MovieChat Forums > Meet Me in St. Louis Discussion > Tootie is annoying and disturbed!

Tootie is annoying and disturbed!


While I usually enjoy Margaret O'Brien, I cannot stand her character in this film! Yes, her eccentricity MAY be seen as a way to get attention, I cannot believe the way her family is so quick to dismiss her "cute" behavior.

The Halloween scenes could have been completely removed from the film and not have it effect the overall feeling. First of all, who are these parents that let their 5-10 yr olds run around wild on Halloween, lighting bonfires, and throwing flour in their neighbors' faces?? The scene that irks the living daylights out of myself, my sister and mother is when Tootie is retelling the story of the stuffed dress that was placed on the trolley tracks!!! Dozens of people could have been killed and Tootie's punishment is only ONE kind of ice cream? Meanwhile, Agnes calls Rose a "snob" because she is shocked that her sisters were involved in such a dangerous prank! Why did the filmmakers bother with this? This is ridiculous and one of the most irritating scenes in film history.

Anyone else find the Halloween scene obnoxious and irritating?!?

reply

[deleted]

"While I usually enjoy Margaret O'Brien, I cannot stand her character in this film!"

Good!!!! Thought I was the only one . Her character irritates me me so much, I know Margaret O'Brien is going a great job in the roll....

Great comment from "wisdom of trees" as well....

Read My Lips!!!!

reply

Ya I really hate her character

reply

Tootie was a five year old and an adorable, intelligent and talented little girl with a great imagination, which is sorely lacking in kids today. Only a very mean person could hate this darling character, brought to life perfectly by the amazing Margaret O'Brien.

reply

Fully agree-a wonderful,idyllic film about a world before parental paranoia and Political Correctness.Margaret O'Bruien-about the only child star I've never wanted to throttle!

reply

Yes it's very adorable to play a prank that could have ended tragically and then laugh about it like she did. Tootie is the worst character in the movie.

reply

There was nothing wrong with "Tootie" You people are just too PC.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Disagree.

While I can see people being upset by this, you have to see she is still basically a darling child of good manners and kind disposition. I'd much rather have her around than the myriad total BRATS that infest the world today (especially movies/TV).

As for the trolley threat, yes, I'd be a bit upset about that. I can see that more than anything. But I direct you back to paragraph 1. The girl would get her punishment and it would be over with.


As for more historical context, perhaps you have to put yourself back in 1900. There were still tons of deaths happening to every age, much due to illness as well as dangerous situations. People saw death a whole lot, while now we deny it happens and try to hide it (we don't put dead people in the house any more), because we're so spoiled with great health/fixes, and less intense work.

This girl may have encountered plenty of deaths and just had a fixation on it to work it out in her mind.

reply

I loved Tootie's macabre sense of humor. Only Margaret O'Brien could play her, what a doll.

What seems to escape the understanding of some of the individuals on this board is that this movie is taking place in a different era. Women often died in childbirth. It was not uncommon that many died from diseases such as whooping cough, diptheria and influenza.

Tootie's morbid behavior was a coping mechanism. Personally, I got a real kick out of her.






El Paso, Texas...ever heard of it?

reply

Personally, the Halloween scene is one of my favorites! I did think the lack of adult supervision during the bonfire was a little hard to understand, after all, fire is fire, regardless of what year it is! I loved the flour-in-the-face scene "Tootie" does to impress the older kids!! And I think Margaret O'Brien's sugar-sweet, over-the-top-precocious-child act was, like it or not, fitting for a lighthearted, saccharine-sweet film such as this was.

reply

I see all these points, and I'd certainly want bonfire-lighting kids to be supervised, no matter what the century, and I'd want Tootie or whoever to get a stronger punishment for the trolley stunt, but in the movie for some reason none of these things bothered me. To have have really punished Tootie ould have been contrary to the spirit of the movie, IMO, and just gotten in the way of the story.

reply

I'm not too fond of Tootie's charactor either. If she didn't talk of burying her dead dolls (who died of diseases)in the back yard and placing a stuffed dress on the trolley tracks, she would have been cute.

reply

If you take her too seriously, she is a little on the wacky side. Even for a kid. Within the movie, though, I thought she was quite entertaining.

As to the comments about the, um, "rambunctious" behavior of the kids, I think it probably arises from a mismatch between what's shown in the movie and a prevailing idealized and highly inaccurate view of history which places the advent of misbehavior in the 1960s.

