No Nudity+No Gore=Lame

You do kinda have a point. If there's only a small stitching together of a story, which this movie has, it can only help if there's something immediate and superficial, like nudity/gore/action, too hook (or trick) the viewer into continuing watching. In "real" movies those things can distract you from the story, but in the case of this 80s B-movie horror flick there was no story to take away from, and could only have helped the viewing experience.

With that being said, this movie is one of those "so bad it's good" gems that you sometimes come across. I didn't drink nearly enough beer for it.

The real trick to life is not to be in the know, but to be in the mystery. -Fred Alan Wolf

and to think this movie DIDN't have Buck Flower, who played a bum in many 80's movies like They Live, Escape From New York,Terminator,ect.

wow josh! thanks for your insight

[deleted]

[deleted]

Wow, some people cant appreciate movies without nudity, explosions etc. How do these simple minded people manage a stable enough job to even go see movies?
Stop being a victim to a dumbed down society

Actually there IS nudity, that is if you own the DVD. It's an easter egg with an alternate version of Kim Griest's shower scene, showing full nudity. From the main menu, select the "Extras" option. Then an angry C.H.U.D. monster will appear. Press your Up button to highlight his glowing eyes and press your Enter button. Here you will find the unabridged version of the shower scene. Enjoy.

Horror_Metal

Actually the movie showed the C.H.U.D.s leftovers and they were very gory. Like Hugo, the cops and the camera guys, Bosch's wife's head, the dog, and the decapitation of the C.H.U.D. It showed a woman taking a shower. The movie was terrific.