I actually hated "They're REAL and they're Fantastic/ Fabulous "

Reeeeear!

"I must be crazy to be in a loony bin like this."

D-d-don't mention that name.

She can mention anything she wants about her "career", but she can't leave out that it began in part because of a sex tape.


Why do they give out letter jackets to marching band? It's not a sport! We all know it!

May I ask......what do you read when you date obese women????



"Get out here, son! There's a doin's a transpirin'!!"

Well, there are many ways for 'them' to be 'spectacular'. Big ones can be ugly, droopy ones can be big, certain proportions can be wrong - the center protuberance can be asymmetrical or too low, too high, too much to the sides, in the wrong place, the wrong tone, the wrong size or shape, the skin can look bad for various of reasons, etc.

So when you look at numerous 'those', you can realize it's actuall hard to come by with a 'perfect pair', where you can say "now, -that- looks good". It does happen, but it's rare. It's not the size as much as the perfect proportions, color, shape, surface qualities, texture, how the light reacts to it, and so on and so forth.

To find natural 'they' that are not too big, not too small, perky but not droopy, perfect symmetry, perfect proportions of all parts that not only fit the individual ones, but also as a whole, look perfectly good, and even look good while moving - now, that's something that can be called spectacular, because such an occurrence is rare.

Of course I haven't seen hers, so I can neither confirm nor deny whether the statement is accurate, but I am just saying there's lot more than 'size' or even 'shape' to whether 'they' are spectacular or not. And in the show's context, judging from what the episode shows us, I'd say there's a good possibility for them actually being spectacular.

There's more to those things than size.

Some big ones are hideous, some small ones are gorgeous, etc.

It all has to do with color, symmetry, position and also size of the protrusions and the pattern around them. To my eyes, if they're big on the whole, but everything else is tiny, it looks bad. But if the protrusions or the color patterns are badly positioned, it's hideous as well. Big fakes look horrible compared to small real ones. There are certain shapes as well that look more beautiful, attractive, arousing or just pleasing to the eye than others, but this could be a matter of opinion, of course.

So for something to BE 'spectacular', size is not enough, and sometimes not even relevant. Everything would have to be perfect or at least 'optimal', the symmetry and patterns should fit with shapes and the size as perfectly as possible. Hmm, after a brief image search, I have to agree - they don't seem to be all that spectacular at all.

If I were to rate them based on what I have seen in my life so far, they would barely reach a 3.

So did George's grandmother!

I've seen a little of it, but I never paid much attention to it.

Metallica, Iron Maiden, Black Sabbath, and My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fan