your mind you unhinged loon.

reply

I am literally shaking rn.

reply

I thought the intelligence experts that work for the news networks determined it had to be Russian propaganda. That's why the story was shut down. It had all the earmarks.

Earmarks!

reply

Waiting for LeodiCraprio to defend this disgusting piece of shit.

reply

I needed a second place! thanks for the free rent in your head!

reply

If I knew it was legit the whole time, then they had to know. They wrote is off as russian disinfo because they are not a legitimate news outlet, but a propaganda outlet for the Washington establishment and they were trying to stop the populist from winning re-election.

reply

Anyone who saw the photos and videos knew it was legit, but no one was allowed to post the evidence lest they get banned from social media and have the FBI pay them a visit.

It's beyond absurd.

reply

But the bribes and extortion and meetings with world leaders had nothing to do with the big guy.

reply

They wanted Trump out so badly that gross dereliction of duty when it came to investigating Biden was deemed acceptable. Our "watchdog press" is an utter disgrace. They gave us literally years of fake stories about Trump, and then buried the true story about Biden. Atrocious.

reply

President Trump was right again..

reply

Just another examples of how 95% of the media lies. Maybe liberals should start watching FOX instead of insane dumbbells.

reply

Thought you’d appreciate this montage featuring the conga line of legacy media stooges who were most pompous is dismissing the story in the run up to the election in order to protect Joe Biden

https://youtu.be/8qQazyJ99OE

reply