MovieChat Forums > Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995) Discussion > Should Holly have returned and played a ...

Should Holly have returned and played a school teacher


in that school that had the fake bomb in it? That way they could have brought her back and give John more of reason to want to stop Simon and his evil plans.

reply

Frankly no. I liked her in the first 2 but I can see them separating again. Also one doesn't go from working a high class job for a billion dollar corperation to working as a teacher.

reply

Agreed, it makes no sense at all for her to be teaching.

reply

Nahhh, wouldn't have made sense for her to be a teacher all of a sudden. BUT, Holly being back in New York City in another corporate executive job, and them still being separated/divorced, and John's KIDS being students at one of the schools that might blow up... that might have been really good, and added a lot to an already great movie.

reply

On the other hand, her appearing yet again and being in a predicament could be criticized as:

A. Too convenient.
B. Too repetitive (John had to save Holly twice, now he has to save their kids?)

A criticism of the second film was that it was too similar to the first film. I think the third was right to not have Holly be a big part of the story this time.

reply

Eh, this might be my interpretation but it seemed clear when you first see Simon in person that there was no bomb in the school as he says, "They bought it. You can begin." If there really was a bomb why would he say that?

reply