I wonder what the people who freaked out over the Hallowe'en sequence thought of Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer?

reply

I wouldn't take it all too seriously. This is a musical, intended for mindless entertainment. If Tootie was my real life child and her obsession with death went on for too long, it would certainly give me pause. However, all Tootie's talk of burying her dead dolls and such was funny in its bizarre way.

There were a few times when this little girl needed to seriously be taken to task over her behaviour, notably the Halloween trolley stunt, endangering people and getting poor John into trouble with Esther. I was rather annoyed at Tootie getting away with that one, I admit! It also irked me when she was praised as the bravest of them all and cast as so cute when she floured the supposed 'meanest man in town' and shouted that she hated him! I definitely saw this poor man as the victim of the piece!

However, Tootie's antics were not intended as a lesson in child rearing practices or deviant childhood behaviour, merely for amusing audiences and providing a sort of occasional 'gruesome relief' to this generally saccharine (though quite enjoyable) movie!

reply

The trolley stunt really disturbed me when I watched that. People could have died yet these little girls were laughing and acting proud of what they did!

reply

[deleted]

Boy, I'm all over the map on this one.

First of all, I fall in the anti-Tootie camp. We're supposed to adore her and regard her as a mascot, as her family does -- she's played by Margaret O'Brien, after all -- but I never took to the character.

Secondly, I think the family was right to be shocked and angry that Tootie and Agnes had played such a dangerous trick, but they let them get away with it because in the end no one was hurt.

Thirdly, the posters above are right that in real life Tootie and Agnes would have been severely punished (I have no idea what the book says about this). I suspect some of the participants in this thread are simply too young to have grown up in a society where corporal punishment was accepted and parenting was strict.

Then again, it's a rare movie or TV show that shows a kid facing the consequences of misbehavior! That's entertainment.

As for the Halloween scenes, on first viewing I found them creepy, but now they seem rather innocent. Some of us view Halloween as a big societal safety valve in which everyone indulges his/her dark side, and that's what the kids are doing. It's their one evening a year to be little hooligans, and the adults are simply playing along.

And Halloween was traditionally for pranks, some of them harmful. My father said that back in the '30s the kids would fill stockings full of ashes and hit people with them, and it was like getting hit with a sock full of rocks.

First rule of movie-going: never confuse the actor with his role.

reply

Today is Mary Astor Day on TCM and I am watching this movie right now. I'll let you know what I think of it later. I just before wrote a scathing message on a movie called An Then We Were Married or something like that and I was furious at the way a dog was mistreated in that movie. Makes my blood boil to see things like that put in movies. No regard for animals whatsoever. Back to this movie now....well things were quite different in the 40s. My mom never supervised me once I got to be about 8 or 9 and just went out to play and I lived right in the heart of NYC. One thing my mom did teach me was to beware of anyone I didn't know and never to go anywhere with anyone even if I knew them.

reply

Nowadays they are very careful to have a statement in the final credits that no animals were mistreated in the making of the film!

But was the dog really mistreated, or was that part of the plot? In other words, was it there to show how rotten a character was?

First rule of movie-going: never confuse the actor with his role.

reply

There are lots of characters whom I love to watch, but who don't work as real live people: Bart Simpson, Juliet Capulet, Charlie Brown, and Lucy Ricardo.
Do you really really want them to beat the tar out of that girl and make everyone look glumly at the floor while she bawls bloody murder? I am honored to discover I have the same sense of humor as those 40s filmmakers. Who knew? I have classic taste! I have classic taste! It's also shocking that none of them burned their tongues on the ketchup. They should have shot a scene of them holding ice to their lips to replace the Halloween scene which some posters called creepy. How dare Hallowe'en be creepy. I guess Human Centipede would have been less creepy.

reply

I think the character of "Tootie" is most annoying too, but so were a lot of little girls in those days - was it something deliberate? I'm thinking of the daughter in "It Happened to Jane" (a most precocious madam); the chief of police's daughter in the 1945 version of "State Fair" and Amaryllis in "The Music Man". About Halloween - when I was a child in Ireland (c.1950s) we used to have two major bonfires in our village - the competition being to see who could make the most smoke! Nobody's tyres were safe.

reply

It's so funny...my brother and I had only a little knowledge of this film when we sat down to finally watch it...we had no idea we'd be watching someone who, theoretically, would be a psychopath!

reply