"Towering Inferno 2"?


I just read that Irwin Allen had commissioned a script for a sequel to The Towering Inferno, with the usual imaginative designation of most Hollywood sequels over the past forty years: Towering Inferno 2.

In all these years I don't recall ever having heard this. Supposedly Allen wanted Steve McQueen to star in it, but when McQueen rejected the script the project was shelved and instead Allen made the oh-so-much-better ...When Time Ran Out with two TTI veterans, Paul Newman and William Holden (both of whom I presume would otherwise have been in Inferno 2, which would in turn have been Allen's contribution to 1979 or 1980 cinema).

But beyond, not The Poseidon Adventure, but these bare facts, I have not found any other information. Does anyone know anything about this unproduced epic? Would Jim Duncan have constructed a new and improved tower that would really, really, this time not burn down, cross my heart and hope to die in the next fire I set? Given the disastrous nature of Irwin Allen's last three films, disasters all in every sense of the word -- The Swarm, Beyond the Poseidon Adventure, ...When Time Ran Out -- we're lucky Allen never got the chance to mar the memory of his best film with what would surely have been a crummy, badly written, poorly directed, thoroughly implausible and utterly unnecessary sequel.

reply

I heard a rumor about this too, but I think the idea at least would have been more on the order of a simpler "McQueen fights a big fire somewhere else" which admittedly isn't much of a stretch since that is what McQueen's character does for a living. It wouldn't have had to have had Newman or Holden necessarily.

reply

Well, you know Irwin Allen always used big-name casts (he was a major proponent of using as many stars as possible to help the box-office), and as both Newman and Holden were on he hook to him for another picture, I'd be pretty sure it would be reprising their TTI roles.

But I really don't see what they could have done in a 2 that they hadn't already done (and generally well) in the first film. Allen threw everything, probably including a deleted kitchen sink scene, into his masterpiece, TTI. Unless he had a new plot line involving thieves trying to loot the building before it collapsed, or had a storage bin filled with killer bees blow open in the basement and impede firefighters in their desperate efforts, or had a volcano erupt below the building, or maybe had the flames ignite the skies over San Francisco resulting in an emergency mission by a top-secret nuclear submarine to extinguish the blaze, I can't see what he could have done that would have been the least bit original.

Oh, wait, have them all escape in a balloon. Or maybe tightrope-walk to safety over San Francisco Bay, despite the best efforts of the saboteur.

reply

The Towering Inferno 2: The Wrath Of Carlos; The Glass Tower has now been heavily boarded up and presumed empty for six years now. The bartender Carlos was left for dead after a statue fell on him but he survived as a scavenger in the abandoned Glass Tower, he eventually found a number of other survivors, of which he became the leader. In the end there were 29 survivors including Carlos which he views as a providential sign because the cart of wine Duncan told him not to tie himself to was of 1929 vintage, so like the wine he calls his clan "The 29's". Most of the 29's are deformed either from being burned or some other injury, in Carlos' case he has a collapsed rib cage and partial collapsed lung from the statue falling on him resulting in a cough (think General Grevious in Star Wars Episode III). Carlos is now a madman out to seek revenge against Duncan who built the building. Carlos uses the Promenade Room as his command center with his command chair sitting on the ruins of his old bar.

Duncan after six years of lawsuits and resilience finally has an ambitious if not foolhardy plan to extensively remodel the cursed Glass Tower and re-brand it as "Genesis Tower". So Duncan sends in a construction team that mysteriously disappears, in reality Carlos found the crew, killed a few and took the rest hostage. Duncan and his staff enters the building to investigate only to have most of his staff killed by drone guns in the lobby of the building, Duncan lives and a security monitor comes on and he recognizes who it is. Duncan says "Carlos!" Carlos responds "You still remember me Duncan, I cannot help but be touched, I of course remember you".

At one point Carlos traps Duncan in the basement and via intercom tells him that the basement is set to very slowly cave in over a few hours and crush him. Duncan challenges Carlos to come down there and kill him himself. Carlos responds: "I've done far worse than kill you. I've hurt you. And I wish to go on hurting you. I shall leave you as you left me, as you left us, The 29's; crushed for all eternity under the coldness of hard concrete at the center of a dead skyscraper... buried alive! Buried alive...! Duncan: CARLOS!!!!!!! For the sake of poetic justice lets say Duncan does die from being crushed in reversal of what happened to Kirk in Star Trek II.

