both movies are action classics but only one can win. below say why you like the movie you chose and why its better then the other movie. I like them both it's so hard to decide
shareEasily Die Hard. Better acting, writing, and directing. Under Siege isn't a bad film but it's mainly watchable thanks to the villains.
shareDie Hard is drastically overrated IMO. Even when it was a new release when I was 14 I couldn't see what all the fuss was about. I didn't even want to rent it, because who cares about the balding guy from that shitty show Moonlighting anyway? My friends Corey and Tom wanted to see it though so we rented it (one or both of them paid for it). I thought it was okay, and I have the same opinion of it today.
Under Siege isn't one of my favorite movies either, but I like it somewhat better than Die Hard. The villain is the best part of Die Hard, but the Gary Busey and Tommy Lee Jones characters in Under Siege are just as good, if not better, plus, between the two movies, only one of them has Erika Eleniak, who was a smoke show back then.
Enjoy them both but Die Hard is definitely the better movie.
shareEnjoy them both but Die Hard is definitely the better movie.
share