Weird R-rating


The plot and comedy points to a family friendly G-rated movie

Yet there is an explicit nude scene and a lot of profanity. Odd

reply

You also have to remember this was still a year prior to the PG-13 rating being introduced. Which is probably would've been if it existed (and what the other vacation movies were rated). So it was either PG or R.

reply

I think it still would have gotten an R because there is too much profanity. You can only say the F-bomb once, and it has to be a non-sexual F-bomb, in a PG-13 movie and I think it's said nine times (three times at once). The MPAA's rating system is very autistic.

Nudity wasn't much of an issue in the 80's, though. The sequel had lots of tits and was PG-13.

reply

Translated: Gen Z's way of bagging on movies that were incredibly popular when they were nothing more than sperm in their Dad's dicks..

reply

How is that odd? People in the 1980s were more open minded.

reply