https://twitter.com/Samanon6/status/1460920497605160964
I want to see the fat lawyer go through this.
Why should he think he should be allowed to go where ever he wants. Clearly him having a gun with him showed he knew he wasn't wanted there and should have stayed away.Coming into a no go zone breaks the treaty set up for its existance.
shareDude was rushing at individuals with a sword. Chased protestors with machete before getting beat up.
The man later blamed himself for his own 'stupidity'.
Democrats set up the no go zone treaties for a reason. You can't go on private property either.
shareYou can't logically argue that's self-defense. There's 15 people stomping on an unarmed guy until he was folded in half. There's no defending that while feigning outrage over Rittenhouse, who was hit with a skateboard and assaulted by a gun with a gun.
shareYou missed the point, genius.
shareAny context to this?
shareI didn't really care for the story. I just wanted to point out what happens when a mob attacks one individual. The outcome is pretty brutal. The guy got folded in half.
shareWell, no. If Rittenhouse was unarmed, then it is likely no one would ever know his name. Rittenhouse was the only person shooting/wounding/killing people that night
shareYep! But you forgot the most important factor. He was “shooting/wounding/killing” in SELF DEFENSE!
BTW, there were other gun shots in that damn bunch of rioters! Most are relieved Kyle did what law and order failed to do…he took out a damn lunatic pedophile!
Self defense or not, he was the only one shooting people.
Lunatic pedophiles are normally not handed a death sentence just for being pedophiles.
Lunatic pedophiles are normally not handed a death sentence just for being pedophiles.
People keep on trying to justify Rittenhouse's shooting by saying he shot bad men. It is either self defense or murder no matter who he shot.
Anyway, the verdict was "not guilty".
He wasn’t the only one shooting! He also only shot in self defense. Child RAPIST Rosenbaum’s buddy shot first! I beg to differ with you about pedophiles. They should be shot! And in this case shooting him was too easy for him. He should have suffered. Are you even aware of what that bastard did to those little boys? 5 or more! He RAPED them anally! He also made them be involved in oral sex! His life was worth nothing, but those little boys will forever be altered!
“Just for being pedophiles”! That’s your response! How utterly disgusting you are! Do you by chance have the same proclivities?
FACT: Rosenblum was a child rapist which does not necessarily mean he was a pedophile. Prove me wrong.
shareSemantics! Semantics! OK, he was a child rapist! I will refer to him as Child Rapist Rosenbaum hence forth. You and others appear to be defending the term Pedophile. Could it be “I may be a pedophile, but I’m not a child rapist!” Both are disgusting gutter trash!
share