Yes, and while Guy had the motive, his character saved him from fulfilling the quid pro quo Bruno offered him, and on a proverbial silver platter. He fought Bruno, he fought murder. There surely must have been a few fragments of evidence favorable to Guy, more than a mere cigarette lighter. Suspicions of people who knew him well enough to understand that he had been, of late, under great stress, a moral stress unrelated to anything he had actually done; more like a dark shadow he was running away from; and it was not a figment of his imagination.
---
Though Hitchcock often used "the wrong man" plot, he often had to keep things moving fast so as not to expose the "plot holes" that might exonerate his hero. Guy Haines here, Cary Grant in North by Northwest(who is actually WITNESSED with his hand on the knife in the back of a man he did NOT kill.)
But who knows? Hitchcock gave a pretty accurate account of the wrongful arrest and trial of a REAL man(Manny Ballestrero, played by Henry Fonda) in The Wrong Man, and captured the "everyday horror" of incarceration and the cost of trial to prove innocence. (And Ballestrero was only accused of being an ARMED robber.)
And this one: Hitchcock made a movie called Frenzy(1972), in which a "wrong man" is convicted and incarcerated for the sex stranglings of the right man. The real case was based on the wrong man who was HANGED for the killings of a London killer named John Christie. In real life, the wrong man not only got convicted, he got killed. (England ended the death penalty thereafter.) And the right man -- John Christie -- WAS eventually found out.
So in movie terms, maybe Guy Haines could have beaten the wrap.
But in real life, a few guys did NOT.
reply
share