MovieChat Forums > Crimes of the Future (2022) Discussion > I hear it's very gory...

I hear it's very gory...

posted 2 years ago by Rorikon (16927)
15 replies | jump to latest

There was news about people walking out because it was too grotesque and with a 18+ rating, body mutilation will be an all time high.

reply

[–] GingerbreadPimp (1767) 2 years ago

Saw it last night. It had some gore but it really wasn't that bad at all. Cronenberg has much gorier and disturbing movies than this.

reply

[–] Rorikon (16927) 2 years ago

Can you spoil me and describe the gory scenes? I don't plan on watching it.

reply

[–] stinky (52) 2 years ago

Why do you want them described?

reply

[–] GingerbreadPimp (1767) 2 years ago

Most of the gore is just close ups of guts and organs during surgery scenes. There are also scenes of people cutting themselves. The most violent part is where a character gets killed with a drill to his head and we see a bunch of blood pour out of his head afterwards. It's really not that bad

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 2 years ago

Only 65% of Google users liked the movie. Maybe it's too early for a consensus right now, but the Google users percentage is usually always higher than the IMDb, Metacritic, or Rotten Tomatoes score. Right now, it's less than those sources.

reply

[–] pjl69 (2554) 2 years ago

Cronenberg movies aren't for everybody...

reply

[–] GingerbreadPimp (1767) 2 years ago

I like Cronenbeg and I thought this sucked. His 2nd worst movie next to Cosmopolis

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 2 years ago

Absolutely!!!!

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 2 years ago

Now down to 62% of Google users. That's a shame. Was hoping there'd be a lot of viewer love for Cronenberg's comeback film. I'm still going to watch it though. It's at 78% on Rotten Tomatoes. But like I said above, the Google user percentage is usually higher than the review sights.

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 2 years ago

And now I see why. Unfortunately, it did suck.

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (6672) 2 years ago

any idiot can rate something on google even without watching more than 10 minutes. why do you put so much emphasis on that shit?

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 2 years ago

[–] April-151-CT (5441) 25 days ago
Only 65% of Google users liked the movie. Maybe it's too early for a consensus right now, but the Google users percentage is usually always higher than the IMDb, Metacritic, or Rotten Tomatoes score. Right now, it's less than those sources

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (6672) 2 years ago

Is that supposed to answer my question?

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

It wasn’t that bad. It wasn’t as gory as I thought it would be.

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 2 years ago

Yeah it wasn't really gory. The two things that I think were worse than gore is watching a woman slowly contemplate, straddle, then smother her 8 year old son with a pillow. And then said 8 year old's private parts on display for an extended period of time at the end of the movie (regardless if it's CGI or a mannequin)

reply