MovieChat Forums > LanceDance
LanceDance (1088)
Posts
She's supposed to be a disabled female who mentors a straight white dude, why change that?
Ep 4: Turns out Kang wasn’t the true threat…
How do you pronounce his first name?
Whatever happened to Sarahs' summercamp friend, Aubrey?
Barry technically should’ve recognized Bruce at the end, why didn’t he?
"Unusual voting activity" for Little Mermaid but not this?
How did a light-skinned Dom and Elsa produce a black-ish boy?
Jeez, still no release date for Blu-ray?
What's up with the lack of diversity among the villains?
View all posts >
Replies
Turns out all the best British soldiers went to America and rebelled. No wonder England has failed since.
Now they’re getting taken over by Muslims.
I have to agree that, ironically, Josstice League had the best and most comic-accurate Superman in the DCEU, and Cavill actually gave a solid performance. Many people forget that because they were too distracted by his CGI mouth. Why they didn't just CGI his whole face is beyond me, it might have looked a little uncanny like young Jeff Bridges in Tron Legacy, but it would've still been better than what we got, but I digress.
The nerdy giga-chad Henry is what people love, so much so that they'll even take back, or at least downplay, whatever criticisms they gave him before.
I think once they found out he was a nerd, many of them did a complete 180 on their views. Now he was "one of them". I still remember people shitting on his acting when Man of Steel came out, and BvS didn't help either. Snyder's writing and Cavill's wooden acting created an edgy mopey Superman that nobody liked. Now they're in love with the apparent nerdy giga-chad Henry Cavill.
He seems like a swell guy, and he certainly looks like a real-life Superman. His acting isn't the best, but had he been born 15-20 years earlier, I'm pretty sure he'd be up there with Vin Diesel, Dwayne Johnson, and Jason Statham as far as post-2000 action stars go. Unfortunately for him, he looks exactly like the person modern Hollywood hates, and he's adjacent to box-office poison, which I blame external factors on. I'm honestly surprised he's still getting Hollywood jobs at all.
Depends on the situation.
It’s relevant to her character, who’s supposed to be conventionally beautiful.
It’s not, it’s a reasonable take.
That doesn’t explain why she’s ugly. Do they seriously expect people to “reimagine” their beauty standards too?
Ask the people who demanded for “muh representation and inclusion” in the first place why it mattered to them what characters looked like. They didn’t care about the IP before, and they still don’t.
The vast majority of people recognize his work and how influential it was. His legacy still affects art even today.
If this was some school play, nobody would care. But this is professional theater, which comes with higher standards. If she was at least hot, most people wouldn’t care as much. But they chose an ugly woman on purpose. This isn’t an isolated incident either, they’ve been doing this for years.
So no, you haven't watched all of them. And I wouldn't rely too much on audience and critic scores these days, not only does ad populum not make something good, rating sites have been shown to be tampered with from time to time.
Have you seen Idiocracy?
View all replies >