MovieChat Forums > BloodRayne (2006) Discussion > So bad that it's good?

So bad that it's good?


So they are showing this later on tonight, and I checked in here to see the avg. score. And DAUMN! That's really low :P

So my question. Is it so horribly bad that it's actually worth to watch just for fun? You know like The Excorsist is funny and not scary at all... So?

reply

Yes. But it's nowhere near as bad as it's made out to be. Many people gave it 1/10 only because Uwe Boll directed it. It's entertaining and it has a lot of gore. The acting sucks, but not one should give a *beep* because it's a cheesy horror movie!

reply

It's not "so bad that it's good"... it's just plain "bad". It's very boring. Very, very boring.

"... to HELL with you!" -- Conan

reply

i saw the rating of the movie and thought "" come on..it cant be THAT bad""
so i downloaded it, watched and i shud admit i was wrong...it really really is VERY VERY bad film.
full of nonsense script, costumes , bad direction, story line everything is bad from A to Z.
the only thing worth watching in the film is kristina lokken...and NO ,,i am not a usual boll hater ...i didnt even know the guy before this movie and after reading opinions of so many viewers i think i shud refrain myself from watching any of his work.

reply

[deleted]

"full of nonsense script, costumes, bad direction"

Who gives a *beep* about these details in a cheesy horror movie?

I'm pretty sure that many of you didn't see the uncut version. It's very gory and every gore fan should see it. Don't get me wrong, I really don't think that this movie is good, it's not, but it's nowhere near as bad as it's made out to be. It's entertaining and gory and it's not the kind of movie that needs anything else.

reply

No.. It's so bad that it's bad.

--------------------
"I can't breath.."
"YOU CAN'T ACT!"

reply

Yes, IMO its fun.

reply

I reckon its pretty boring, I wish it was so bad it was good but unforunately it's not. In fact I recently came across a review of the film I've gotta say I agree with - www.craptasticmovies.com/reviewbloodrayne.html - I think when a bad movie website doesn't like it then it has gotta be saying something!

reply

I didn't know it was an Uwe Boll movie when I first watched it. And I have only seen one other Boll film, so I don't think I was very much prejudiced when I saw Bloodrayne. And it is abysmally bad, but not to the point of making it funny (at least not all the time). It's more painful than fun, because there are so many great actors in there, and they are all so clueless that they sound and act terrible. And who's to blame them? The dialogues hardly make sense most of the time. So in addition to that, if their director doesn't direct them (I don't know if that's the case, it's just the only plausible explanation I could come up with), how could they be good?
I'm watching Beowulf with Christophe Lambert right now, because it used to be my Worst Movie Ever, and I wanted to make sure: but yeah, even barely 20 mns in, I am sure. Bloodrayne is now top of the list, followed by In The Name Of The King, then Beowulf (1999).

"Sometimes I'm callous and strange."

reply

[deleted]

i think it's so bad it's good. the bad parts are hilarious, so if you're watching this alone or with family/friends, you can laugh out loud and have a good time.

reply

[deleted]