The Steve McQueen and Paul Newman characters have become good friends since the last movie akin to how Spock and Kirk are friends in Star Trek. They both plan a rescue operation for the surviving hostages in the tower, it ends up being a dog fight. Carlos has the entire tower booby trapped with things like flame throwers and trap doors that lead to elevator shafts that make people fall to their deaths.
They eventually force Carlos and the remaining 29's to confine themselves in the promenade room, faced with a swat team about to climb to the top of the tower and take them out Carlos enacts his final desperate plan by programming the building to be imploded from explosives he planted for such a scenario. The finale is the Steve McQueen character sacrificing himself heroically to save everyone as the Paul Newman character looks on, his action allows people to get far enough away from the building as Carlos implodes the building in a suicidal act of vengeance, the Glass Tower is no more. The film ends with Steve McQueen's character's casket being buried with full San Francisco Fire Department honors, the camera pans up over the San Francisco skyline with numerous standing skyscrapers in view as well as the smoking pile of debris that was The Towering Inferno with his haunting voice in the background repeating his lines from the end of the last movie "One day, you’re going to kill thousands in one of these, unless someone asks us how to build them."

Interestingly enough the view out the window from the Promenade Room in The Towering Inferno was reused for the view from Admiral Kirk's apartment in Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan as well as for Star Trek III: The Search For Spock.

reply

That was about the most preposterous combination of drivel I have ever read

reply

Dirt bikes!!

reply

It wasn't meant to be serious, more of a mockery of the type of unoriginal sequels that Hollywood often does today. Of course any sequel to The Towering Inferno would have been preposterous almost by it's very nature.

reply

chicago103, I just saw your sequel proposal above for the first time, and, as Susan said to Duncan at the opening-night ribbon-cutting, "Congratulations, it's magnificent!"

Very good!

reply

"...we're lucky Allen never got the chance to mar the memory of his best film with what would surely have been a crummy, badly written, poorly directed, thoroughly implausible and utterly unnecessary sequel."

Absoultetly right. McQueen was offered a script called "Towering Inferno 2" in 1976, but he was semi-retired and turned it down. I read somewhere the script was a preliminary version when McQueen got it, but he had no interest and without a guarantee of his involvement the project stalled (not sure if Paul Newman was ever approached). It probably would have been just like you said: Duncan builds a bigger, better tower that's supposed to be fireproof, but, it too catches on fire, and even more people are killed than in the first film.



"Life is a scam" - Steve McQueen

reply

Right you are, Doc. Irwin only ever made one sequel (the Poseidon duo) and we saw what an incompetent mish-mash he made of #2 -- an incredibly ridiculous plot further sunk by an incredibly stupid script and an overabundance of major stars doing nothing. (They didn't even have the ship capsized from the same cause: in the original, a wave generated by an undersea earthquake; in the sequel, a wave generated by a heavy storm. Now that's just ineptly idiotic.)

As I said before, all his late 70s films were terrible on all counts. There's no reason to think a TTI2 would have been any different. Sometimes it's best to just leave things alone. Fortunately, in this case, they were...though not for lack of trying on the part of Irwin Allen, who just didn't know when to stop screwing around with success.

reply

imagine Die Hard made a decade earlier (1978) as TTI2 with McQueen as the Fire Chief O'Hallorhan visiting his new wife (Faye Dunaway) at her new building on Christmas eve..(the building of course is the same Towering Inferno building that has been repaired/restored/improved)

OJ could've also returned to play the Al role (his TI character is now a cop) and William Holden would be back (maybe in something similar to the Takagi role), and Paul Newman back in a supporting role (sorry Paul!). with James Franciscus as Ellis, Erent Borgnine as Thornberg, and Michael Caine as Hans Gruber.

title - The Towering Hijack

hey its not as crazy as it seems ..from TTI imdb trivia:

After seeing this film, novelist Roderick Thorp had a dream that same night about a man being chased through a skyscraper by gun-wielding assailants. This was the inspiration for his 1979 book "Nothing Lasts Forever" which eventually was made into the film "Die Hard."

reply

Unfortunately, I think you also just described the plot for “Skyscraper.”

Which, totally, was not “Die Hard” in “The Towering Inferno.” **Sarcasm generator to OFF!**

reply

still got to check out Skyscraper.. it must be dirt cheap on dvd now

reply

Go in with low expectations... it’s actually a mildly diverting flick. It won’t set the world on fire, but I did enjoy it for what it was.

reply

Agreed. I had extremely low expectations and the movie surpassed them a little.

reply