No Peter Dinklage?
What a missed opportunity! Would love to see Warwick Davis and Peter Dinklage star alongside each other in something, being the 2 most famous dwarf actors out there.
sharePeter Dinklage cannot be included, for 2 reasons:
1. He is white
2. He is male
The only reason that Warwick Davis is in this is to hook people in for the bait and switch. No one would watch this if he wasn't in it, so they had to include him.
In the woke stakes you can get away with being white and a male if you are a dwarf. If you were doing woke top trumps, disabilities would rate pretty high.
shareto me is seems the progressive stack goes like this:
1. female (although we can't define what this is, depending on the context)
2. Non white(except for asians, depending on the context)
3. Non heterosexual (cis)
4. disabled
I mean, it basically seems to be about spoiled white women hating their fathers, and the rest is all rationalization, which is why disabled is so low on this list, contrary to common sense.
The (spoiled) rich white women are female, which is while female is good(although we can't define it, depending on the context), white male is bad, because it represents the father who they hate. The reason non heterosexuals are preferred is because gay men are percieved as less threatening, and of course lesbians don't have to have sex with white males. Disabled people are included because they have to be(otherwise the fact that this is all ego-stroking bullshit would be too obvious), hence they are low down on the list because they are included only out of necessity.
If you are wondering why the spoiled rich white women hate their fathers, well basically men who become rich tend to be domineering assholes. Those qualities are associated with financial success. They also tend to be emotionally distant, and don't have much time to spend with their families(daughters). who therefore are both spoiled and emotionally unstable.
shareThe trump card is a black disabled lesbian. A disabled white heterosexual person might fall a bit further down the pecking order but the disability still counts for a lot in my opinion.
shareThe problem is that he was a lead in a 1988 film. The modern woke crowd believe that before about 2016, there were no strong female leading characters, no black leading characters etc. This is why you have the actor saying this is the first black elf on screen, despite there being black elves in The Witcher this very year.
Also, being a dwarf is not really perceived as a disability. And the fact that Warwick Davis was a leading white male in the orignal during the 1980s, which to the brain of a woke person means none of the aforementioned groups could ever possibly have had a leading role, I think that excludes him from belonging to the oppressed, and his white maleness trumps the dwarfism.
The first black Elf was in Dungeons & Dragons (2000)
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTMyOTc5NDI3NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjE0NDQ0NA@@._V1_UY1200_CR585,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg
Black disabled queer trans non-binary is the top of the stack. They are the holy grail of minorities.
As white men we must step aside, Shut Up, and listen. Also grovel, you have to grovel.
you're an idiot